|
|
|
| The Effect of Science and Technology Innovation and Government Collaborative Governance in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Science and Technology Parks |
| Chen Xudong,Wang Yu,Li Simeng |
| (School of Public Finance and Administration，Tianjin University of Finance and Economics, Tianjin 300222, China) |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Reports of the 19th National Congress of CPC points out that China's economy has stepped into high-quality development from high-speed growth. Innovation serves as the driving force of high-quality development, in which we must give full play to the supporting and leading role of scientific and technological innovation. We should enrich and improve original development strategy, and emphasize the establishment of efficient mechanism for regional coordinated development while continuing to implement regional development strategy. Governments are seeking cross-regional collaborative governance, and the joint governance structure is gradually taking shape. Coordinated development of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei has become a typical example of cooperative governance by local governments and a new growth for promoting regional development and innovating development mode. Cooperation of science and technology parks help to promote the sharing of science and technology resource and enhance their competitiveness. Since the synergy strategy was carried out, governments of the three places have strived to promote innovation and collaborative governance in terms of policy synergy, industrial cooperation and innovation synergy, valued scientific and technological cooperation and resource allocation among the three regions.#br#As a key part in collaborative governance, the government regulates collaborative governance through management and leadership to ensure its orderly operation. Therefore, collaborative governance ability of the government is one of the core issues concerned by current scholars. However, the problems revealed by Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei governments in the coordination process of science and technology parks, such as the rationality of innovation resources and talent allocation, innovation output, and the consistency of the flow and sharing of science and technology resources, which reflects the deficiencies in coordinated governance by the three local governments. Therefore, this paper focuses on the innovation synergy of science and technology parks of the three areas. By exploring the interaction mechanism between cross-regional governance and science and technology park synergy, this paper measures the innovation synergy of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei national science and technology parks from 2014 to 2019 by using synergetic degree model of composite system method from an empirical perspective, and looks for the problems existing in cooperative governance between governments in China.#br#The results show that from 2014 to 2019, the order degree and coordination degree of the innovation system in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei science and technology parks have been increasing on the whole, which proves that the order degree and coordination degree of innovation coordination in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei science and technology parks have been improving year by year. However, due to insufficient driving effect of Zhong Guan Cun science park, Beijing, serious administrative system barriers and differences in resource endowments among the three regions, it is difficult for industrial transfer being completed in the park with inadequte market vitality, which leads to the lack of medium and high coordination among the three regions.#br#In order to speed up the scientific and technological innovation and improve collaborative governance in the three regions, the governments need to abandon traditional administrative concept, and gradually adapt in the continuous cooperation. However, the change of ideology is the prerequisite for the realization of trans-regional cooperation. Meanwhile the government should give full play to the intermediary force, build and improve the coordination and linkage mechanism among the local governments. It is also vital to form trans-regional cooperative governance mode and benefit sharing mechanism, constantly improve the coordination and innovation capacity and form large-scale industrial clusters to enhance the supporting capacity of collaborative innovation. This paper constructs an evaluation index system for the innovation synergy system of science and technology parks in three regions, and provides feasible strategies for improving collaborative governance among Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei governments and promoting regional economic development, which will help to achieve the strategic goal of collaborative development of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei, continue to promote in depth the coordination of the three regions, and enrich researches on cross-regional governance in China.#br#
|
|
Received: 08 November 2021
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] YONGFEI JIA, CHANG LIU, CHONG YIN ,et al. The construction of science and technology innovation policy design framework—take Shandong Province as an example [J]. Journal of Industry-University Collaboration, 2020,1:34-48.[2] PINTO HUGO, GUERREIRO JOAO. Innovation regional planning and latent dimensions: the case of the algarve region[J]. Annals of Regional Science, 2010, 44(2):315-329.[3] YONG'AN Z, ZHE G， JIE T. China's regional science and technology innovation policy:a classification based on data from Zhongguancun science park[J].International Journal of Innovation Science, 2016, 8(1):71-88.[4] ZHAO S L,CACCIOLATTI L,LEE S H，et al. Regional collaborations and indigenous innovation capabilities in China: a multivariate method for the analysis of regional innovation systems[J]. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 2015, 94: 202-220.[5] 陈智国,张文松.跨区域产业集群协同创新测度研究——基于京津冀区域协作的实证分析[J].求索,2017,38(7):80-85.[6] 殷阿娜,邓思远.京津冀绿色创新协同度评估及影响因素分析[J].工业技术经济,2017,36(5):52-60.[7] 李素梅,黄衍枝.京津冀区域金融结构与技术创新协同发展研究——基于复合系统协调度模型[J].科技管理研究,2017,37(17):99-108.[8] 祝尔娟,何皛彦.京津冀协同创新水平测度与提升路径研究[J].河北学刊,2020,40(2):137-144.[9] 张满银,全荣.京津冀区域协同发展评估[J].统计与决策, 2020,36（4）: 72-76.[10] 崔志新,陈耀.区域技术协同创新效率测度及其演变特征研究——以京津冀和长三角区域为例[J].当代经济管理,2019,41(3):61-66.[11] 姚东旭.京津冀协同创新是否存在“虹吸效应”——基于与珠三角地区对比分析的视角[J].经济理论与经济管理,2019,39(9):89-97.[12] 龙晓君,洪秋鑫,李小建.粤港澳大湾区、长三角、京津冀城市群科技创新辐射空间格局及效应测算[J].统计与决策,2021,37(24):62-66.[13] 谢泗薪,胡伟.经济高质量发展与科技创新耦合协调：以京津冀地区为例[J].统计与决策,2021,37(14):93-96. [14] 蒋海军.科技园区推动区域协同创新研究——以中关村科技园区为例[J].中国特色社会主义研究,2016,22(3):36-41.[15] 盛彦文,苟倩,宋金平.城市群创新联系网络结构与创新效率研究——以京津冀、长三角、珠三角城市群为例[J].地理科学,2020,40(11):1831-1839.[16] 苏文松,方创琳.京津冀城市群高科技园区协同发展动力机制与合作共建模式——以中关村科技园为例[J].地理科学进展,2017,36(6):657-666.[17] 叶堂林,祝尔娟.京津冀科技协同创新的基本态势[J].人民论坛,2019,28(12):88-89. [18] MARKS G.Structural policy and multilevel governance in the EC[M]//The State of the European Community. Boulder, CO: Lynne Riemer,1993: 391-409.[19] 翁士洪,周一帆.多层次治理中的中国国家治理理论[J].甘肃行政学院学报,2017，26(6):4-14,125.[20] ETZKOWITZ H,LEYDESDORFF L.The triple helix-university-industry-government relations:a laboratory for knowledge based economic development[J].EASST Review,1995,14:4-19.[21] 赵东霞,郭书男,周维.国外大学科技园“官产学”协同创新模式比较研究——三螺旋理论的视角[J].中国高教研究,2016，32(11):89-94.[22] 张艺,陈凯华.官产学三螺旋创新的国际研究:起源、进展与展望[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2020,41(5):116-139.[23] 肖国华,贺德方,张娴.基于互信息的四螺旋模型创新协同度研究[J].情报学报,2021,40(1):1-10.[24] 刘宾.协同发展中提升区域创新能力路径探讨:以京津冀为例[J].理论探讨,2021，38(4):84-90.[25] 李峰,徐付娟,郭江江.京津冀、长三角、粤港澳科技人才流动模式研究——基于国家科技奖励获得者的实证分析[J].科学学研究,2022,40(3):454-463. |
|
|
|
