|
|
|
| High Quality Development Evaluation of Regional Intellectual Property Rights Based on Public Value |
| Hu Wenjing1,2,Ma Jianxia1,2,Xiezhen1,2 |
| （1.Lanzhou Information Center, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, CAS, Lanzhou 730000,China；2. School of Economics and Management University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 101408,China） |
|
|
|
|
Abstract In the context of increasingly fierce international competition, the national core competitiveness is manifested in the cultivation, allocation and regulation ability of knowledge innovation achievements and intellectual property resources. Since the promulgation of the outline of the national intellectual property strategy in 2008, the intellectual property strategy, as a basic strategy to encourage and protect innovation and promote economic and social development, has played a more and more important role. High quality development evaluation of intellectual property is not only an important way to test the implementation effect of intellectual property strategy, but also the key evidence of intellectual property strategy adjustment and reform.#br#According to Benington's division of public value dimension, this paper holds that the public value of high-quality development of intellectual property can be reflected in four first-class dimensions: economic value, social value, ecological value and government capacity value. The setting of secondary dimension follows the theory of sustainable development. The second dimension of economic value is set as the transformation of economic growth mode and the optimization of economic structure. The evaluation process is divided into five steps. Firstly, Lasso regression is used to preliminarily select the existing indicators in the China intellectual property development evaluation report, and the indicators with multiple co-occurrence are removed from the perspective of statistics. Secondly, according to the summary of existing research and the requirements of national innovation and sustainable development strategy, the indicators are revised and new indicators are introduced; Thirdly, auto encoder technology is used to characterize the public value of high-quality development of intellectual property rights. Fourthly, the random forest model is used to fit the three-level indicators and the public value of high-quality development of intellectual property rights, select the indicators again and determine the index weight. Fifthly, the coordination degree of the first-order index is calculated by using the dispersion coefficient coordination degree model, and the weighted geometric average is used for exponential synthesis.#br#Third-one provinces, municipalities and autonomous regions (hereinafter referred to as provinces) in mainland China are selected to compare the high-quality development of regional intellectual property rights. With consideration og the lag of statistical data of some indicators, 2019 data are used for analysis. Through the above steps, a reference index system for high-quality development of intellectual property rights including 4 primary indicators, 10 secondary indicators and 37 tertiary indicators has been constructed, including 18 indicators in the report, 6 modified indicators, 8 indicators in relevant literature and 5 new indicators. According to the score of intellectual property high-quality development index, the intellectual property development status of 31 regions in China can be divided into five echelons: the first echelon is Guangdong Province, which is the only region with intellectual property high-quality development index above 0.7; the second echelon includes Shanghai, Beijing, Zhejiang and Jiangsu, with a score range of 0.5 ~ 0.7; the third echelon includes 10 regions of Shandong, Sichuan, Tianjin, Hunan, Fujian, Anhui, Hubei, Henan, Hebei and Liaoning, with a score range of 0.4 ~ 0.5; the fourth echelon includes 10 regions of Shaanxi, Jilin, Chongqing, Jiangxi, Gansu, Heilongjiang, Guangxi, Yunnan, Guizhou and Shanxi, with a score range of 0.3 ~ 0.4; and the fifth echelon includes Ningxia, Hainan, Inner Mongolia, Qinghai, Xinjiang and Tibet, with a score of less than 0.3.#br#Through the position of each region in the coordinate system of high-quality development of intellectual property, it can be seen that the first and second echelons with high scores of high-quality development index of intellectual property are located in the first quadrant close to the x-axis and y-axis respectively, and far away from the angular bisector of the first and third quadrants of the coordinate system. Therefore it’s necessary to adjust the development mode of regional intellectual property rights accordingly.#br#The three-level indicators’ weight value distribution of the high-quality development index system of intellectual property rights has significant long tail distribution characteristics.The three indicators of R & D funds, high-value patents and intellectual property services are directional to improve the quality of intellectual property development. In the case of limited R&D funds, the cultivation of high-value patents and the improvement of intellectual property service level play a vital role in the high-quality development of intellectual property. It should be pointed out that it would lead to a state of imbalance of intellectual property development if only head indicators are stressed.#br#
|
|
Received: 07 December 2021
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1]王克. 牢记绿色发展使命推动经济高质量发展[EB/OL].（2019-09-20）[2021-11-29]. http://www.rmlt.com.cn/2019/0920/557345.shtml.[2]庞金友. 把握高质量发展的深刻内涵[EB/OL].（2021-01-28）[2021-11-29]. https://m.gmw.cn/baijia/2021-01/28/34580473.html.[3]经济产省.知的财产战略指标の策定に向けた中间整理[EB/OL].（2008-02-21）[2021-11-29]. http://www.meti.go.jp/policy/economicindustrial/press/0005290/2/040607tetsuzuki2.pdf.[4]乔永忠，万小丽. 我国国家资助科研项目发明创造归属政策绩效分析[J]. 科技进步与对策，2009，26(7):91-94.[5]MOWERY D C，NELSON R R，SAMPAT B N，et al. The growth of patenting and licensing by US universities: an assessment of the effects of the Bayh-Dole act of 1980[J].Research Policy，2001，30(1):99-119.[6]孙兵兵，刘云，宋赛赛. 北京市专利申请资助政策演变特征与效果分析[J]. 现代情报，2013，33(8):35-39.[7]任庆华，蔡跃洲. 知识产权会商制度实施的政策效果评价——基于当量准值法和双重差分法的实证分析[J]. 中南财经政法大学学报，2016,59(1):38-44.[8]包国宪，周云飞.政府绩效评价的价值载体模型构建研究[J].公共管理学报，2013，10（2）：101-109，142.[9]唐恒, 朱宇. 区域知识产权战略的实施与评价——江苏之实践与探索[M]. 北京：知识产权出版社, 2011:163-165,246-248.[10]高晴. 我国知识产权战略实施的绩效评估指标设计[J]. 河北大学学报(哲学社会科学版)，2011,32(4):156-157.[11]郭俊华，曹洲涛.知识产权政策评估体系的建立与推进策略研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理，2010，31(3)，31-38.[12]康捷，袁永，胡海鹏.基于全过程的科技创新政策评价框架体系研究[J].科技管理研究，2019，39(2)，25-30.[13]袁源. 知识产权政策多维效果研究[D]. 合肥：中国科学技术大学, 2012.[14]GOLDFARB B，HENREKSON M. Bottom-up versus top-down policies towards the commercialization of university intellectual property[J].Research Policy,2003,32(4):639-658.[15]金永红,慈向阳.日本大学知识产权战略及其对我国大学的启示[J].研究与发展管理,2007，19(5):82-86.[16]常旭华，刘永千，刘笑，等.区域科技成果转化政策目标体系与评估——基于上海数据的研究[J].中国科技论坛，2018，34(9):58-68.[17]曾旻辉. 促进广东省专利服务创新发展的公共政策研究[D]. 武汉：华中科技大学，2017.[18]MASKUS K E. Intellectual property rights and economic development[J]. Case W. Res. J. Int'l L., 2000, 32: 471.[19]GINARTE J C ,PARK W G . Determinants of patent rights: A cross-national study[J]. Research Policy, 1997, 26(3): 283-301.[20]孟奇勋，黎运智.我国知识产权战略实施软环境评价指标研究[J].电子知识产权，2008,18（6）：25-28.[21]詹映,佘力焓. 国家知识产权战略实施之法治环境完善绩效评价研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2011, 28(2): 123-127.[22]BIELINSKA-DUSZA E , HAMERSKA M . Methodology for calculating the european innovation scoreboard—proposition for modification[J]. Sustainability, 2021, 13(4):2199.[23]WIPO. World Intellectual Property Indicators 2020[EB/OL].（2021-11-16）[2021-11-29]. https://www.wipo.int/publications/zh/series/index.jsp?id=37.[24]SCHMID J. An open-source method for assessing national scientific and technological standing[EB/OL].[2021-10-28].https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA1482-3.html .[25]黄庆,曹津燕,瞿卫军,等.专利评价指标体系(一)——专利评价指标体系的设计和构建[J].知识产权,2004，18(5):25-28.[26]聂兰兰. 以专利技术发展路线为视角的高价值专利评价[J]. 中国发明与专利, 2020, 17(S1): 31-36.[27]唐杰, 周勇涛. 企业知识产权战略实施绩效评价研究[J]. 情报杂志, 2009, 28(7):55-60.[28]王正志. 中国知识产权指数报告:全面分析知识产权各类指标、数据,揭示知识产权发展状况与经济增长模式及竞争力水平的[M].北京：中国财政经济出版社, 2015.[29]刘凤朝, 林原. 知识产权与区域高质量发展耦合协调研究——以我国省级行政区为样本的实证分析[J]. 华中师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 55(5):717-726.[30]金碚. 关于“高质量发展”的经济学研究[J]. 中国工业经济, 2018, 361(4): 5-18.[31]袁祖社. 公共价值的信念与美好生活的理想——马克思哲学变革的理论深蕴[J]. 中国社会科学, 2019(12): 28-45, 199-200.[32]BENINGTON J. Creating the public in order to create public value[J]. Intl Journal of Public Administration, 2009, 32(3-4):232-249.[33]奚洁人. 科学发展观百科辞典[M]. 上海：上海辞书出版社, 2007.[34]洪功翔.政治经济学[M].合肥：中国科学技术大学出版社，2012.[35]BARBIER E B.Natural resources and economic development[M]. Cambridge Books, 2019.[36]联合国可持续发展大会. 中华人民共和国可持续发展国家报告[M]. 北京：人民出版社, 2012.[37]UNEP,IUCN, WWF . Caring for the earth a strategy for sustainable living[M]. Routledge, 2009.[38]王学军, 张弘. 公共价值的研究路径与前沿问题[J]. 公共管理学报, 2013, 10(2):126-136.[39]冉棋文. 可持续发展之制度分析[D]. 成都：西南财经大学，2000.[40]蒋玉宏. 知识产权制度对城市竞争力的影响[D]. 上海：同济大学, 2008.[41]韩保江, 邹一南. 中国经济高质量发展报告(2021)[M]. 上海：社会科学文献出版社，2021.[42]TIBSHIRANI R J . Regression shrinkage and selection via the LASSO[J]. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B: Methodological, 1996, 73(1):273-282.[43]RUMELHART D E，HINTON G E，WILLIAMS R J. Learning representations by back-propagating errors[J]. Nature，1986, 323(6088): 533-536.[44]GOODFELLOW I, BENGIO Y, COURVILLE A. Deep learning[M]. Cambridge：MIT Press, 2016: 499-507.[45]BREIMAN L. Random forests[J]. Machine Learning, 2001, 45(1): 5-32.[46]张文德, 程涵, 刘田,等. 随机森林在高校信息碎片化整合中的应用[J]. 图书情报工作, 2018, 62(7):119-124.[47]张建顺, 匡浩宇.“放管服”改革与纳税人满意度:施策重点与优化路径——基于机器学习方法[J]. 公共管理学报, 2021, 18(4):46-62,169.[48]人民网.习近平总书记谈协调[EB/OL].（2016-03-03）[2021-11-29]. http://cpc.people.com.cn/xuexi/n1/2016/0303/c385474-28168742.html.[49]范柏乃, 张维维, 贺建军. 我国经济社会协调发展的内涵及其测度研究[J]. 统计研究, 2013, 30(7):3-8.[50]刘呈军, 聂富强, 任栋.高质量发展背景下我国人类发展指数协调性测度[J]. 统计与决策, 2021, 37(5):60-64.[51]张超,施洁. 知识产权质押融资模式的演化博弈研究[J]. 技术经济与管理研究, 2021(11): 57-61. |
|
|
|
