|
|
|
| Sustainable Development Pathwaysto Improve Economy and Innovation Performance in Industrial Parks: A Fuzzy Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis |
| Ren Hao1,Ouyang Juan1,Tang Kaiyi1,Zhen Jie2,Ye Jiangfeng3 |
| (1.School of Economics and Management, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China;2. Business School, East China University of Political Science and Law, Shanghai 201620, China;3. School of Business, Anhui University, Hefei 230601, China) |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Industrial parks have been the key platform to promote industrial agglomeration, resource integration, technology transfer and sustainable innovation around the world. The main carriers are consisted by economic development zones and high-tech zones with the aim to realize sustainable development. Under the new development pattern, it has become an urgent problem of how to effectively improve the economy and innovation performance to promote sustainable development in industrial parks. The perspective of sustainable development integrates economic, society and environmental factors into the same analysis framework, and emphasizes the factor coordination and interaction.#br#From the perspective of sustainable development, this study constructs the analysis framework of industrial parks’ sustainable development system from five aspects, including economic foundation, innovation carrier, industrial cooperation, public service and social environment. Meanwhile, it adopts the fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis(fsQCA) method to carry out research in the hope of revealing the complex causal mechanism of sustainable development system on economic and innovation performance in the industrial parks. Thus, this study takes 100 national industrial parks in China as samples, including 49 economic development zones and 51 high-tech zones, and applies the fsQCA approach to explore the sustainable development pathways that can generate high economic performance and high innovation performance inthe industrial parks.#br#It is found that the necessary conditions of high economic and high innovation performance involve more than just a single sustainable development element ; however, good economic foundation plays a general role in generating high economic performance, both good economic foundation and abundant innovation carrier play general roles in generating high innovation performance.There are three sustainable development pathways that can generate high economic performance, and two sustainable development pathways that can generate high innovation performance. These findings denote the multiple realization ways of improving economic and innovation performance in the industrial parks. Meanwhile, there are four pathways generating non-high economic performance, and five pathways generating non-high innovation performance, and there is an asymmetrical relationship with the corresponding pathways of high performance.Under certain conditions, there is a substitutive relationship between the high industrial cooperation and the high social environment in achieving high economic performance. There is a complementary relationship between the high economic foundation and the high innovation carrier in achieving high innovation performance.High innovation performance pathway must be high economic performance pathway, but not vice verse necessarily. The pathway with high economic foundation, high innovation carrier and high industrial cooperation is the key path to generate both high economic performance and high innovation performance.The proportions of economic development zones and high-tech zones among industrial parks with high economic performance and high innovation performance are balanced, and the development pathway of these two zones for improving economic and innovation performance is similar.#br#This study constructs the antecedent condition system that affects the economic and innovation performance of industrial parks from the perspective of sustainable development, and reveals the similarities and differences between these two kinds of pathways and their internal connections. By incorporating both economic development zone and high-tech zone into the research category, it realizes the comparative analysis of these two types of parks from the aspect of sustainable development pathways.For future research, on the one hand, it will be helpful to further optimize the research results by integrating government support and digitalization into the analysis framework. On the other hand, it's also encouraged to use a multi-period and multi-linear growth QCA method to analyze the development pathways of industrial parks in different stages, and explain the reasons for the evolution.#br#
|
|
Received: 10 January 2022
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] UNIDO (HPED/IPPS). Industrial estates: principles and practice[R]. Vienna: United Nations Industrial Development Organization, 1997.
[2] BARRERA G A F, DURANY X G I, PONS J R, et al. Trends in global research on industrial parks: a bibliometric analysis from 1996-2019[J].Heliyon, 2021, 7(8):1-14.
[3] 任浩, 甄杰. 园区管理通论[M].上海:上海人民出版社, 2021.
[4] 任浩, 甄杰, 叶江峰, 等. 2018中国产业园区持续发展蓝皮书[M].上海:同济大学出版社, 2018.
[5] 甄杰, 任浩, 唐开翼. 中国产业园区持续发展：历程、形态与逻辑[J].城市规划学刊, 2022,66(1):66-73.
[6] 中华人民共和国商务部. 结构优化质效提升国家经开区发展势头良好 [EB/OL].(2021-02-01)[2021-09-07].http:// www.mofcom.gov.cn/article/i/jyjl/j/202102/202102030 35970.shtml.
[7] 中华人民共和国国务院新闻办公室. 促进国家高新技术产业开发区高质量发展国务院政策例行吹风会 [EB/OL].(2020-07-23)[2021-09-07] .http://www.scio.gov.cn/32344/32345/42294/43330/tw43332/Document/1684265/1684265.htm.
[8] 王育宝, 胡芳肖. 科技园区持续发展的机制探讨[J].中国科技论坛, 2016,32(5):91-96.
[9] QU Y, LIU Y, NAYAK R R, et al. Sustainable development of eco-industrial parks in China: effects of managers' environmental awareness on the relationships between practice and performance[J].Journal of Cleaner Production, 2015, 87:328-338.
[10] 叶江峰, 任浩, 甄杰. 中国国家级产业园区30年发展政策的主题与演变[J].科学学研究, 2015, 33(11):1634-1640,1714.
[11] GUADIX J, CARRILLO-CASTRILLO J, ONIEVA L, et al. Success variables in science and technology parks[J].Journal of Business Research, 2016, 69(11):4870-4875.
[12] LECLUYSE L, KNOCKAERT M, SPITHOVEN A. The contribution of science parks: a literature review and future research agenda[J].Journal of Technology Transfer, 2019, 44(2):559-595.
[13] 徐维祥, 方亮. 产业集聚、国家高新区创新与区域经济增长关系研究[J].浙江工业大学学报(社会科学版), 2015, 14(3):249-253,334.
[14] 余义勇, 张骁. “产-人-环”一体化常熟经济技术开发区转型升级路径与发展模式研究[J].科技进步与对策, 2019, 36(22):43-50.
[15] 孔翔, 顾子恒. 国家级经济技术开发区发展绩效区位因素研究[J].科技进步与对策, 2017, 34(8):45-51.
[16] 孙红军, 张路娜, 王胜光. 国家高新区创新国际化水平及影响因素研究[J].科技进步与对策, 2020, 37(4):42-51.
[17] 史普润, 李昆, 贾军. 国家高新区创新平台效应的实证研究[J].科研管理, 2019, 40(12):21-30.
[18] 张建清, 白洁, 王磊. 产城融合对国家高新区创新绩效的影响——来自长江经济带的实证研究[J].宏观经济研究, 2017,39(5):108-117.
[19] RAGIN C C. Redesigning social inquiry: fuzzy sets and beyond[M].Chicago:University of Chicago Press, 2008.
[20] 路正南, 王正明, 张爱龙. 经济技术开发区可持续发展测评指标体系研究[J].科技进步与对策, 2007,24(3):116-119.
[21] 谢守红, 计林平, 丁卉. 长江三角洲高新区可持续发展研究[J].世界地理研究, 2012, 21(3):111-118.
[22] 李楠, 龚惠玲, 张超. 区域创新驱动发展关键影响因素研究[J].科技进步与对策, 2016, 33(12):41-46.
[23] 刘钒, 邓明亮. 国家高新区对外贸易、高新技术企业占比影响创新效率的实证研究[J].科技进步与对策, 2019, 36(24):37-44.
[24] 徐吉祥, 孙遇春. 开发区创新绩效影响因素实证研究[J].科技进步与对策, 2011, 28(19):43-47.
[25] 曹旭平, 张国平. 开发区创新驱动发展的核心载体建设——基于江苏花桥经济开发区的调研[J].科技管理研究, 2017, 37(17):115-123.
[26] DIEZ-VIAL I, FERNANDEZ-OLMOS M. The effect of science and technology parks on firms' performance: how can firms benefit most under economic downturns[J].Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 2017, 29(10):1153-1166.
[27] RATINHO T, HENRIQUES E. The role of science parks and business incubators in converging countries:evidence from Portugal[J].Technovation, 2010, 30(4):278-290.
[28] 柳卸林, 杨博旭. 多元化还是专业化? 产业集聚对区域创新绩效的影响机制研究[J].中国软科学, 2020,35(9):141-161.
[29] VASQUEZ-URRIAGO R, BARGE-GIL A, RICO A M. Science and Technology Parks and cooperation for innovation: Empirical evidence from Spain[J].Research Policy, 2016, 45(1):137-147.
[30] 任浩, 甄杰, 叶江峰, 等. 园区不惑：中国产业园区改革开放40年进程[M].上海:上海人民出版社, 2018.
[31] 杜运周, 李佳馨, 刘秋辰, 等. 复杂动态视角下的组态理论与QCA方法：研究进展与未来方向[J].管理世界, 2021, 37(3):180-197.
[32] 唐开翼, 欧阳娟, 甄杰, 等. 区域创新生态系统如何驱动创新绩效——基于31个省市的模糊集定性比较分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理, 2021, 42(7):53-72.
[33] 张明, 陈伟宏, 蓝海林. 中国企业“凭什么”完全并购境外高新技术企业——基于94个案例的模糊集定性比较分析(fsQCA)[J].中国工业经济, 2019,37(4):117-135.
[34] BUESA M, HEIJS J, PELLITERO M M, et al. Regional systems of innovation and the knowledge production function: the Spanish case[J].Technovation, 2006, 26(4):463-472.
[35] FISS P C. Building better causal theories: a fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research[J].Academy of Management Journal, 2011, 54(2):393-420.
[36] SCHNEIDER C Q, WAGEMANN C. Set-theoretic methods for the social sciences: a guide to qualitative comparative analysis[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 2012.
|
|
|
|
