科技管理创新

制度距离与跨国合作创新绩效——文化严格程度的调节作用

  • 李琳 ,
  • 郭立宏
展开
  • (1.西安理工大学 经济与管理学院,陕西 西安 710048;2.西北大学 经济管理学院,陕西 西安 710069)
李琳(1988—),女,陕西宝鸡人,西安理工大学经济与管理学院博士研究生,研究方向为技术创新与跨文化管理;郭立宏(1962—),男,陕西渭南人,博士,西北大学经济管理学院教授、博士生导师,研究方向为技术创新管理。

收稿日期: 2020-08-28

  修回日期: 2020-10-02

  网络出版日期: 2021-05-10

基金资助

国家自然科学基金项目(71962033)

Institutional Distance and Performance of Cross national Cooperative Innovation: Moderating Role of Cultural Tightness

  • Li Lin ,
  • Guo Lihong
Expand
  • (1.School of Economic and Management, Xi'an University of Technology, Xi'an 710048, China;2.School of Economic and Management, Northwest University, Xi'an 710069, China)

Received date: 2020-08-28

  Revised date: 2020-10-02

  Online published: 2021-05-10

摘要

国家间差异是影响跨国合作创新的关键因素,然而,已有文献较少涉及国家制度和文化差异影响研究。试图从国家制度和文化视角探讨国家间差异对跨国合作创新的影响。在区分正式制度距离与非正式制度距离的基础上,采用2005—2019年17个国家相互之间共同发明专利数据,实证分析两类制度距离对跨国合作创新绩效的影响,并进一步检验文化严格程度在这一影响过程中的调节作用。研究表明,正式制度距离和非正式制度距离均对跨国合作创新绩效具有显著负向影响;文化严格程度减弱了正式制度距离的影响,却增强了个人主义/集体主义和长期导向/短期导向两个维度上非正式制度距离的影响,但对其它维度和总体非正式制度距离影响的调节作用并不显著。结论不仅揭示了不同国家文化环境下制度距离对跨国合作创新绩效的影响机制,还可为各国制定跨国合作创新战略以及我国应对中美科技合作挑战提供理论指导和参考。

本文引用格式

李琳 , 郭立宏 . 制度距离与跨国合作创新绩效——文化严格程度的调节作用[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2021 , 38(9) : 16 -25 . DOI: 10.6049/kjjbydc.2020080762

Abstract

The differences between countries are the key factors affecting cross-national cooperative innovation, however, there are few research referring to the influence of national institutional and cultural differences.This paper attempts to discuss the influence of differences between countries on cross-national cooperative innovation from the perspective of national institution and culture.Based on distinguished formal institutional distance from informal institutional distance, by using data on joint patent invention among 17 countries from 2005 to 2019, the effect of the two kinds of institutional distance on cross-national cooperative innovation performance is empirically analyzed, and the moderating role of cultural tightness in the influence process is further examined.The results show that the formal institutional distance and the informal institutional distance both have a significant negative impact on cross-national cooperative innovation performance, and the culture tightness reduces the effect of informal institutional distance, on the contrary, heightens the effect of the two dimensions of informal institutional distance including individualism/collectivism and long-term orientation/short-term orientation.Nevertheless, the moderating role of cultural tightness on the effect of the other dimensions and the overall informal institutional distance is not significant.The results not only reveal the influence mechanism of institutional distance on cross-national cooperative innovation performance in different cultural environments, but also provide theoretical guidance and reference for countries to formulate cross-national cooperative innovation strategies and for China to address the challenges of scientific and technological cooperation between China and the United States.

参考文献

[1] 任洪源,刘刚,罗永泰.知识资源、研发投入与企业跨境创新绩效关系研究——基于面板数据门限回归的实证分析[J].管理评论,2017,29(1):105-112.
[2] PETRUZZELLI A M.The impact of technological relatedness, prior ties, and geographical distance on university-industry collaborations: a joint-patent analysis[J].Technovation, 2011, 31(7): 309-319.
[3] 向希尧,蔡虹,裴云龙.跨国专利合作网络中技术接近性的调节作用研究[J].管理科学,2015,28(1):111-121.
[4] BERRY H, GUILLN M F, ZHOU N.An institutional approach to cross-national distance[J].Journal of International Business Studies, 2010, 41(9): 1460-1480.
[5] BOSCHMA R A. Proximity and innovation:a critical assessment[J].Regional Studies, 2005, 39(1): 61-74.
[6] BALLAND P-A.Proximity and the evolution of collaboration networks: evidence from research and development projects within the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) industry[J].Regional Studies, 2012, 46 (6): 741-756.
[7] HOFSTEDE G, MINKOV M.Cultures and organizations: software of the mind [M].New York: McGraw-Hill, 2010.
[8] HUSSLER C.Culture and knowledge spillovers in Europe: new perspectives for innovation and convergence policies[J].Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 2004, 13 (6):523-541.
[9] GAUR A S, DELIOS A, SINGH K.Institutional environments, staffing strategies, and subsidiary performance[J].Journal of Management, 2007, 33(4): 611-636.
[10] BJRKMAN I, STAHL G K, VAARA E.Cultural differences and capability transfer in cross-border acquisitions: the mediating roles of capability complementarily, absorptive capacity, and social integration[J].Journal of International Business Studies, 2007, 38(4): 658-672.
[11] LEUNG K, MORRIS M W.Values, schemas, and norms in the culture-behavior nexus: a situated dynamics framework[J].Journal of International Business Studies, 2015, 46(9): 1028-1050.
[12] GELFAND M J, NISHII L H, RAVER J L.On the nature and importance of cultural tightness-looseness[J].Journal of Applied Psychology, 2006, 91(6): 1225-1244.
[13] SHIN D, HASSE V, SCHOTTER A.Multinational enterprises within cultural space and place: integrating cultural distance and cultural tightness-looseness[J].Academy of Management Journal, 2016, 59(5): 1-39.
[14] CHUA R Y J, ROTH Y, LEMOINE J-F.The impact of culture on creativity: how cultural tightness and cultural distance affect global innovation crowdsourcing work[J].Administrative Science Quarterly, 2015, 60(2): 189-227.
[15] BEUGELSDIJK S, SLANGEN A, MASELAND R, et al.The impact of home-host cultural differences on foreign affiliate sales:the moderating role of cultural variation within host countries[J].Journal of Business Research, 2014, 67(8): 1638-1646.
[16] NORTH D C.Institutions, institutional change and economic performance[M].Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
[17] KOSTOVA T, ZAHEER S.Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: the case of the multinational enterprise[J].Academy of Management Review, 1999, 24(1): 64-81.
[18] ESTRIN S, BAGHDASARYAN D, MEYER K E.The impact of institutional and human resource distance on international entry strategies[J].Journal of Management Studies, 2009, 46(7): 1171-1196.
[19] 陈怀超,范建红,牛冲槐.基于制度距离的中国跨国公司进入战略选择:合资还是独资[J].管理评论,2013,25(12):98-111.
[20] XU D, PAN Y, BEAMISH P W.The effect of regulative and normative distances on MNE ownership and expatriate strategies[J].Management International Review, 2004, 44(3): 285-307.
[21] 曾伏娥,刘红翠,王长征.制度距离、组织认同与企业机会主义行为研究[J].管理学报,2016,13(2):203-211.
[22] SCHWENS C, EICHE J, KABST R.The moderating impact of informal institutional distance and formal institutional risk on SME entry mode choice[J].Journal of Management Studies, 2011, 48(2): 330-351.
[23] PELTO P J.The difference between "tight" and "loose" societies[J].Transaction, 1968, 5: 37-40.
[24] GELFAND M J, RAVER J L, NISHII L H, et al.Differences between tight and loose cultures: a 33-nation study[J].Science, 2011, 332(6033): 1100-1104.
[25] DIKOVA D, SAHIB P R, VAN WITTELOOSTUIJN A.Cross-border acquisition abandonment and completion: the effect of institutional differences and organizational learning in the international business service industry, 1981-2001[J].Journal of International Business Studies, 2010, 41(2): 223-245.
[26] CHAO M C-H, KUMAR V.The impact of institutional distance on the international diversity-performance relationship[J].Journal of World Business, 2010, 45(1): 93-103.
[27] 李雪灵,万妮娜.跨国企业的合法性门槛:制度距离的视角[J].管理世界,2016,32(5):184-185.
[28] DOW D, KARUNARATNA A.Developing a multidimensional instrument to measure psychic distance stimuli[J].Journal of International Business Studies, 2006, 37(5): 578-602.
[29] CHANG Y, KAO M, KUO A, et al.How cultural distance influences entry mode choice: the contingent role of host country's governance quality[J].Journal of Business Research, 2012, 65 (8):1160-1170.
[30] SCHOORMAN F D, MAYER R C, DAVIS J H.An integrative model of organizational trust: past, present, and future[J].Academy of Management Review, 2007, 32(2): 344-354.
[31] SRENSEN J B.The strength of corporate culture and reliability of firm performance[J].Administrative Science Quarterly, 2002, 47(1): 70-91.
[32] HIGGINS E T.The “self digest”: self-knowledge serving self-regulatory functions[J].Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1996, 71(6): 1062-1083.
[33] O'REILLY C A, CHATMAN J, CALDWELL D F.People and organizational culture: a profile comparison approach to assessing person-organization fit[J].Academy of Management Journal, 1991, 34(3): 487-516.
[34] TOH S M, DENISI A S.A local perspective to expatriate success[J].Academy of Management Executive, 2005, 19(1): 132-146.
[35] SINGH J.Collaborative networks as determinants of knowledge diffusion patterns[J].Management Science, 2005, 51(5): 756-770.
[36] HOFSTEDE G.Culture's consequence:international differences in work-related values[M].California: Sage Publications, 1980.
[37] KOGUT B, SINGH H.The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode[J].Journal of International Business Studies, 1988, 19(3): 411-432.
[38] JAFFE A B, TRAJTENBERG M, HENDERSON R.Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations[J].The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1993, 108(3): 577-598.
[39] HAUSMAN J A, HALL B H, GRILICHES Z.Econometric models for count data with an application to the patent-R&D relationship[J].Econometrica, 1984, 52(4): 909-938.
[40] TARAS V, STEEL P, KIRKMAN B L.Does country equal culture? beyond geography in the search for cultural boundaries[J].Management International Review, 2016, 56(4): 455-487.
[41] BEUGELSDIJK S, KOSTOVA T, ROTH K.An overview of Hofstede-inspired country-level culture research in international business since 2006[J].Journal of International Business Studies, 2016, 48(1): 30-47.
文章导航

/