|
|
|
| The Standard Contradictions for Establishment of Local Science and Technology Awards and Countermeasures |
| Cao Haijing,Wang Yan |
| (Law School,Huazhong University of Science and Technology ,Wuhan 430073,China) |
|
|
|
|
Abstract The local science and technology award is the focus of the construction of local science and technology award system in China, and it is of great significance to promote and protect local scientific and technological innovation. The Plan on Deepening the Reform of Science and Technology Award System issued in 2017 stipulates that local people's governments below the provincial level shall not set up science and technology awards funded by finance, while the Regulation on National Science and Technology Awards (2020 Revision) emphasizes that the above-mentioned local administrative organs shall not set up science and technology awards in the form of prohibitive norms, resulting in standard inconsistencies between the reform decision on science and technology reward system by the Central Committee and the legislation of science and technology reward of the State Council. This problem gives birth to the standard contradictions of establishing local science and technology awards by local administrative organs below the provincial level, i.e., it is unsure whether the reform decision on the science and technology reward system by the Central Committee shall prevail or the legislation of the State Council shall prevail. Therefore this paper aims to analyze and deal with this problem.#br#At present, domestic researches mainly focus on the improvement of the science and technology award system of specific provinces, and lack discussion on the standard contradictions of the establishment of local science and technology awards below the provincial level. Although foreign researches reveal the rationality of the grading of science and technology awards, they seldom analyze the hierarchical structure of the local science and technology award system. Therefore, the research on the standard contradictions of the establishment of local science and technology awards is of special regional characteristics. In this paper, the concept of local science and technology award is strictly defined. By comprehensively using the research methods of normative interpretation, value analysis, historical comparison and logical demonstration, this paper takes the norms of central and local science and technology award system as the research text, sorts out the historical development vein of the contradictions of local science and technology award establishment in combination with the actual situation of the governance on local science and technology award, analyzes the institutional logic of the contradictions, and deeply analyzes the possible ways to deal with the contradictions.#br#The results show that, in the priority order generated by the establishment of local science and technology awards, the CPC Central Committee, the State Council, local people's governments, scientific and technological staff and other different field subjects interact and influence one other with the constraints of their respective institutional logics, resulting in the wrestling of multiple institutional logics such as national logic, performance logic and industry logic, which leads to the standardization contradictions of the establishment of local science and technology awards. One feasible countermeasure is to clarify the priority of the reform decision on science and technology reward system by the Central Committee, based on which to integrate fragmentation of the established norms of local science and technology awards; then it is suggested to solve the inconsistency between the central science and technology award system reform decision and the State Council science and technology award legislation through the administrative interpretation or filing review mechanism, so as to realize the effective connection between the reform decision and the legislative decision; thirdly the coordination and unification of the establishment of local science and technology awards can be realized through the legislative clearing mechanism to solve the contradictions such as the non-uniform standard basis for the establishment of local science and technology awards in the provincial science and technology award local government regulations, and the conflicts with the upper law and the legislative omission.#br#This paper systematically explains and responds to the standard contradictions of the establishment of local science and technology awards below the provincial level. The research results have a positive guiding significance for eliminating the uncertain factors in the construction of the local science and technology award system and giving full play to the structural function of local science and technology awards.#br#
|
|
Received: 15 October 2022
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 马克斯·韦伯.学术与政治[M].阎克文,译.上海：上海人民出版社，2021:61-101.
[2] ROBERT K MERTON.Priorities in scientific discovery:a chapter in the sociology of science[J].American Sociological Review, 1957,22(6):645-659.
[3] R.K.默顿.科学社会学（下册）[M].鲁旭东，林聚任，译.北京：商务印书馆,2017:423.
[4] BERNARD BARBER.Social stratification：a comparative analysis of structure and process[M]. New York: Harcourt,Brace，1957:2.
[5] STEPHEN COLE,JONATHAN R COLE.Scientific output and recognition:a study in the operation of the reward system in science[J].American Sociological Review, 1967, 32(3):377-390.
[6] 王炎坤,钟书华，等.科技奖励论[M].武汉:华中理工大学出版社，2000:119.
[7] 钟书华,王炎坤，等.国家科技计划与科技奖励[M].北京:人民出版社，2007:148.
[8] 李强.科技界的激励与竞争机制研究[M].武汉:华中科技大学出版社,2014:148.
[9] 卡尔·拉伦茨.法学方法论[M].黄家镇,译.北京：法律出版社，2020:490.
[10] 周雪光,艾云.多重逻辑下的制度变迁：一个分析框架[J].中国社会科学,2010，31（4）：132-150，223.
[11] 沃尔特·W·鲍威尔，保罗·J·迪马吉奥.组织分析的新制度主义[M].姚伟,译.上海:上海人民出版社，2008：271.
[12] 陈海嵩.我国环境监管转型的制度逻辑——以环境法实施为中心的考察[J].法商研究，2019,36(5):3-13.
[13] 姚昆仑.中外科技奖励概论[M].北京：科学技术文献出版社，2022:251.
[14] 周黎安.行政发包制[J].社会,2014,34(6):1-38.
[15] 周黎安.中国地方官员的晋升锦标赛模式研究[J].经济研究,2007，53(7):36-50.
[16] 石献记,朱德全.职业教育服务乡村振兴的多重制度逻辑[J].国家教育行政学院学报，2022，24(4):43-51，95.
[17] 张节,李千惠.智慧城市建设对城市科技创新能力的影响[J].科技进步与对策,2020,37(22):38-44.
[18] 杰里·加斯顿.科学的社会运行[M].顾昕，译.北京：光明日报出版社，1988：190,200.
[19] 全国人大常委会法制工作委员会法规备案审查室.规范性文件备案审查理论与实务[M].北京:中国民主法制出版社，2020:108.
|
|
|
|
