基于2003—2019年中国内地30个省份面板数据,运用中介效应、门槛效应模型实证检验FDI对我国技术创新与经济高质量发展的影响,并进行机制分析。研究发现:第一,在环境规制约束下,FDI技术溢出效应显著,FDI能够促进我国经济高质发展,现阶段环境规制具有“创新补偿”效应;FDI与环境规制的交互项能够显著促进经济高质量发展,环境规制对FDI发挥一定的正向筛选作用。第二,在考虑内生性后,FDI、环境规制及其交互项对经济高质量发展影响的核心结论依然成立,并且存在区域异质性。第三,两种中介效应检验结果显示,FDI通过技术创新机制作用于我国经济高质量发展。第四,整体而言,FDI通过技术创新水平这一中介路径对经济高质量发展产生负向影响,与理论预期不符。
The increasingly serious problems of resource waste and environmental pollution have seriously affected the sustainable and green development of the economy. It is urgent to transform the high energy-consuming economic development model to a total factor productivity (TFP) growth model that relies on technological progress, innovate economic development methods to achieve high-quality economic development. Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic and the changes in the domestic and international environment, China's economy is facing enormous difficulties and challenges. Utilizing foreign capital is an important means for China to open up to the outside world at a higher level, and it is an important part of building a new system of a higher-level open economy. Therefore, it is vital to use foreign capital properly so as to promote high-quality economic development and modernization.#br#Then, in the process of promoting "higher level opening up", it is urgernt to find out how to better introduce and make good use of foreign direct investment(FDI), especially high-quality foreign capital, so as to promote innovation and development. Under the current environmental policy, will FDI have serious adverse consequences for China's environment? Is FDI conducive to technological innovation and high-quality economic development? Does environmental regulation have a positive screening function for FDI? What is the mechanism behind FDI's impact on high-quality economic development? How to make better use of FDI to boost high-quality economic development? The answers to these questions are significant to promoting the high-quality development.#br#Throughout the existing literature, the research on FDI, technological innovation and high-quality economic development has not yet been included in the unified framework for in-depth discussion, and there is a lack of discussion on the impact mechanism and analysis of the possible reasons behind the mechanism.Therefore, on the basis of fully learning from the existing literature, this paper uses the methods such as the intermediary effect and threshold effect to empirically analyze the impact of FDI on China's technological innovation and high-quality economic development and its mechanism with provincial panel data of China from 2003 to 2019. It is found that with the constraints of environmental regulation, a significant role in promoting technological innovation and its spillover effect are obvious; FDI can improve the quality of China's economic development with the constraints of environmental regulation. At present, environmental regulation has an "innovative compensation" effect in China, and the interaction of FDI and environmental regulation has significantly promoted the improvement of the quality of economic development, and environmental regulation has a certain screening effect on FDI. After overcoming endogenity, the core conclusions of the impact of FDI, environmental regulation and their interactions on high-quality economic development still holds, and there are regional and temporal heterogeneity characteristics. The results of the intermediary effect test show that FDI will affect quality development of the economy through technology innovation. In general, FDI has a negative impact on the quality of economic development through the intermediary approach of technological innovation, which is inconsistent with the theoretical expectation. Further analysis finds that the impact of technological innovation and FDI on the quality of economic development has a significant threshold effect, which shows that the impact on the quality of economic development is different within the range of different technological innovation levels. Both technological innovation and environmental regulations must reach certain threshold conditions to promote high-quality economic development.#br#According to the above research conclusions, this paper has the following policy implications. Firstly it is necessary to effectively exert the negative force of environmental regulation and promote high-quality economic development in an efficient and reasonable manner. Secondly all regions should consider its absorptive capacity when introducing FDI. Meanwhile different industries and regions should reasonably introduce the scale of foreign investment and pay attention to the quality of FDI. Thirdly, to better exert the positive technological spillover effect of FDI, it’s essential to consider the different levels of technological innovation in each region according to the different intermediary transmission channels of FDI’s impact on the quality of economic development, and rationally formulate differentiated policies at different stages of development. Therefore, the government should implement reasonable environmental regulation standards according to regional conditions, achieve a balance between environmental protection and economic development, and promote technological innovation and development of enterprises through measures,such as improving the environment for scientific and technological innovation and providing more training opportunities.#br#
[1] 陈诗一. 能源消耗、二氧化碳排放与中国工业的可持续发展[J].经济研究, 2009, 44(4):41-55.
[2] 任保平.新时代中国经济从高速增长转向高质量发展:理论阐释与实践取向[J].学术月刊,2018,50(3):66-74,86.
[3] 李梅.国际R&D溢出与中国技术进步——基于FDI和OFDI传导机制的实证研究[J].科研管理,2012,33(4):86-92.
[4] 江小涓,孟丽君.内循环为主、外循环赋能与更高水平双循环——国际经验与中国实践[J].管理世界,2021,37(1):1-19.
[5] 任保平,宋雪纯.以新发展理念引领中国经济高质量发展的难点及实现路径[J].经济纵横,2020,36(6):45-54.
[6] 陈诗一,陈登科.雾霾污染、政府治理与经济高质量发展[J].经济研究,2018,53(2):20-34.
[7] 师博,任保平.中国省际经济高质量发展的测度与分析[J].经济问题,2018,40(4):1-6.
[8] 刘志彪,凌永辉.结构转换、全要素生产率与高质量发展[J].管理世界,2020,36(7):15-29.
[9] RICHARD C M YAM, WILLIAM LO, ESTHER P Y TANG,et al. Analysis of sources of innovation, technological innovation capabilities, and performance:an empirical study of Hong Kong manufacturing industries [J]. Research Policy, 2011,40(3):391-402.
[10] 田红彬,郝雯雯.FDI、环境规制与绿色创新效率[J].中国软科学,2020,35(8):174-183.
[11] 傅京燕,胡瑾,曹翔.不同来源FDI、环境规制与绿色全要素生产率[J].国际贸易问题,2018,34(7):134-148.
[12] 吴传清,邓明亮.科技创新、对外开放与长江经济带高质量发展[J].科技进步与对策,2019,36(3):33-41.
[13] 随洪光,余李,段鹏飞.外商直接投资、汇率甄别与经济增长质量--基于中国省级样本的经验分析[J].经济科学,2017,39(2):59-73.
[14] 上官绪明,葛斌华.科技创新、环境规制与经济高质量发展——来自中国278个地级及以上城市的经验证据[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2020,30(6):95-104.
[15] 原毅军,谢荣辉.FDI、环境规制与中国工业绿色全要素生产率增长——基于Luenberger 指数的实证研究[J]. 国际贸易问题,2015,41(8):84 -93.
[16] 陈超凡.中国工业绿色全要素生产率及其影响因素——基于ML生产率指数及动态面板模型的实证研究[J].统计研究,2016,33(3):53-62.
[17] 周忠宝,邓莉,肖和录,等.外商直接投资对中国经济高质量发展的影响——基于Index DEA和面板分位回归的分析[J].中国管理科学,2022,30(5):118-130.
[18] MARKUSEN J R, VENABLES A J. Foreign direct investment as a catalyst for industrial development[J].European Economic Review, 1997, 43(2):335-356.
[19] ANTWEILER W, COPELAND B R, TAYLOR M S. Is free trade good for the environment[J].American Economic Review, 2001, 1(4):877-908.
[20] SHADBEGIAN R J, GRAY W B. Pollution abatement expenditures and plant-level productivity: a production function approach[J].Ecological Economics, 2005, 54(2-3): 196-208.
[21] PORTER M E, LINDE CVD. Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship[J].Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1995, 9(4):97-118.
[22] 王恕立, 王许亮.服务业FDI提高了绿色全要素生产率吗——基于中国省际面板数据的实证研究[J].国际贸易问题, 2017(12):83-93.
[23] 鲁钊阳,廖杉杉.FDI技术溢出与区域创新能力差异的双门槛效应[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2012,29(5):75-88.
[24] 常红,王军.环境规制对经济增长的影响研究——基于技术创新门槛的经验分析[J].经济问题探索,2020(11):41-51.
[25] 董直庆, 王辉.环境规制的“本地—邻地”绿色技术进步效应[J].中国工业经济, 2019,35(1):100-118.
[26] 郑强,冉光和,邓睿,等.中国FDI环境效应的再检验[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2017,27(4):78-86.
[27] 温忠麟,叶宝娟.中介效应分析:方法和模型发展[J].心理科学进展,2014,22(5):731-745.
[28] 温忠麟,叶宝娟.有调节的中介模型检验方法:竞争还是替补[J].心理学报,2014,46(5):714-726.
[29] HANSEN B E. Threshold effects in non-dynamic panels: estimation, testing and inference [J]. Journal of Econometrics,1999, 93(2): 345-368.
[30] 金碚.关于“高质量发展”的经济学研究[J].中国工业经济,2018,35(4):5-18.