|
|
|
| The Influence of Science and Technology Promotion Service Industry on Regional Innovation Efficiency：An Example from the Three Major Eastern Urban Agglomerations |
| Ye Tanglin,Li Lu,Wang Xueying |
| (School of Urban Economics and Public Administration, Capital University of Economics and Business, Beijing 100070, China) |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Since the beginning of the 21st century,China's scientific and technological innovation capability has been continuously improved. As important space carriers for accelerating the construction of an innovative country and participating in global competition, the three major urban agglomerations in eastern China are still facing many problems, such as uneven spatial distribution of innovation resources, blocked supply and demand information channels, imperfect construction of innovation ecosystem, etc., restricting the improvement of urban agglomerations’ innovation efficiency and affect the implementation of China's innovation driven development strategy. The science and technology service industry can provide technology, information and other services to innovation subjects, promoting the cultivation of regional innovation ecology and regional innovation.#br#Existing studies have shown that science and technology service industry has a positive impact on the improvement of regional innovation ability and innovation level, but there is a lack of discussion on the role of science and technology service industry, especially science and technology promotion and related service industries in regional innovation efficiency. Based on previous studies, this paper takes the three major urban agglomerations in eastern China as the research object, comprehensively explores the impact of the development of science and technology promotion service industry on regional innovation efficiency from the two levels of linear and non-linear mechanism, and looks for the optimal path for cities in different stages of innovation capacity and economic development to improve innovation efficiency, so as to provide a scientific basis for urban agglomerations’ innovation efficiency improvement. In addition, this paper uses enterprise big data as an effective supplement to statistical data, and subdivides science and technology promotion and application services into technology promotion services, intellectual property services, and other science and technology promotion services for more in-depth and detailed research. #br#The study uses the stochastic foreword model to measure the innovation efficiency of the three major urban agglomerations in eastern China as a whole and the cities within the urban agglomerations. It is found that the innovation efficiency of the three major urban agglomerations in eastern China is increasing year by year, but there is still a large gap in innovation efficiency among the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Urban agglomerations, the Yangtze River Delta and the Pearl River Delta urban agglomerations. Then based on the panel data of the three major urban agglomerations in eastern China from 2010 to 2019, this paper uses panel regression, intermediary effect and threshold model to investigate the impact and mechanism of the development of science and technology promotion service industry on the innovation efficiency of the three major urban agglomerations in eastern China. It is found firstly the development of science and technology extension service industry can not only directly improve the innovation efficiency of the three major eastern urban agglomerations, but also indirectly drive the improvement of regional innovation efficiency by promoting the upgrading of industrial structure; secondly there is regional heterogeneity in the impact of the development of science and technology extension service industry on the innovation efficiency of the three eastern urban agglomerations, which shows that the development of science and technology extension service industry of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei and Pearl River Delta urban agglomerations has a significant positive impact on the innovation efficiency, while the development of science and technology extension service industry of Yangtze River Delta urban agglomerations has no significant impact on the innovation efficiency, and the effect intensity of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomerations is greater than that of Pearl River Delta urban agglomerations; thirdly the development of science and technology extension service industry has a heterogeneous effect on cities with different levels of innovation ability or at different stages of economic development. It is shown that when a region's innovation ability reaches a certain level, the development of science and technology extension service industry will have a positive effect on the improvement of regional innovation efficiency. Moreover the effect of the development of science and technology extension service industry on the improvement of regional innovation efficiency in regions with high economic development level is lower than that in regions with relatively low economic development level.#br#It is suggested to develop science and technology promotion service industry with great efforts, implement differentiated regional innovation and development strategies according to local conditions to comprehensively improve the innovation efficiency of cities and urban agglomerations, as well as promote the deep integration of innovation chain and industry chain and construct a new development pattern with mutual promotion of innovation and industry.#br#
|
|
Received: 07 March 2022
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] KOOPMANS T . Activity analysis of production and allocation[M]. Wiley, 1951.[2] AFRAIT S N. Efficiency estimation of production functions[J].International Economic Review,1972,13(3):568-598.[3] 许建红,梁玲,孔令丞.东部12省市科技创新效率的DEA测评与上海科创策略研究[J].上海对外经贸大学学报,2019,26(2):59-68.[4] 盛彦文,骆华松,宋金平，等.中国东部沿海五大城市群创新效率、影响因素及空间溢出效应[J].地理研究,2020,39(2):257-271.[5] 杨力,刘敦虎,魏奇锋.城市群技术创新与经济增长效率的时空分异研究——以成都城市群为例[J].经济体制改革,2020，38(1):43-52.[6] 兰海霞,赵雪雁.中国区域创新效率的时空演变及创新环境影响因素[J].经济地理,2020,40(2):97-107.[7] 盛彦文,苟倩,宋金平.城市群创新联系网络结构与创新效率研究——以京津冀、长三角、珠三角城市群为例[J].地理科学,2020,40(11):1831-1839.[8] 李秦阳.基于随机前沿方法的区域创新效率影响因素分析[J].统计与决策,2019,35(14):108-111.[9] 朱文涛,顾乃华.科技服务业集聚是否促进了地区创新——本地效应与省际影响[J].中国科技论坛,2017,33(11):83-92，98.[10] 曹允春,王尹君.科技服务业集聚对科技创新的非线性影响研究——基于门槛特征和空间溢出视角[J].华东经济管理,2020,34(10):31-39.[11] 秦松松,董正英.科技服务业集聚对区域创新产出的空间溢出效应研究——基于本地溢出效应和跨区域溢出效应的分析[J].管理现代化,2019,39(2):40-44.[12] 李晓龙,冉光和,郑威.科技服务业空间集聚与企业创新效率提升——来自中国高技术产业的经验证据[J].研究与发展管理,2017,29(4):1-10.[13] 肖文,林高榜.政府支持、研发管理与技术创新效率——基于中国工业行业的实证分析[J].管理世界,2014，30(4):71-80.[14] 陆远权,秦佳佳.中国城市规模分布对区域创新效率的影响研究[J].经济经纬,2018,35(6):1-7.[15] BATTESE G E, COELLI T J. Frontier production functions, technical efficiency and panel data: with application to paddy farmers in India[J]. Journal of Productivity Analysis,1992,3(1/2):153-169.[16] 王聪,朱先奇,刘玎琳，等.京津冀协同发展中科技资源配置效率研究——基于超效率DEA-面板Tobit两阶段法[J].科技进步与对策,2017,34(19):47-52.[17] 席增雷,袁青川,徐伟.基于Malmquist-TFP模型的京津冀地区科技创新经济效率评价[J].宏观经济研究,2018,40(7):132-140.[18] 赵增耀,章小波,沈能.区域协同创新效率的多维溢出效应[J].中国工业经济,2015,32(1):32-44.[19] 张继良,张君华,丁子和.技术创新效率与差异变动分析——基于江苏实证[J].南京财经大学学报,2012,30(1):13-20.[20] 刘钒,邓明亮.国家高新区对外贸易、高新技术企业占比影响创新效率的实证研究[J].科技进步与对策,2019,36(24):37-44.[21] 吴延兵.R&D存量、知识函数与生产效率[J].经济学(季刊),2006，6(3):1129-1156.[22] 许福志,徐蔼婷.中国创新两阶段效率及影响因素——基于社会资本理论视角[J].经济学家,2019,31(4):71-79.[23] 赵庆.产业结构优化升级能否促进技术创新效率[J].科学学研究,2018,36(2):239-248.[24] HANSEN B E.Threshold effects in non-dynamic panels:estimation, testing and inference[J].Journal of Econometrics,1999，93 (2)：315-368.[25] 王燕,徐妍.中国制造业空间集聚对全要素生产率的影响机理研究——基于双门限回归模型的实证分析[J].财经研究,2012,38(3):135-144.[26] 王智毓,冯华.科技服务业发展对中国经济增长的影响研究[J].宏观经济研究,2020(6):102-113，121.[27] 刘湘云,周铚翔.粤港澳大湾区技术创新效率评价研究——基于面板SFA随机前沿模型实证[J].科技管理研究,2020,40(7):67-74.[28] 范德成,谷晓梅.高技术产业技术创新效率关键影响因素分析——基于DEA-Malmquist和BMA方法的实证研究[J].科研管理,2022,43(1):70-78.[29] LUCCHETTI R， G PALOMBA. Nonlinear adjustment in US bond yields:an empirical model with conditional heteroscedasticity[J].Economic Modelling,2009,26(3):659-667.[30] 齐元静,杨宇,金凤君. 中国经济发展阶段及其时空格局演变特征[J].地理学报,2013,68(4):517-531. |
|
|
|
