|
|
|
| Scientific and Technological Governance in the Construction of Digital Society and Its Legal Guarantee |
| Liu Hua1,Liu Xiuhua2,Yang Jiwen3 |
| （1.School of Law,Guizhou University,Guiyang 550025,China;2.School of Law,Southwestern University of Finance and Economic,Chengdu 611130,China；3.School of Criminal Law, East China University of Political Science and Law, Shanghai 200042, China） |
|
|
|
|
Abstract In recent years, scientific and technological governance in the construction of digital society has attracted the attention of many scholars, but most of them are relatively scattered when analyzing the problems and there is no systematic science and technology governance system. The construction of science and technology governance system and the improvement of science and technology governance ability are affected by various factors. China is in the process of building a digital society. The emergence of new technologies and new business modes such as big data, artificial intelligence and blockchain shows that there has been a qualitative leap in information science and technology development, and the resulting social contradictions are gradually diversified and complicated. Social governance are full of twists and turns, presenting the characteristics of complexity and modernity. In the era of digital age, it is the due meaning of realizing the modernization of national governance system and promoting governance ability by the innovative development of scientific and technological governance system. The construction of digital society is the inevitable requirement of the times, and the construction of scientific and technological governance system has become an urgent problem accordingly.#br#At the requirements of "responding to the rule of law" and the social demand for law, this paper re-examines the defects of the existing legal system. Aiming to realize the practice of science and technology governance by improving the relevant legislation of science and technology governance procedures and mechanisms, it analyzes a series of problems existing in science and technology governance in digital society construction of China at the present stage, such as the absence of scientific and technological governance supervision, the single scope of power subjects, the conflict with the protection of individual rights in scientific and technological innovation and development, and the unclear authority among various governance subjects. This paper puts forward corresponding countermeasures and suggestions from four aspects: supervision, subject, right and power. On the regulatory level,the joint role of legal supervision and social supervision should be strengthened and the external regulatory role of news media, individual citizens and social organizations should be given full play. On the subject level, a collaborative governance model of all parties should be established and the two forms of "government rule" and "expert rule" in science and technology governance should be abandoned. A collaborative governance model of all parties could be built to encourage the public to participate in science and technology evaluation and decision-making, so as to make science and technology research and innovation move towards a new model of democratic governance. On the right level, the right attribute of personal data in the construction of digital society should be defined so that the conflicts between the development of scientific and technological innovation and the protection of personal rights can be solved. On the power level, the governance subjects should be empowered. If the division of power and responsibility among government departments, scientific research experts and the public in the practice of science and technology governance is clarified and the boundary of governance behavior authority between governance subjects is clear, excessive or inadequate government power can be avoided, which shall promote the realization of science and technology governance objectives.#br#Based on the concept of responsive rule of law, this paper realizes the construction of response rule of law system for science and technology governance in digital society. The research findings of this paper have guiding significance for the practice of rule of law in China. Firstly, the research on science and technology governance at present is still in an initial stage. The research countermeasures of this paper provides the direction for the systematic construction of science and technology governance. Secondly, it provides specific solutions for the practice of science and technology governance. With the innovation and development of science and technology, we need to constantly improve and adjust the governance system and science and technology governance measures, and finally achieve the goal of improving the overall governance efficiency.#br#
|
|
Received: 23 June 2021
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] 中国互联网络信息中心.第46次中国互联网络发展状况统计报告[EB/OL].(2020-09-15)[2020-12-03]http://www.cnnic.net.cn/hlwfzyj/hlwxzbg/hlwtjbg/202009/t20200929_71257.htm.[2] 于浩.迈向回应型法:转型社会与中国观点[J].东北大学学报(社会科学版),2015,17(2):193-197.[3] 黎昕.关于新时代社会治理创新的若干思考[J].东南学术,2018,31(5):124-131.[4] 刘军,李三虎.科技治理:社会正义与公众参与[J].学术研究,2010,53(6):21-26，159. [5] 鲍静,贾开.数字治理体系和治理能力现代化研究:原则、框架与要素[J].政治学研究,2019,35(3):23-32,125-126.[6] 王奋宇,卢阳旭,何光喜.对我国科技公共治理问题的若干思考[J].中国软科学,2015,30(1):1-13.[7] 许灵红.新形势下科技伦理治理问题探析[J].科技与创新,2020,7(10):74-76.[8] 杨继文.国家生物安全风险防控和治理体系背景下的基因风险协同治理模式构建[J].中国政法大学学报,2020,14(3):149-159，209.[9] 余秋莉.论人体生殖系基因编辑行为的刑法应对——兼评贺建奎“基因编辑婴儿”案[J].法律适用,2020,35(4):22-33.[10] 董慧,李菲菲.大数据时代：数字活力与大数据社会治理探析[J].学习与实践,2019,36(12):20-27.[11] 程啸.论大数据时代的个人数据权利[J].中国社会科学,2018,39(3):102-122,207-208.[12] 李华荣.技术正义论[J].华北工学院学报(社科版),2002,15(4):18-21.[13] 陈劲,朱子钦,季与点,等.底线式科技安全治理体系构建研究[J].科学学研究,2020,38(8):1345-1357.[14] 徐清.科技进步、社会治理与法治的共生共进——“科技进步、社会治理与法治”研讨会述评[J].法制与社会发展,2016,22(5):184-192.[15] 王禄生.论法律大数据“领域理论”的构建[J].中国法学,2020，37(2):256-279.[16] 高晋康,杨继文,赖虹宇,等.迎接智能法学的到来——首届中国法律大数据人工智能30人论坛综述[J].中国法学教育研究,2018，14(1):3-14.[17] 陈甦，田禾，吕艳滨，等.法治蓝皮书：中国法院信息化发展报告No.4（2020）[M].北京：社会科学文献出版社，2020：71-75.[18] 孔杰.大数据时代社会治理的困境与路径创新[J].行政与法,2019，36(12):60-66.[19] 贾开,蒋余浩.人工智能治理的三个基本问题:技术逻辑、风险挑战与公共政策选择[J].中国行政管理,2017，33(10):40-45.[20] 张晋铭,徐艳玲.人工智能助推中国特色社会主义国家治理的价值[J].甘肃社会科学,2020，42(5):61-68.[21] 张毅,肖聪利,宁晓静.区块链技术对政府治理创新的影响[J].电子政务,2016，13(12):11-17.[22] 朱婉菁.区块链作为治理机制的内在逻辑、风险挑战与政策因应[J].探索,2020，36(4):76-87.[23] 杨继文,范彦英.大数据证据的事实认定原理[J].浙江社会科学,2021，37(10):46-54.[24] 杨继文.区块链证据规则体系[J].苏州大学学报（哲学社会科学版）,2021，16(3):86-95.[25] 赵胤.从科技管理走向科技治理[J].人民论坛,2019，25(7):86-87.[26] 陈喜乐,朱本用.近十年国外科技治理研究述评[J].科技进步与对策,2016,33(10):148-153.[27] 胡若溟.迈向回应型法:我国科学技术决策立法的反思与完善[J].科技进步与对策,2018,35(15):105-112.[28] 刘远翔.美国科技体系治理结构特点及其对我国的启示[J].科技进步与对策,2012,29(6):96-99.[29] CRESPY C,HERAUD J,PERRY B. Multi-levelgovernance,regions and science in Finance: between competition and equality[J].Regional Studies,2007,41(8):1069-1084.[30] 许可.从监管科技迈向治理科技——互联网金融监管的新范式[J].探索与争鸣,2018，34(10):23-25，141.[31] 谢尧雯,赵鹏.科技伦理治理机制及适度法制化发展[J].科技进步与对策,2021,38(16):109-116.[32] 陈强强.中国深度参与全球科技治理的机遇、挑战及对策研究[J].山东科技大学学报(社会科学版),2020,22(2):1-12.[33] 许可.个人信息治理的科技之维[J/OL].东方法学:1-12[2021-09-29].https://doi.org/10.19404/j.cnki.dffx.20210906.011.[34] 朱本用,陈喜乐.试论科技治理的柔性模式[J].自然辩证法研究,2019,35(10):44-49. |
|
|
|
