|
|
|
| The Measurement and Spatial-temporal Evolution Characteristics of the Reform Effect for Streamlining Administration, Delegating Power, Strengthening Regulation and Optimizing Service of Sci-tech in China |
| Shen Yunxing1,Li Chengen2 |
| (1.School of Marxism, Northeastern University,ShenYang 110000,China;2.Dalian University of Technology,DaLian 116024,China) |
|
|
|
Abstract Since the 19th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, China has issued a series of policy documents to continuously deepen the reform of the sci-tech innovation system and promote the continuous improvement of the overall effectiveness of the national innovation system. The government has stressed that it is necessary to optimize the management of scientific research projects and funds, improve the evaluation incentive system conducive to innovation, strengthen the performance evaluation of scientific research projects, improve the hierarchical accountability mechanism, and carry out the pilot reform of scientific research management based on integrity and ability. Then what are the effects of the current sci-tech decentralization, regulation and service reform in China? What are the characteristics of space-time evolution? Are there differences in the effects of this reform in different regions, and what are the incentives for the differences?
In order to answer the above questions, first of all, this study takes 31 provinces in China from 2015 to 2020 as the research object, establishes the evaluation index system of the reform effect of streamlining administration, delegating power, strengthening regulation and optimizing service in China, and obtains the comprehensive index of the reform effect at the national and regional levels. Secondly, according to the comprehensive index of the effect of the reform in each region, the dynamic distribution law of the reform effects is analyzed by using the nonparametric density estimation method. The Dagum Gini coefficient and its decomposition are used to quantify the evolution characteristics and sources of the differences in the effects of China′s reform of streamlining administration, delegating power, strengthening regulation and optimizing service. By using the σ convergence model and β convergence model to explore whether the regions with poor reform effect can be adjusted and improved in a short time within the research cycle. Finally, the paper uses Moran′s I index to describe the spatial agglomeration characteristics of the reform effect.
It is concluded that firstly, the effect of the reform of streamlining administration, delegating power, strengthening regulation and optimizing service in China is on the rise at the national and regional levels, and there are significant stage characteristics. Secondly, from the perspective of dynamic distribution characteristics, there are differences in the distribution of non-parametric nuclear density curves between China and various regions. Among them, the effect of the reform at the national and regional levels is on the rise. Thirdly, from the perspective of the difference degree, the Gini coefficient of the whole country and all regions shows a downward trend of fluctuation. In terms of difference sources, inter-regional contribution is the largest, followed by intra-regional contribution, and the hypervariable density is the weakest. Fourthly, from the perspective of convergence characteristics, the coefficients of variation of the whole country and all regions support the σ convergence hypothesis and the absolute β convergence mechanism shows that this reform effect in China is in a balanced development trend. It is the spatial agglomeration characteristics of low-high or high-low combination of the reform effect with the characteristics of steady distribution.
Therefore it is necessary to improve the multi-level market regulation system, give play to the regulatory role of the market in the field of science and technology, and realize the combination of regulation and supervision in scientific and technological innovation; it is also important to promote the intelligent technology service mode and improve the service quality in the sci-tech field.
On the basis of the theoretical system of sci-tech decentralization, regulation and service, this study further identifies the connotation of sci-tech decentralization, regulation and service, comprehensively and systematically analyzes the reform effect, and enriches the research literature in the field of sci-tech innovation. Meanwhile, from the perspective of development, it examines the evolution rules and overall differences of the reform effect of China′s sci-tech decentralization, and provides theoretical reference and practical reference for various regions to streamline administration and delegate power, combine decentralization with regulation, optimize services, and promote the reform coordinately and comprehensively.
|
|
Received: 15 August 2022
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 张超,宋晓华,孙亚男.黄河流域科技创新效率差异测度、来源分解与形成机理[J].经济与管理评论,2021,37(6):38-50.
[2] 杨骞,刘鑫鹏,孙淑惠.中国科技创新效率的时空格局及收敛性检验[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2021,38(12):105-123.
[3] 王雅丽,黄永春.长江经济带科技创新效率测度及影响因素分析[J].统计与决策,2021,37(15):104-108.
[4] 李芸,雷宏振,张小筠.基于SBM模型的科技创新效率及影响因素研究[J].技术经济,2020,39(5):1-8.
[5] 赖一飞,谢潘佳,叶丽婷,等.我国区域科技创新效率测评及影响因素研究——基于超效率SBM-Malmquist-Tobit模型[J].科技进步与对策,2021,38(13):37-45.
[6] 朱林,朱学义.科技创新绩效影响因素研究——来自全国工业企业2004—2018年数据[J].会计之友,2021(3):103-109.
[7] 刘佐菁,陈杰.科技资源配置水平评价及区域差异研究[J].科技管理研究,2019,39(11):93-100.
[8] 国务院.科技“放管服”有利于释放创新活力[EB/OL].http://opinion.people.com.cn/n1/2018/0726/c1003-301722 21.html.2021-12-11.
[9] 段异兵.中国科技改革开放40年的回顾与展望[J].人民论坛·学术前沿,2020,9(2):58-64.
[10] 王文倩.论产业政策对企业技术创新的影响——政策工具的机制检验、政府行为差异下的异质性特征[J].江汉学术,2022,40(3):82-91.
[11] 汪芳,曹玮宇.金融发展与技术创新水平——兼论经济政策不确定性的调节作用[J].北京邮电大学学报(社会科学版),2022,24(1):47-58.
[12] 李响,李贤慧,李爽.地方政府廉政水平对企业技术创新积极性的影响研究[J].当代经济,2022,29(2):92-102.
[13] 夏祥谦.各省区市金融发展水平的比较研究[J].金融理论与实践,2014,33(1):63-68.
[14] ROSENBLATT M.Remarks on some nonparumetric estimates of a density function[J].Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1956, 27(3):832-837.
[15] PARZEN E.On estimation of probability density function and mode[J].Annals of Mat Hematical Statistics,1962, 33(3): 1065-1076.
[16] DAGUM C.A new approach to the decomposition of the Gini income inequality Ratio[J].Empirical Economics,1997,22(4): 515-531.
[17] BARRO ROBERT J.Economic growth in a cross section of countries[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics,1991, 106(2):407-443.
[18] LI ZEHUI,JIAO LIMIN,ZHANG BOEN,et al. Understanding the pattern and mechanism of spatial concentration of urban land use, population and economic activities: a case study in Wuhan, China[J].Geo-spatial Information Science,2021, 24(4):678-694.
[19] OVCHINNIKOVA A V,TOPOLEVA T N.Clusterization of the economic space as a factor in the growth of the national economy competitiveness[J].Management Science,2020, 10(2):41-52.
[20] MASAHISA FUJITA,PING WANG. Tribute to Marcus Berliant: a pivotal matchmaker of general equilibrium and spatial economics[J].International Journal of Economic Theory,2020, 16(1):6-26.
[21] 王佳莹,张辉.旅游发展、空间溢出与区域经济不平衡[J].旅游科学,2021,35(2):73-94.
[22] 冯严超,王晓红,胡士磊.FDI、OFDI与中国绿色全要素生产率——基于空间计量模型的分析[J].中国管理科学,2021,29(12):81-91.
|
|
|
|
