|
|
|
| The Influence of Digital Inclusive Finance on the Innovation Resilience of High-tech Manufacturing Industry: A Test Based on System GMM and Threshold Effects |
| Fan Jianhong1,Wang Bing1,Yan Le1,Qu Jiaojiao2 |
| (1.College of Economics and Management, Taiyuan University of Technology,Taiyuan 030024, China;2.School of Business Administration, Huaqiao University, Quanzhou 362021, China) |
|
|
|
|
Abstract In the face of VUCA (Volatility, Uncertainty, Complexity, Ambiguity) environment, innovation resilience has become an important factor to ensure the development of high-tech manufacturing industry. However, the innovation activities of high-tech manufacturing industry are characterized by high investment, high risk and long cycle. The improvement of its innovation resilience requires the support of financial services. As a useful complement of traditional finance, digital inclusive finance provides a solution to this problem. At present, the influence of digital inclusive finance on the innovation resilience of high-tech manufacturing industry is barely tapped. In view of this, based on provincial panel data from 2011 to 2019, the study adopts system GMM and threshold effect model to examine the influence of digital inclusive finance on the innovation resilience of high-tech manufacturing industry, the threshold effects of consumption upgrading and R&D investment intensity.#br#The results show that digital inclusive finance and its coverage breadth,use depth and digitization level have significant positive influences on the innovation resilience of high-tech manufacturing industry. Consumption upgrading and R&D investment intensity show a single threshold effect and a double threshold effect respectively in the influence of digital inclusive finance on the innovation resilience of high-tech manufacturing industry. Further regional heterogeneity research reveals that digital inclusive finance only improves the innovation resilience of high-tech manufacturing industry in the central & western regions. Consumption upgrading shows a double threshold effect and a single threshold effect in the eastern region and central & western regions respectively. R&D investment intensity shows a single threshold effect in both the eastern region and central & western regions.#br#According to the conclusions, the paper provides the following suggestions. Firstly, relevant departments should utilize digital technology to empower inclusive finance, thereby to enhance the innovation resilience of high-tech manufacturing industry. Relevant departments should utilize digital technology to integrate financial resources and improve the digital inclusive finance and its coverage breadth, use depth an digitalization level. At the same time they should reduce the information asymmetry between financial institutions and high-tech manufacturing industry and promote the integrated development of digital inclusive finance and high-tech manufacturing industry. Secondly, relevant departments should seize the opportunities of consumption upgrading to enhance the influence of digital inclusive finance on the innovation resilience of high-tech manufacturing industry. On the one hand, relevant departments should utilize digital technology to exploit the financial needs, and provide personalized financial products and services. On the other hand, they should establish an interconnection mechanism to timely transmit information about consumption upgrading to high-tech manufacturing industry, and encourage it to utilize digital inclusive financial resources to exploit high-quality innovative products that meet consumer needs, thereby to enhance innovation resilience. Thirdly, relevant departments should adjust R&D investment appropriately to improve the innovation resilience of high-tech manufacturing industry through digital inclusive finance. For provinces whose R&D investment intensitiy has not crossed the first threshold, relevant departments should encourage high-tech manufacturing enterprises to establish technology research centers and innovation incubation centers and so on, and carry out R&D activities and increase R&D investment; while for provinces whose R&D investment intensitiy has crossed the second threshold, relevant departments should guide them to regulate the R&D investment of high-tech manufacturing industry within a reasonable range. In addition, relevant departments of each province should formulate policies according to the local conditions of digital inclusive finance, consumption upgrading and the R&D investment intensity of high-tech manufacturing industry, and improve the innovation resilience of the high-tech manufacturing industry in the eastern and central & western regions.#br#The marginal contributions of the paper include three aspects. Firstly, this study starts from innovation resilience, turns the perspective to a specific industry, and explores the influence of digital inclusive finance on the innovation resilience of high-tech manufacturing industry. It expands the research of the influence of digital inclusive finance on innovation. Secondly, the study incorporates the consumption upgrading and R&D investment intensity into the research framework, and reveals the threshold effects of the consumption upgrading and R&D investment intensity in the influence of digital inclusive finance on the innovation resilience of high-tech manufacturing industry. Thirdly, the sample is divided into the eastern and central & western regions to clarify the regional heterogeneity of the influence of digital inclusive finance on the innovation resilience of high-tech manufacturing industry.#br#
|
|
Received: 10 May 2022
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] 徐子尧, 张莉沙, 刘益志. 数字普惠金融提升了区域创新能力吗[J]. 财经科学, 2020,64(11): 17-28.[2] 任碧云, 刘佳鑫. 数字普惠金融发展与区域创新水平提升——基于内部供给与外部需求视角的分析[J]. 西南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2021, 42(2): 99-111.[3] 李健, 江金鸥, 陈传明. 包容性视角下数字普惠金融与企业创新的关系: 基于中国A股上市企业的证据[J]. 管理科学, 2020, 33(6): 16-29.[4] 赵晓鸽, 钟世虎, 郭晓欣. 数字普惠金融发展、金融错配缓解与企业创新[J]. 科研管理, 2021, 42(4): 158-169.[5] OZILI P K.Impact of digital finance on financial inclusion and stability[J].Borsa Istanbul Review,2018,18(4):329-340.[6] FENG S,ZHANG R, LI G.Environmental decentralization, digital finance and green technology innovation[J]. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 2022, 61: 70-83.[7] RAMEZANI J,CAMARINHA-MATOS L.Approaches for resilience and antifragility in collaborative business ecosystems[J].Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2020,151:119846.[8] 赵伟, 吴松强, 吴琨. 韧性视角下科技型中小企业创新风险防范研究[J]. 现代管理科学, 2022,41(1): 115-124.[9] 孙久文, 孙翔宇. 区域经济韧性研究进展和在中国应用的探索[J]. 经济地理, 2017, 37(10): 1-9.[10] HALLAK R, ASSAKER G, O’CONNOR P, et al. Firm performance in the upscale restaurant sector: the effects of resilience, creative self-efficacy, innovation and industry experience[J]. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 2018, 40(1): 229-240.[11] 胡甲滨, 俞立平. 创新韧性对高技术产业创新的影响机制与特征研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2022, 39(2): 49-59.[12] KOU M, YANG Y, CHEN K. The impact of external R&D financing on innovation process from a supply-demand perspective[J]. Economic Modelling, 2020, 92(2): 375-387.[13] LEYSHON A, THRIFT N. Access to financial services and financial infrastructure withdrawal: problems policies[J]. Area, 1994, 26(3): 268-275.[14] 褚翠翠, 佟孟华, 李洋, 等. 中国数字普惠金融与省域经济增长——基于空间计量模型的实证研究[J]. 经济问题探索, 2021,42(6): 179-190.[15] CORRADO G, CORRADO L. Inclusive finance for inclusive growth and development[J]. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2017, 24: 19-23.[16] TANG X,DING S, GAO X,et al. Can digital finance help increase the value of strategic emerging enterprises[J]. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2022, 81: 103829.[17] 张珍花, 杨朝晖. 数字普惠金融对经济高质量增长影响研究——基于政府参与视角[J]. 华东经济管理, 2022, 36(4): 71-78.[18] 孙倩, 徐璋勇. 数字普惠金融、县域禀赋与产业结构升级[J]. 统计与决策, 2021, 37(18): 140-144.[19] 雷辉, 金敏. 银行数字普惠金融、银行竞争与企业融资约束[J]. 财经理论与实践, 2021, 42(6): 2-9.[20] LI J, WU Y, XIAO J J. The impact of digital finance on household consumption: evidence from China[J]. Economic Modelling, 2020, 86: 317-326.[21] 梁榜, 张建华. 数字普惠金融发展能激励创新吗——来自中国城市和中小企业的证据[J]. 当代经济科学, 2019, 41(5): 74-86.[22] 吴庆田, 朱映晓. 数字普惠金融对企业技术创新的影响研究——阶段性机制识别与异质性分析[J]. 工业技术经济, 2021, 40(3): 143-151.[23] 蒋震. 工业化水平、地方政府努力与土地财政: 对中国土地财政的一个分析视角[J]. 中国工业经济, 2014,31(10): 33-45.[24] 王惠, 卞艺杰, 王树乔. 出口贸易、工业碳排放效率动态演进与空间溢出[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2016, 33(1): 3-19.[25] MARTIN R, GARDINER B. The resilience of cities to economic shocks: a tale of four recessions (and the challenge of brexit)[J]. Papers in Regional Science, 2019, 98(4): 1801-1832.[26] 郭峰, 王靖一, 王芳, 等. 测度中国数字普惠金融发展: 指数编制与空间特征[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2020, 19(4): 1401-1418.[27] 黄赜琳, 秦淑悦. 市场一体化对消费升级的影响——基于“量”与“质”的双重考察[J]. 中国人口科学, 2021，35(5): 18-31, 126.[28] 尹亚红, 刘佳舟. 海外并购、金融发展与高技术制造业技术创新关系研究[J]. 江西社会科学, 2020, 40(7):52-63.[29] 王仁祥, 杨曼. 制度环境、基础设施与“科技—金融”系统效率改善[J]. 科学学研究, 2017, 35(9):1313-1319.[30] 化祥雨, 金祥荣, 吕海萍, 等. 高质量发展耦合协调时空格局演化及影响因素——以浙江省县域为例[J]. 地理科学, 2021, 41(2): 223-231.[31] 余伟, 陈强, 陈华. 不同环境政策工具对技术创新的影响分析——基于2004—2011年我国省级面板数据的实证研究[J]. 管理评论, 2016, 28(1): 53-61.[32] 汪辉平, 王增涛, 王美霞. 知识资本、空间溢出与中国工业全要素生产率[J]. 山西财经大学学报, 2016, 38(5):1-10.[33] 袁博, 刘凤朝. 技术创新、FDI与城镇化的动态作用机制研究[J]. 经济学家, 2014,26(10): 60-66.[34] 王芋朴, 陈宇学. 环境规制、金融发展与企业技术创新[J]. 科学决策, 2022,29(1): 65-78.[35] 郝寿义, 张永恒. 环境规制对经济集聚的影响研究——基于新经济地理学视角[J]. 软科学, 2016, 30(4): 27-30.[36] 肖仁桥, 陈忠卫, 钱丽. 异质性技术视角下中国高技术制造业创新效率研究[J]. 管理科学, 2018, 31(1): 48-68.[37] 沈可, 李雅凝. 中国的人口老龄化如何影响科技创新——基于系统GMM方法与动态面板门槛模型的经验证据[J]. 人口研究, 2021, 45(4): 100-113.[38] HANSEN B E. Threshold effects in non-dynamic panels: estimation, testing, and inference[J]. Journal of Econometrics, 1999, 93(2): 345-368.[39] 邵兴宇, 范德胜. 绿色风险投资抑制了碳排放吗——基于绿色技术创新视角的实证研究[J]. 重庆理工大学学报(社会科学), 2022, 36(4): 55-68.[40] 蒋晓敏, 周战强, 张博尧. 数字普惠金融与流动人口家庭相对贫困[J]. 中央财经大学学报, 2022,42(3): 45-58. |
|
|
|
