科技人才培育

多源程序公平气氛影响个体创造力的跨层次效应

  • 解志韬
展开
  • (1.上海交通大学 国际与公共事务学院;2.上海交通大学 文科建设处,上海 200240)
解志韬(1982—),男,云南玉溪人,博士,上海交通大学国际与公共事务学院副研究员、硕士生导师,上海交通大学文科建设处副处长兼智库中心常务副主任,研究方向为团队创新与知识管理。

收稿日期: 2021-02-27

  修回日期: 2021-04-26

  网络出版日期: 2021-10-11

基金资助

上海市哲学社会科学规划项目(2020BGL001);上海市软科学重点项目(20692111100)

Cross Level Effects of Multi-foci Procedural Justice Climate from Multiple Perspectives on Individual Creativity

  • Xie Zhitao
Expand
  • (1.School of International and Public Affairs,Shanghai Jiao Tong University; 2.Arts Construction Division,Shanghai Jiao Tong University,Shanghai 200240,China)

Received date: 2021-02-27

  Revised date: 2021-04-26

  Online published: 2021-10-11

摘要

从来源角度探讨组织公平,是对现有多维度公平理论框架的重要补充。基于动机理论中的自我决定理论,以来自20个组织55个团队的250份团队领导与成员配对问卷为样本,探索中国情境下多源程序公平气氛对个体创造力的跨层次影响及作用机理。研究结果显示:不同来源(来源于领导和来源于组织)的程序公平气氛均对个体创造力有显著正向影响;心理授权在来源于领导的程序公平气氛和来源于组织的程序公平气氛对个体创造力的跨层次影响中均发挥中介作用;权力距离在来源于组织的程序公平气氛与员工心理授权的关系间起调节作用,即权力距离越高,来源于组织的程序公平气氛对员工心理授权的影响越强。

本文引用格式

解志韬 . 多源程序公平气氛影响个体创造力的跨层次效应[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2021 , 38(19) : 129 -136 . DOI: 10.6049/kjjbydc.2020120856

Abstract

To explore organizational justice from the perspective of source is an important supplement to the existing multi-dimensional framework of equity theoretical. Based on the self-determination theory of motivation theory, this paper takes 55 teams from 20 organizations and 250 team leaders and members as samples and discusses the cross level effects and mechanism of Multi-foci procedural justice climate on individual creativity in China. The result shows that different sources of the procedural justice climate (both the leader focused and the organizational focused) have significant positive impacts on individual creativity. Both the positive cross level effects of leader focused and of organizational focused procedural justice climate on individual creativity are mediated by employee psychological empowerment. Power distance has a positive moderating effect on the relationship between organizational focused procedural justice climate and employee psychological empowerment, which means for employees with high power distance, the relationship between organizational procedural justice climate and psychological empowerment is stronger.

参考文献

[1] 邓志华,肖小虹,陈江涛.员工创造力激发研究评述:多层次多视角机制与精神性动力[J].科技进步与对策,2020,37(13):151-160.
[2] CHANG S,JIA L D,TAKEUCHI R,et al. Do high-commitment work systems affect creativity? a multilevel combinational approach to employee creativity[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology,2014,99(4):665-680.
[3] MA Z X,LONG L R,ZHANG Y,et al. Why do high-performance human resource practices matter for team creativity? the mediating role of collective efficacy and knowledge sharing[J]. Asia Pacific Journal of Management,2017,34(3):565-586.
[4] 江宏飞,高建平,周伟.公共卫生事件下中医药应急科研体系的构建——基于中医药应对新冠疫情的案例分析[J].科研管理,2020,41(9):160-169.
[5] 陈冲,余彩婷,张佳.从组织公平到创业团队创造力的双中介路径检验:基于社会惰性与团队效能视角[J/OL]. 科技进步与对策:1-8[2021-02-21].http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/42.1224.G3.20201218.1059.010.html.
[6] KHAZANCHI S,MASTERSON S S. Who and what is fair matters:a multi-foci social exchange model of creativity[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior,2011,32(1):86-106.
[7] SCHEPERS P,BERG P T. Social factors of work-environment creativity[J]. Journal of Business and Psychology,2007,21(3):407-428.
[8] 李厚锐,解志韬,田新民. 中国背景下多视角公平的结构测量及其作用机制研究[J]. 上海管理科学,2013,35(3):41-45.
[9] LAVELLE J J,RUPP D E,BROCKNER J. Taking a multifoci approach to the study of justice,social exchange,and citizenship behavior:the target similarity model[J]. Journal of Management,2007,33(6):841-866.
[10] NAUMANN S E, BENNETT N. A case for procedural justice climate:development and test of a multilevel model[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2000,43(5):881-889.
[11] GAGNE M,DECI E L.Self-determination theory and work motivation[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior,2005,26(4):331-362.
[12] WANG J, WANG H. The influences of psychological empowerment on work attitude and behavior in Chinese organizations[J]. Journal of Business Management, 2012,30(6):938-947.
[13] ALGE B J,BALLINGER G A,TANGIRALA S,et al. Information privacy in organizations:empowering creative and extrarole performance[J]. The Journal of Applied Psychology,2006,91(1):221-232.
[14] 谢俊,储小平,汪林. 效忠主管与员工工作绩效的关系:反馈寻求行为和权力距离的影响[J]. 南开管理评论,2012,15(2):31-38,58.
[15] 梁建. 道德领导与员工建言:一个调节-中介模型的构建与检验[J]. 心理学报,2014,46(2):252-264.
[16] LEUNG K,SMITH P B,WANG Z M,et al. Job satisfaction in joint venture hotels in China:an organizational justice analysis[J]. Journal of International Business Studies,1996,27(5):947-962.
[17] ZHANG X M,BARTOL K M. Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity:the influence of psychological empowerment,intrinsic motivation,and creative process engagement[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2010,53(1):107-128.
[18] 严瑜,张振嘉. 组织公平在多层辱虐管理中的角色:基于道德排除理论的多视角分析[J]. 心理科学进展,2017,25(1):145-155.
[19] 朱其权,龙立荣. 甄选程序公平感的来源及其负面溢出效应[J]. 管理科学,2012,25(2):33-40.
[20] 张永军. 伦理型领导对员工反生产行为的影响:基于社会学习与社会交换双重视角[J]. 商业经济与管理,2012,31(12):23-32.
[21] ATWATER L,CARMELI A. Leader-member exchange,feelings of energy,and involvement in creative work[J]. The Leadership Quarterly,2009,20(3):264-275.
[22] GEORGE J M,ZHOU J. Dual tuning in a supportive context:joint contributions of positive mood,negative mood,and supervisory behaviors to employee creativity[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2007,50(3):605-622.
[23] 姚艳虹,韩树强. 组织公平与人格特质对员工创新行为的交互影响研究[J]. 管理学报,2013,10(5):700-707.
[24] 张滨滨,张同建.组织公平、知识资本开发与技术创新能力的相关性研究——基于高科技中小风险企业的数据检验[J].科技进步与对策,2011,28(15):130-135.
[25] 李燕萍, 吴丹. 程序公平对员工工作投入影响的研究——状态焦虑与上下级沟通的作用[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2016, 37(5):138-149.
[26] 凌淼,余璇,张芸子. 人力资源管理强度对科技企业知识型员工创新绩效的影响[J].科技进步与对策,2021,38(8):153-160.
[27] 张银,李燕萍.领导风格、心理授权与员工创造力:基于中国电力行业的实证研究[J]. 科技进步与对策,2011,28(21):140-146.
[28] 〖JP+3〗SPREITZER G M. Psychological, empowerment in the workplace:dimensions,measurement and validation[J]. Academy of Management Journal,1995,38(5):1442-1465.
[29] SPREITZER G M. Social structural characteristics of psychological empowerment[J]. Academy of Management Journal,1996,39(2):483-504.
[30] 解志韬,王辰轩. 科研团队授权型领导对交互记忆系统的影响研究[J]. 中国科技论坛,2020,36(11):137-146.
[31] CROPANZANO R,BYRNE Z S,BOBOCEL D R,et al. Moral virtues,fairness heuristics,social entities,and other denizens of organizational justice[J]. Journal of Vocational Behavior,2001,58(2):164-209.
[32] 叶宝娟,李露,夏扉,等. 农村幼儿教师的组织公平感与其职业倦怠的关系:心理授权的中介作用与家庭支持的调节作用[J]. 心理科学,2020,43(1):125-131.
[33] GEORGE J M. 9 creativity in organizations[J]. Academy of Management Annals,2007,1(1):439-477.
[34] SHALLEY C E,ZHOU J,OLDHAM G R. The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity:where should we go from here[J]. Journal of Management,2004,30(6):933-958.
[35] SHALLEY C E,GILSON L L.What leaders need to know: a review of social and contextual factors that can foster or hinder creativity[J]. The Leadership Quarterly,2004,15(1):33-53.
[36] 陈亮,沈文竹,郑伟波,等. 自我赋能时代背景下“心理授权”的三十年研究述评[J]. 中国人力资源开发,2019,36(3):37-52.
[37] 常涛,董丹丹. 地位冲突对团队创造力的影响:共享内在动机视角[J]. 科技进步与对策,2019,36(20):144-153.
[38] KHATRI N. Consequences of power distance orientation in organisations[J]. Vision:the Journal of Business Perspective,2009,13(1):1-9.
[39] YUANWANG K R,ZAMANTILI NAYIR D. Procedural justice,participation and power distance[J]. Management Research Review,2009,33(1):66-78.
[40] 张宗贺,刘帮成.服务型领导、互动公平与员工责任行为创新研究——权力距离的调节作用[J].科技进步与对策,2018,35(20):144-150.
[41] COLQUITT J A. On the dimensionality of organizational justice:a construct validation of a measure[J]. The Journal of Applied Psychology,2001,86(3):386-400.
[42] ZHOU J,GEORGE J M. When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity:encouraging the expression of voice[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2001,44(4):682-696.
[43] DORFMAN P W, HOWELL J P. Dimensions of national culture and effective leadership patterns: hofstede revisited[J]. Advances in International Comparative Management, 1988, 3(1): 127-150.
[44] 王重鸣. 心理学研究方法[M]. 北京:人民教育出版社,2000.
[45] BARON R M, KENNY D A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research:conceptual,strategic,and statistical considerations[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1986,51(6):1173-1182.
文章导航

/