科技法制与政策

资本回报率增长的最优知识产权保护强度研究——基于82个国家面板数据的实证

  • 杨君 ,
  • 詹舒琴 ,
  • 肖明月 ,
  • 蒋墨冰
展开
  • (1.浙江理工大学 经济管理学院,浙江 杭州 310018;2.上海外国语大学 国际金融贸易学院,上海 200083;3.浙江金融职业学院 投资与保险学院,浙江 杭州 310018)
杨君(1984—),男,安徽宿州人,博士,浙江理工大学经济管理学院副教授,研究方向为资本回报率与技术创新;詹舒琴(1997—),女,浙江衢州人,上海外国语大学国际金融贸易学院硕士研究生,研究方向为国际技术贸易;肖明月(1985—),女,安徽无为人,浙江金融职业学院投资与保险学院副教授,研究方向为国际投资;蒋墨冰(1988—),女,浙江衢州人,浙江理工大学经济管理学院讲师,研究方向为跨国并购与投资。本文通讯作者:蒋墨冰。

收稿日期: 2020-04-28

  修回日期: 2020-08-27

  网络出版日期: 2021-03-17

基金资助

浙江省社会科学规划重点项目(20NDJC30Z);教育部人文社会科学青年项目(17YJC790062);浙江省自然科学青年项目(LQ20G030001)

Research on the Optimal Intensity of Intellectual Property Protection for the Growth of Capital Return

  • Yang Jun ,
  • Zhan Shuqin ,
  • Xiao Mingyue ,
  • Jiang Mobing
Expand
  • (1.School of Economics and Management, Zhejiang Sci-technology University, Hangzhou 310018,China;2.School of International Finance and Trade, Shanghai Foreign Studies University, Shanghai 200083, China;3.School of Investment and Insurance, Zhejiang Finance Vocational College,Hangzhou 310018, China)

Received date: 2020-04-28

  Revised date: 2020-08-27

  Online published: 2021-03-17

摘要

基于制度层面分析资本回报率变动的动因有助于探索经济增长新动力。计算82个国家的资本回报率,并基于知识产权保护视角对其变动机制进行分析,得出以下主要结论:①资本回报率增长存在最优知识产权保护强度,但发展中国家的理论最优强度小于发达国家;②发展中国家知识产权保护以远离最优强度状态促进资本回报率提升,发达国家则以接近最优强度状态促进资本回报率提升;③金融危机后,知识产权保护的促进效应在发展中国家更加明显,在发达国家有所弱化;④机制分析显示,知识产权保护通过促进技术创新提升资本回报率。

本文引用格式

杨君 , 詹舒琴 , 肖明月 , 蒋墨冰 . 资本回报率增长的最优知识产权保护强度研究——基于82个国家面板数据的实证[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2021 , 38(4) : 104 -113 . DOI: 10.6049/kjjbydc.2020040842

Abstract

Analyzing the motivation of the change of capital return based on the institutional level is helpful to explore the new driving force of economic growth.This paper measures capital return of 82 countries, and analyses its change mechanism from the perspective of intellectual property protection, conclusions are as follows: there is an optimal intensity of intellectual property protection for the growth of capital return, and the theoretical optimum intensity in developing countries is less than that in developed countries; intellectual property protection in developing countries promotes the capital return in a state far from "optimal intensity", while in developed countries it promotes capital return in a state close to "optimal intensity"; the effect of intellectual property protection is more prominent in developing countries and weakened in developed countries after the financial crisis; mechanisms analysis shows that intellectual property protection promotes capital return by promoting technological innovation.

参考文献

[1] HELPMAN E.Innovation, imitation and intellectual property rights[J].Econometrica, 1993, 61(6):1247-1280.
[2] 杨轶波.增强知识产权保护总能促进创新吗:纳入“干中学”效应的南北框架分析[J].世界经济研究,2018,37(12):115-134
[3] 黄先海, 杨君, 肖明月.资本深化、技术进步与资本回报率:基于美国的经验分析[J].世界经济,2012,35(9):3-20.
[4] NORTH D C.The rise of the western world: a new economic history[J].Contemporary Sociology, 1973, 27(4):38-38.
[5] 杨君,黄先海,肖明月.金融发展、投资扩张模式与中国的资本回报率[J].经济理论与经济管理,2018,38(2):81-97.
[6] DIAS M F P, PEDROZO E A,SILVA T N.The innovation process as a complex structure with multilevel rules[J].Journal of Evolutionary Economics,2014,24(5):1067-1084.
[7] ACEMOUGLU D, ROBINSON J A.Why nations fail: the origins of power, prosperity, and poverty[M].New York: Crown Business,2012.
[8] BAUMOL W J, HEIM P, MALKIEL B G, et al.Earnings retention, new capital and the growth of the girm[J].Review of Economics and Statistics, 1970,52(4):345-355.
[9] BAI C E, HSIEH C T, QIAN Y.The return to capital in China[J].Social Science Electronic Publishing,2006(2):61-88.
[10] 柏培文,许捷.中国三大产业的资本存量、资本回报率及其收敛性:1978-2013[J].经济学(季刊),2018(3):1171-1206.
[11] 刘仁和, 陈英楠, 吉晓萌,等.中国的资本回报率:基于q理论的估算[J].经济研究,2018,64(6):69-83.
[12] 孙文凯, 肖耿, 杨秀科.资本回报率对投资率的影响:中美日对比研究[J].世界经济,2010,33(6):3-24.
[13] CASELLI F, FEYRER J.The marginal product of capital[J].The Quarterly Journal of Economics,2007, 122(2):535-568.
[14] GORDON R J.Economic growth since 1870: what we know and still need to know[J].American Economic Review, 1999,89(2):320-352.
[15] SONG Z, STORESLETTEN K, ZILIBOTTI F.Growing like China[J].American Economic Review, 2011,101(2):196-233.
[16] 刘晓光, 苟琴.劳动力转移、技术进步与资本回报率变动[J].产业经济研究,2017,16(2):80-91.
[17] 许捷,柏培文.中国资本回报率嬗变之谜[J].中国工业经济,2017,34(7):45-63.
[18] 尹志锋,叶静怡,黄阳华,等.知识产权保护与企业创新:传导机制及其检验[J].世界经济,2013,36(12):111-129.
[19] MOSER P.Innovation without patents: evidence fromworld's fairs[J].The Journal of Law and Economics, 2012, 55(1):43-74.
[20] SCOTCHMER S.The political economy of intellectual property treaties[J].Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 2004, 20(2): 415-437.
[21] 王华.更严厉的知识产权保护制度有利于技术创新吗[J].经济研究,2011,57(2):124-135.
[22] 李平,宫旭红,齐丹丹.中国最优知识产权保护区间研究:基于自主研发及国际技术引进的视角[J].南开经济研究,2013,29(3):123-138.
[23] MASKUS K E, YANG L.The impacts of post-TRIPS patent reforms on the structure of exports[R].RIETI Discussion Paper Series, 2013.
[24] CANALS C, SENER F.Offshoring and intellectual property rights reform[J].Journal of Development Economics, 2014, 108(5):17-31.
[25] 余骁,郭志芳.知识产权保护对全球价值链分工收益的影响:基于跨国行业面板数据的经验分析[J].中南财经政法大学学报,2017,60(6):143-153.
[26] 戴魁早.技术市场发展对出口技术复杂度的影响及其作用机制[J].中国工业经济,2018,35(7):119-137.
[27] 唐保庆,邱斌,孙少勤.中国服务业增长的区域失衡研究[J].经济研究,2018,64(8):149-164.
文章导航

/