企业创新管理

工业互联网对企业数字创新的影响——基于倾向得分匹配的双重差分验证

  • 王玉荣 ,
  • 段玉婷 ,
  • 卓苏凡
展开
  • (对外经济贸易大学 国际商学院,北京 100029)
王玉荣(1965—),女,江西鹰潭人,博士,对外经济贸易大学国际商学院教授、博士生导师,研究方向为创新管理;段玉婷(1990—),女,山东临沂人,对外经济贸易大学国际商学院博士研究生,研究方向为创新管理、技术创新、工业互联网;卓苏凡(1991—),男,福建建瓯人,对外经济贸易大学国际商学院博士研究生,研究方向为创新管理、风险投资。本文通讯作者:段玉婷。

收稿日期: 2021-02-26

  修回日期: 2021-03-26

  网络出版日期: 2022-04-25

基金资助

北京市社会科学基金一般项目(17GLB027)

Effects of Industrial IoT on Enterprise Digital Innovation:A PSM-DID Approach

  • Wang Yurong ,
  • Duan Yuting ,
  • Zhuo Sufan
Expand
  • (Business School,University of International Business and Economics,Beijing 100029,China)

Received date: 2021-02-26

  Revised date: 2021-03-26

  Online published: 2022-04-25

摘要

在信息技术与产业融合发展的数字化时代,如何通过数字化技术实现转型升级及价值创造是企业创新发展面临的现实问题。工业互联网作为优化资源配置、强化产业协作配套对接的重要载体,为实现企业数字创新提供了可行路径。基于2013—2019年中国制造业A股上市公司数据,运用倾向得分匹配—双重差分方法,实证检验工业互联网对企业数字创新的影响。结果发现,工业互联网能够显著促进企业数字创新,但其对于创新投入端的影响大于创新产出端。进一步异质性检验分析发现,相对于国有企业,工业互联网对民营企业的影响更显著;相对于低市场化水平城市的企业,工业互联网对高市场化水平城市企业的影响更显著。研究结论可为国家完善工业互联网平台建设,充分发挥其对企业数字创新的促进作用提供经验证据。

本文引用格式

王玉荣 , 段玉婷 , 卓苏凡 . 工业互联网对企业数字创新的影响——基于倾向得分匹配的双重差分验证[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2022 , 39(8) : 89 -98 . DOI: 10.6049/kjjbydc.2021020513

Abstract

With the progress of a new round of global scientific, technological and industrial revolution, connecting traditional industry with modern technology through the deep integration of the new generation information technology and manufacturing industry, promoting the development of manufacturing industry to digitization, networking and intelligence, and promoting the application of the achievements of the new industrial revolution in the industrial field has become an important way to improve the intelligent level of manufacturing industry and to create new advantages of digital economy of China. In this digital era,information technology and industrial co-coordinated develop .How to achieve transformation and upgrading and new value creation through digital technology is a realistic and urgent problem for enterprises to solve. The emergence of industrial Internet, as an important carrier to promote the optimal allocation of resources and strengthen industrial cooperation and matching, provides a possible path for realizing enterprise digital innovation. #br#This paper takes Chinese manufacturing listed enterprises as the research object, and discusses the effect of the application of IIOT on enterprise innovation under the digital background. Based on the data of A-share listed companies in China's manufacturing industry from 2013 to 2019, this paper empirically tests the impact of Industrial IoT on enterprise digital innovation by using propensity score matching - double difference method.#br#The results show that the application of enterprise Industrial IOT has significantly promoted enterprise digital innovation (=0.5408,p<0.01 for DID). At the same time, based on the promotion of digital innovation process, this paper uses R & D input intensity and invention patent application as proxy dependent variables in the initial stage and output stage of digital innovation respectively, which also confirms the promotion effect of Industrial IOT(R&D =1.0406,p<0.01; patent lag1 =0.1624,p<0.01; patent lag2 =0.2682,p<0.01 for DID), but the coefficients corresponding to the three dependent variables are different. The Industrial IoT can significantly and effectively promote the whole process of enterprise digital innovation, but the impact on innovation input side is greater than that on innovation output side. Further heterogeneity test analysis shows that compared with state-owned enterprises (=0.5326,p<0.01 for DID), the Industrial IoT has a greater impact on private enterprises (=0.5495,p<0.01 for DID). Compared with the low level of market-oriented urban enterprises (=0.4307,p<0.01 for DID), the Industrial IoT has a greater impact on urban enterprises with high marketization level (=0.5638,p<0.01 for DID).#br# This paper provides empirical evidence for China to promote and improve the construction of Industrial IOT platform and give full play to its role in promoting enterprise digital innovation. It constructs a complete theoretical analysis framework for enterprises to carry out digital innovation activities from the perspective of Industrial IOT and ideas for Chinese enterprises to accelerate the realization of digital innovation. At the same time, this study also provides scientific evidence for testing the policy implementation effect of Chinese Industrial IOT. Based on the test of heterogeneity, this study analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of the current Industrial IOT development, and provides important factual basis for business operators and policy makers. It is suggested that enterprises need a digital workplace in the process of realizing digital innovation. In addition to introducing digital technology, they also need to coordinate and cooperate with the external environment and organizations. Enterprises can take the industrial Internet as an important carrier to obtain resources for realizing digital innovation. Moreover, industrial Internet can promote the realization of digital innovation by cultivating the initial conditions of enterprise innovation and optimizing the innovation process. Therefore, managers need to adopt corresponding strategies and management behaviors according to the innovation business stage, give full play to the positive impact of R & D investment, and increase the output of digital innovation activities. In addition to the enterprise's own innovation environment, government departments need to create an institutional environment conducive to enterprise innovation activities. A sound institutional environment can not only enhance the enthusiasm and willingness of enterprise innovation, but also ensure the realization of enterprise business value to a certain extent.#br#

参考文献

[1] 余江,孟庆时,张越,等. 数字创新:创新研究新视角的探索及启示[J]. 科学学研究,2017,35(7):1103-1111.
[2] 刘洋,董久钰,魏江.数字创新管理:理论框架与未来研究[J]. 管理世界,2020,36(7):198-217,219.
[3] 吕文晶,陈劲,刘进.工业互联网的智能制造模式与企业平台建设——基于海尔集团的案例研究[J]. 中国软科学,2019,34(7):1-13.
[4] 李君,邱君降,柳杨,等. 工业互联网平台评价指标体系构建与应用研究[J]. 中国科技论坛,2018,34(12):70-86.
[5] 拉梅什·钱德尔·夏尔马,彭一为,肖俊洪.数字创新:远程开放学习准备好了吗?[J].中国远程教育,2018(8):31-44,78,80.
[6] ABRELL T,PIHLAJAMAA M,KANTO L,et al. The role of users and customers in digital innovation[J]. Information & Management,2016,53(3):324-335.
[7] HININGS B,GEGENHUBER T,GREENWOOD R. Digital innovation and transformation: an institutional perspective[J]. Information and Organization,2018,28(1):52-61.
[8] SCOTT S V,VAN REENEN J,ZACHARIADIS M. The long-term effect of digital innovation on bank performance: an empirical study of SWIFT adoption in financial services[J]. Research Policy,2017,46(5):984-1004.
[9] BOLAND R J,JR YOO L Y. Wakes of innovation in project networks:the case of digital 3-D representations in architecture,engineering,and Construction[J]. Organization Science,2007,18(4):631-647.
[10] YOO Y,HENFRIDSSON O,LYYTINEN K. Research commentary—the new organizing logic of digital innovation: an agenda for information systems research[J]. Information systems research,2010,21(4):724-735.
[11] NYLN D,HOLMSTRM J. Digital innovation strategy: a framework for diagnosing and improving digital product and service innovation[J]. Business Horizons,2015,58(1):57-67.
[12] NAMBISAN S,LYYTINEN K,MAJCHRZAK A,et al. Digital innovation management: reinventing innovation management research in a digital world[J]. MIS Quarterly,2017,41(1): 223-238.
[13] ABRELL T,PIHLAJAMAA M,KANTO L,et al. The role of users and customers in digital innovation: insights from B2B manufacturing firms[J]. Information & Management,2016,53(3):324-335.
[14] DERY K,SEBASTIAN I M,VAN DER MEULEN N. The digital workplace is key to digital innovation[J]. MIS Quarterly Executive,2017,16(2): 135-152.
[15] YOO Y,BOLAND J R R J,LYYTINEN,K,et al. Organizing for innovation in the digitized world[J]. Organization science,2012,23(5):1398-1408.
[16] SAHUT J M,DANA L P,LAROCHE M. Digital innovations,impacts on marketing,value chain and business models: an introduction[J]. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l'Administration,2020, 37(1): 61-67.
[17] WOLLSCHLAEGER M,SAUTER T,JASPERNEITE J. The future of industrial communication: automation networks in the era of the internet of things and industry 4.0[J]. Industrial Electronics Magazine,2017, 11(1): 17-27.
[18] LAURSEN K,SALTER A. Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2006,27(2):131-150.
[19] 高良谋,张一进.平台理论的演进与启示[J]. 中国科技论坛,2018,34(1):123-131.
[20] 于晓宇,金晓玲,吴祝欣. 困局与破局:工业互联网平台的打造[J]. 清华管理评论,2019,9(4):58-65.
[21] 徐晓兰.建设国家工业互联网大数据中心 促进实体经济高质量发展[J]. 人民邮电,2020,62(6).
[22] LI J,YU F R,DENG G,LUO C,et al. Industrial internet: a survey on the enabling technologies,applications,and challenges[J]. Communications Surveys and Tutorials,2017,19(3):1504-1526.
[23] BALLON P. Business modelling revisited: the configuration of control and value[J]. INFO-The Journal of policy,regulation and strategy for Telecommunications,2007,9(5):6-19.
[24] 梁玉.用数字化制造、系统集成和定制化服务,真正推动我国制造业技术进步——访中国工程院院士、上海交通大学教授阮雪榆[J]. 制造技术与机床,2012,62(5):30-32.
[25] 邵建,童恩,袁吉银,等. “互联网+”提升制造业的数字化服务水平[J]. 江苏通信,2015,31(6):19-21.
[26] 熊雄.工业互联网助推制造业数字化转型——专访中国信息通信研究院院长刘多[J]. 中国电信业,2019,20(3):16-18.
[27] IIVARI M M,AHOKANGAS P,KOMI M T,et al. Toward ecosystemic business models in the context of industrial internet[J]. Journal of Business Models,2016,4(2): 42-59.
[28] 杨少杰.工业互联网与组织新模式[J]. 中国工业和信息化,2018,4(11):24-33.
[29] 李海舰,李燕. 企业组织形态演进研究——从工业经济时代到智能经济时代[J]. 经济管理,2019,41(10):22-36.
[30] 黄阳华. 工业革命中生产组织方式变革的历史考察与展望——基于康德拉季耶夫长波的分析[J]. 中国人民大学学报,2016,30(3):66-77.
[31] 王玮,杜书升,曹溪. 工业互联网引发的“颠覆式”管理变革[J]. 清华管理评论,2019,5(3):62-72.
[32] 庄彩云,陈国宏,梁娟,等. 互联网能力、双元战略柔性与知识创造绩效[J]. 科学学研究,2020,38(10):1837-1846,1910.
[33] 刘瑞明,赵仁杰.国家高新区推动了地区经济发展吗——基于双重差分方法的验证[J]. 管理世界,2015,31(8):30-38.
[34] LEUVEN E,SIANESI B. PSMATCH2: stata module to perform full Mahalanobis and propensity score matching,common support graphing,and covariate imbalance testing[J]. Statistical Software Components,2003(8).
[35] KHIN S,HO T C. Digital technology,digital capability and organizational performance: a mediating role of digital innovation[J]. International Journal of Innovation Science,2020,11(2): 177-195.
[36] LU Z,DONG L. Analysis of digital innovation effect of manufacturing industry based on scenario theory[C].2020 6th International Conference on Information Management (ICIM). IEEE,2020:147-151.
[37] MUSLU V,RADHAKRISHNAN S,SUBRAMANYAM K R.et al. Forward-looking md&a disclosures and the information environment[J]. Management ence Journal of the Institute for Operations Research & the Management ences,2015,61(5): 931-948.
[38] 张森,温军,刘红. 数字经济创新探究:一个综合视角[J]. 经济学家,2020,32(2):80-87.
[39] 汪芳,石鑫,赵玉林. “互联网+”战略、企业异质性与研发投入[J]. 研究与发展管理,2020,32(4):124-135.
[40] 王小鲁,樊纲,胡李鹏. 中国分省份市场化指数报告(2018)[R]. 社会科学文献出版社,2019.
[41] 年佳琪,祝尚臻,侯欣明,等. 工业物联网在生产过程监测系统中的应用[J]. 数字通信世界,2019,15(2):183.
[42] 任力.以工业互联网推进民营企业高质量发展[J]. 人民论坛·学术前沿,2020,9(13):52-59.
[43] 董晓庆,赵坚,袁朋伟. 国有企业创新效率损失研究[J]. 中国工业经济,2014,31(2):97-108.
[44] 叶静怡,林佳,张鹏飞,等. 中国国有企业的独特作用:基于知识溢出的视角[J]. 经济研究,2019,54(6):40-54.
[45] ACEMOGLU D,JOHNSON S,ROBINSON J. Institutions as the fundamental cause of long-run growth[J]. Nber Working Papers,2004.
[46] 李永兵,骆品亮,袁博. 我国P2P平台区域集聚与“跑路”现象:一个来自制度环境的解释[J]. 上海经济研究,2016,33(8):84-91.
[47] 阳立高,龚世豪,王铂,等. 人力资本、技术进步与制造业升级[J]. 中国软科学,2018,33(1):138-148.
文章导航

/