企业创新管理

董事长—总经理校友关系对公司创新投入的影响——公司内部控制与机构投资者持股的调节作用

  • 严若森 ,
  • 郭钧益
展开
  • (武汉大学 经济与管理学院,湖北 武汉 430072)
严若森(1971—),男,湖南华容人,博士,武汉大学经济与管理学院教授、博士生导师,研究方向为公司治理、企业理论、制度理论、战略管理、创新管理;郭钧益(1997—),男,江西吉安人,武汉大学经济与管理学院硕士研究生,研究方向为公司治理、创新管理。

收稿日期: 2020-12-04

  修回日期: 2021-03-06

  网络出版日期: 2022-02-16

基金资助

国家自然科学基金面上项目(72072137);教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目(18YJA630126)

The Impact of Chairman-CEO Alumni Relation on Corporate Innovation Investment:based on the Moderating Effects of Internal Control and Institutional Investors Shareholding

  • Yan Ruosen ,
  • Guo Junyi
Expand
  • (Economics and Management School,Wuhan University,Wuhan 430072,China)

Received date: 2020-12-04

  Revised date: 2021-03-06

  Online published: 2022-02-16

摘要

作为社会关系的重要一环,校友关系会对管理者决策产生影响。选取2012—2017年中国沪深两市A股上市公司为研究样本,利用固定效应模型检验董事长—总经理校友关系对公司创新投入的影响,通过考察公司内部控制和机构投资者持股对上述影响的调节作用,进而揭示其中相关作用机制。结果显示:董事长—总经理校友关系会促进公司创新投入;公司内部控制和机构投资者持股均正向调节董事长—总经理校友关系对公司创新投入的促进作用。进一步研究发现,董事长—总经理校友关系对公司创新投入的促进作用在非国有企业、高科技公司中更显著,而地区市场化程度差异对上述促进作用的影响并未表现出显著不同。研究结论能够为公司更有效地植入校友文化、完善选人用人与高管再教育机制等提供管理启示。

本文引用格式

严若森 , 郭钧益 . 董事长—总经理校友关系对公司创新投入的影响——公司内部控制与机构投资者持股的调节作用[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2022 , 39(3) : 77 -86 . DOI: 10.6049/kjjbydc.2020120133

Abstract

In the era of knowledge economy, the economic development model supported by traditional production factors has gradually got stuck in a development bottleneck, developing new knowledge and technologies is playing an increasingly important role in companies' lifetime. Companies obtain new knowledge and technologies by engaging in innovative activities such as developing unique products and services to ultimately gain a competitive advantage and increase market share, thereby promoting the improvement of operating performance. Although many literature papers conduct in-depth analysis of the company's innovation level, they are based on the economic man hypothesis, ignoring individual subjective factors. In fact, as a social person with emotions, reason, and social needs, managers are affected by various psychological factors.#br#On the one hand, the alumni relation is a social relationship based on academic relationships and has certain cultural specificities, because each university has its own unique culture and historical precipitation, on the other hand, school choice is a subjective choice and has the same educational background, alumni have similar cultural literacy and values, as well as rich professional knowledge. The alumni relationship can better meet the requirements of innovative activities, which is different from the fellow villager relationship and colleague relationship. In capital market, alumni relations have gradually condensed into various alumni circles, which have a huge impact on capital operations. At the same time, the chairman of corporation and the CEO are both the main body of corporate governance, and the social relationship between the two may affect the company's investment in innovation. In view of this, this paper studies the influence of the chairman-general manager alumni relation on the company's innovation investment in order to put forward valuable suggestions.#br#Taking the A-share listed companies in Shanghai and Shenzhen stock markets from 2012 to 2017 as samples, this paper uses the fixed effect model and selects possible factors from corporate finance, corporate governance and CEO personal characteristics as control variables to explore the impact of the chairman CEO alumni relationship on enterprise innovation investment. The results show that: #br#(1)Chairman-CEO alumni relation can significantly promote corporate innovation investment, means the social relationships of managers are playing increasingly important roles in the development of the company. They can restrain the behavior of the chairman and CEO through reputation and social capital, and play part of the corporate governance role. Under the current corporate governance framework, the principal-agent problem has become a constraint to the increase in the company's investment in innovation. If the chairman and general manager have an alumni relation, the above problems can be alleviated to a certain extent. #br#(2) Stronger internal control can significantly strengthen the positive impact between chairman-CEO alumni relation and corporate innovation investment, and more institutional investor shareholding can significantly strengthen the positive impact between chairman-CEO alumni relation and corporate innovation investment, which means companies can suppress the negative impact of the alumni relation by strengthening the company's internal governance mechanisms and improving the company's internal and external governance through market supervision.#br#(3)The positive impact between chairman-CEO alumni relation and corporate innovation investment will be different due to the heterogeneity of ownership and industry, which is stronger in non-state-owned enterprises and high-tech corporations, but the heterogeneity of regional marketization degree doesn't show a significant difference.#br#This paper takes chairman-CEO alumni relation and corporate innovation investment as the research objects, enriching the research on the relationship between this two aspects in particular field. Different from previous literature, this paper innovatively proves that informal relations and social capital have an important influence on individual decision-making, and extends relevant research. The empirical analysis supports the conclusion of the paper and strengthens the empirical research foundation of social capital theory. The research results also have instructive significance for the entrepreneurial activities. Corporations don't have to deliberately avoid this relationship when selecting managers, instead, corporations can use alumni status to enhance top managers' cultural identity and finally obtain more social resources. At the same time, corporations still need to establish and improve theirs' internal control system and improve the external supervision and restraint mechanisms to reduce the adverse effects of alumni relations.#br#

参考文献

[1] 李峰,王亚星.政府补贴对企业生产率的双刃剑效应:基于异质性企业理论和门槛回归方法的研究[J].研究与发展管理,2020,32(1):25-37.
[2] 陈闯,刘天宇.创始经理人、管理层股权分散度与研发决策[J].金融研究,2012,33(7):196-206.
[3] 李文贵,余明桂.民营化企业的股权结构与企业创新[J].管理世界,2015,31(4):112-125.
[4] 钟熙,宋铁波,陈伟宏,等.外资持股、CEO决策视野与企业研发国际化[J].科学学研究,2020,38(3):496-505.
[5] 鞠晓生,卢荻,虞义华.融资约束、营运资本管理与企业创新可持续性[J].经济研究,2013,48(1):4-16.
[6] BARKER V L III,MUELLER G C.CEO characteristics and firm R&D spending[J].Management Science,2002,48(6):782-801.
[7] GINTIS H,BOWLES S,BOYD R,et al.Explaining altruistic behavior in humans[J].Evolution and Human Behavior,2003,24(3):153-172.
[8] 徐细雄,刘星.放权改革、薪酬管制与企业高管腐败[J].管理世界,2013,29(3):119-132.
[9] 赵瑞.企业社会资本、投资机会与投资效率[J].宏观经济研究,2013,35(1):65-72.
[10] 黄丽英,何乐融.高管政治关联和企业创新投入:基于创业板上市公司的实证研究[J].研究与发展管理,2020,32(2):11-23.
[11] 许浩然,荆新.社会关系网络与公司债务违约:基于中国A股上市公司的经验证据[J].财贸经济,2016,37(9):36-52.
[12] 陆瑶,胡江燕.CEO与董事间“老乡”关系对公司违规行为的影响研究[J].南开管理评论,2016,19(2):52-62.
[13] LIN N,ENSEL W M.Life stress and health:stressors and resources[J].American Sociological Review,1989,54(3):382.
[14] 申宇,赵玲,吴风云.创新的母校印记:基于校友圈与专利申请的证据[J].中国工业经济,2017,34(8):156-173.
[15] 黄福广,贾西猛.校友关系、信任与风险投资交易[J].经济管理,2018,40(7):161-177.
[16] 赵文庆, 张馨瑜, 丁娜.CEO与董事间的“校友”关系对企业创新的影响[J].金融学季刊, 2019, 13(4): 1-22.
[17] 周美华,林斌,林东杰.管理层权力、内部控制与腐败治理[J].会计研究,2016,37(3):56-63,96.
[18] 卢馨,方睿孜,郑阳飞.外部治理环境能够抑制企业高管腐败吗[J].经济与管理研究,2015,36(3):30-39.
[19] 林钟高,徐虹,吴玉莲.交易成本与内部控制治理逻辑:基于信任与不确定性的组织内合作视角[J].财经研究,2009,35(2):111-122.
[20] ALTAMURO J,BEATTY A.How does internal control regulation affect financial reporting[J].Journal of Accounting and Economics,2010,49(1-2):58-74.
[21] BARGERON L L,LEHN K M,ZUTTER C J.Sarbanes-oxley and corporate risk-taking[J].Journal of Accounting and Economics,2010,49(1-2):34-52.
[22] 张萌,鲁桂华,张永珅.信息优势、机构投资者异常交易与解禁股减持[J].管理评论,2020,32(3):265-278,288.
[23] 闫红蕾,张自力,赵胜民.资本市场发展对企业创新的影响:基于上市公司股票流动性视角[J].管理评论,2020,32(3):21-36.
[24] SHLEIFER A,VISHNY R W.Large shareholders and corporate control[J].Journal of Political Economy,1986,94(3):461-488.
[25] TIAN X,WANG T Y.Tolerance for failure and corporate innovation[J].Review of Financial Studies,2014,27(1):211-255.
[26] 王小鲁,樊纲,胡李鹏.中国分省份市场化指数报告(2018)[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2019.
文章导航

/