企业创新管理

如何使供应商参与绿色产品创新更有效——参与模式及治理形式适配的作用

  • 李勃 ,
  • 徐慧 ,
  • 和征
展开
  • (1.西安工程大学 管理学院;2.一带一路纺织发展创新研究院,陕西 西安 710048)
李勃(1986—),男,甘肃平凉人,博士,西安工程大学管理学院副教授,一带一路纺织发展创新研究院研究员,研究方向为企业产品创新管理、供应商管理;徐慧(1997—),女,山东威海人,西安工程大学管理学院硕士研究生,研究方向为企业产品创新管理、供应商管理;和征(1978—),男,陕西澄城人,博士,西安工程大学管理学院副教授,一带一路纺织发展创新研究院研究员,研究方向为服务型制造、物流与供应链管理。

收稿日期: 2021-05-13

  修回日期: 2021-06-09

  网络出版日期: 2021-09-30

基金资助

国家自然科学基金项目(71802155);教育部人文社会科学研究项目(20XJA630001);陕西省软科学研究计划项目(2021KRM177);陕西省教育厅智库内涵建设项目(20JT029,20JT025)

How to Make Supplier Involvement in Green Product Innovation More Effectively:the Role of the Adaptation of Involvement Modes and Governance Forms

  • Li Bo ,
  • Xu Hui ,
  • He Zheng
Expand
  • (1. School of Management,Xi'an Polytechnic University,Xi'an 710048,China;2.The Institute of Belt and Road Textile Development and Innovation,Xi'an 710048,China)

Received date: 2021-05-13

  Revised date: 2021-06-09

  Online published: 2021-09-30

摘要

供应商参与作为一种供应链企业间的价值共创活动,对制造企业绿色产品创新意义重大。基于交易成本理论和社会交换理论,在揭示供应商参与模式与供应商治理形式间的适配对供应商参与绿色产品创新效能影响的基础上,引入供应商关系专用型投资,揭示参与模式—治理形式间适配与供应商参与效能间的转换机制。来自246家制造业企业样本的实证研究表明,当对外包型供应商参与采用正式化控制、协作型供应商参与采用社会化控制、咨询型供应商参与采用互补双元控制时,有助于供应商参与效能提高;供应商关系专用型投资在供应商参与模式—治理形式适配和供应商参与效能的关系间起不同程度的桥梁作用。

本文引用格式

李勃 , 徐慧 , 和征 . 如何使供应商参与绿色产品创新更有效——参与模式及治理形式适配的作用[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2021 , 38(18) : 114 -123 . DOI: 10.6049/kjjbydc.2021050360

Abstract

As a value co-creation activity among supply chain,supplier involvement is of great significance to the green product innovation of manufacturing enterprises.Based on the transaction costs theory and social exchange theory,this research analyses the effects of the fit between supplier involvement mode and supplier governance form(SIM-SGF fit) on supplier involvement effectiveness,and further explores the transformation mechanisms between SIM-SGF fit and supplier involvement effectiveness by supplier relationship-specific investments.The empirical study from 246 manufacturing firms shows that outsourcing supplier involvement with formal control,collaborative supplier involvement with social control,and inquiring supplier involvement with orthogonality ambidextrous control are conducive to improve supplier involvement effectiveness.Supplier relationship-specific investments play differently mediating roles in the main effects of SIM-SGF fit on supplier involvement effectiveness.

参考文献

[1] 任胜钢,项秋莲,何朵军.自愿型环境规制会促进企业绿色创新吗?以ISO14001标准为例[J].研究与发展管理,2018,30(6):1-11.
[2] LEE V H,OOI K B,CHONG A Y L,et al.A structural analysis of greening the supplier,environmental performance and competitive advantage[J].Production Planning & Control,2015,26(2):116-130.
[3] 李勃,和征,李随成.供应商参与绿色产品创新中的权力组合策略研究基于资源动员视角[J].研究与发展管理,2020,32(4):84-96.
[4] WANG Q W,HUO B F,ZHAO X D.What makes logistics integration more effective? governance from contractual and relational perspectives[J].Journal of Business Logistics,2020,41(3):259-281.
[5] 李勃,王丛迪,和征.绿色产品协同创新中契约形式对供应商创新性的影响——供应商绿色创新资源优先配置的中介及产品复杂性与技术新颖性的调节[EB/OL].[2021-07-12].http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/42.1224.g3.20210203.1440.004.html.
[6] ZHANG M H,ZENG W J,TSE Y K,et al.Examining the antecedents and consequences of green product innovation[J].Industrial Marketing Management,2021(93):413-427.
[7] ZHANG Q,PAN J,FENG T.Green supplier integration and environmental performance: do environmental innovation and ambidextrous governance matter[J].International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management,2020,50(7/8):693-719.
[8] LIN L H,HO Y L.Ambidextrous governance and alliance performance under dynamic environments:an empirical investigation of Taiwanese technology alliances[J].Technovation,2021,103:102240.
[9] LE DAIN M A,MERMINOD V.A knowledge sharing framework for black,grey and white box supplier configurations in new product development[J].Technovation,2014,34(11):688-701.
[10] CHENG C C J.Sustainability orientation,green supplier involvement,and green innovation performance:evidence from diversifying green entrants[J].Journal of Business Ethics,2020,161(2):393-414.
[11] CLAUSS T,BOUNCKEN R B.Social power as an antecedence of governance in buyer-supplier alliances[J].Industrial Marketing Management,2019, 77:75-89.
[12] 张延涛.供应商适应行为影响因素的作用机理研究[J].管理评论,2017,29(2):168-180.
[13] DAI J,CANTOR D E,MONTABON F L.How environmental management competitive pressure affects a focal firm's environmental innovation activities:a green supply chain perspective[J].Journal of Business Logistics,2015,36(3):242-259.
[14] PETERSEN K J,HANDFIELD R B,RAGATZ G L.Supplier integration into new product development:coordinating product,process and supply chain design[J].Journal of Operations Management,2005,23(3-4):371-388.
[15] LILIANI,TJAHJONO B,CAO D M.Advancing bioplastic packaging products through co-innovation:a conceptual framework for supplier-customer collaboration[J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2020, 252:119861.
[16] MELANDER L.Customer and supplier collaboration in green product innovation:external and internal capabilities[J].Business Strategy and the Environment,2018,27(6):677-693.
[17] ZHANG J,ZHANG Y,DU M.The impact of relative governance on B2B firms' value appropriation from industrial buyer-seller relationships: empirical evidence from China[J].Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing,2021, 36(2): 230-243.
[18] ZHANG Q,JIN J L,YANG D.How to enhance supplier performance in China: interplay of contracts,relational governance and legal development[J].International Journal of Operations & Production Management,2020,40(6):777-808.
[19] UM K H,OH J Y.The interplay of governance mechanisms in supply chain collaboration and performance in buyer-supplier dyads: substitutes or complements[J].International Journal of Operations & Production Management,2020,40(4):415-438.
[20] CHEN Q,SEURING S,WAGNER R.A review of inter-firm relationship quality in supply chains[J].Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing,2020,ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print).
[21] WAGNER S M,BODE C.Supplier relationship-specific investments and the role of safeguards for supplier innovation sharing[J].Journal of Operations Management,2014,32(3):65-78.
[22] 李维安,李勇建,石丹.供应链治理理论研究:概念、内涵与规范性分析框架[J].南开管理评论,2016,19(1):4-15,42.
[23] PULLES N J,LOOHUIS R P A.Managing buyer-supplier conflicts:the effect of buyer openness and directness on A supplier's willingness to adapt[J].Journal of Supply Chain Management,2020,56(4):65-81.
[24] BARBOSA A P P L,SALERNO M S,BRASIL V C,et al.Coordination approaches to foster open innovation R&D projects performance[J].Journal of Engineering and Technology Management,2020(58):101603.
[25] SHOU Y,LI Y,PARK Y W,et al.The impact of product complexity and variety on supply chain integration[J].International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management,2017,47(4): 297-317.
[26] HUANG M C,CHIU Y P.Relationship governance mechanisms and collaborative performance:a relational life-cycle perspective[J].Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management,2018,24(3):260-273.
[27] YAN T T,DOOLEY K.Buyer-supplier collaboration quality in new product development projects[J].Journal of Supply Chain Management,2014,50(2):59-83.
[28] CHI R,ZHANG J,DENG G.How cooperative innovation could be more effective in China: a relationship perspective[J].Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing,2021,36(8): 1358-1370.
[29] KHAN I,EILERT M.The varying impact of buyer and supplier expected relationship-specific investments on relationship governance[J].Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing,2021, 36(6): 905-916.
[30] HARMANCIOGLU N,WUYTS S,OZTURAN P.Governance implications of modularity in sourcing relationships[J].Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,2021,49(3):601-625.
[31] LIU Y,LUO Y D,LIU T.Governing buyer-supplier relationships through transactional and relational mechanisms:Evidence from China[J].Journal of Operations Management,2009,27(4):294-309.
[32] ARRANZ N,DE ARROYABE J C F.Effect of formal contracts,relational norms and trust on performance of joint research and development projects[J].British Journal of Management,2012,23(4):575-588.
文章导航

/