|
|
|
| Synergistic Evolution MechanismBetween Fintech and Manufacturing Green Transformation and Regional Synergistic Differences：an Empirical Analysis Based on Haken Model |
| Xiong Xiaolian1,2,FanJian1 |
| (1.School of Economics, Guizhou University；2. High-end Think Tank on Grassroots Social Governance Innovation in Guizhou, Guizhou University，Guiyang 550000, China) |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Green manufacturing is one of the main directions of the manufacturing power strategy of “made in China 2025”, and also the direction and goal of China's manufacturing industry transformation. In order to fulfill the goal of "dual-carbon", it is urgent to build an efficient, clean, low-carbon and circular green manufacturing system, which also puts forward higher requirements for financial services. As the innovation of products and services in traditional financial industry, fintech is an important driving force for achieving green transformation in manufacturing industry. Existing literature pays high attention to the factors of the green transformation of manufacturing industry, industry differences and the relationship between fintech and industrial structure transformation or manufacturing structure optimization, but little focus on regional synergy and cooperative evolution law between fintech and the green transformation of manufacturing industry.#br#Therefor this paper sorts out the relevant literature at home and abroad, and explains the composition and operation of the manufacturing green transformation system, fintech system and the "fintech-manufacturing green transformation" composite system from the perspective of system science. The synergy theory is introduced into the composite system of "fintech-manufacturing green transformation", and its collaborative evolution mechanism is analyzed. The index system that measures the green transformation subsystem of manufacturing industry is constructed from the four dimensions of green development contribution, green innovation driven, green environmental regulation and regional green guarantee. The comprehensive index method is used to evaluate it’s state level, meanwhile, the digital financial inclusion index is used to measure the fintech subsystem. The panel data of 30 (excluding Tibet, Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan) provincial administrative regions from 2011 to 2019 in mainland China were selected to perform an empirical analysis. The collaborative evolution mechanism of the composite system of "fintech-manufacturing green transformation" was demonstrated by Haken model, and the synergistic difference of composite system in the four economic regional of China was measured by Theil index.#br#Compared with previous studies, this study for the first time introduces the theory of synergy into the research of the synergy relationship between fintech and the green transformation of manufacturing industry, and expands the research perspective. This study contributes to the existing literature in two aspects. First, as for research method, it not only explains the collaborative evolution mechanism of composite system, but also interprets the law of collaborative evolution by using Haken model. Second, as for research value, we study the coordination between fintech and the green transformation of manufacturing industry from a dynamic perspective, and explore the internal logic of the evolution. This paper provides a reference for policy-making which aims to make regional fintech better serve the green transformation of manufacturing industry.#br#Three conclusions were drawn from this study. First, there is a collaborative evolution mechanism in the composite system of "fintech-manufacturing green transformation", meanwhile, the structure and order degree of coevolution depends on the level of green transformation of manufacturing industry. Second, the average synergy level of the "fintech-green transformation of manufacturing" composite system is bounded by the "Made in China 2025" strategy which shows obvious stage characteristics. Third the synergistic differences of "fintech-green transformation of manufacturing" composite system in the different regions of China is small. However, there is an overall trend of expansion.#br#Three important implications are proposed accordingly. Firstly, we should accelerate the pace of green transformation of manufacturing industry to drive the coordinated development of fintech with the higher requirements of financial products and services for the green development of manufacturing industry. Only in this way can we improve the coordination level, promote the order and optimize the structure of composite system. Second, it is necessary to promote the green demonstration experience in manufacturing industry, and narrow the regional differences of composite system synergy. Third, guided by the concept of regional cooperation and regional coordinated development, we will improve the fintech support system for the green development of the manufacturing industry.#br#
|
|
Received: 01 November 2021
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] FANKHAUSER S, BOVWEN A, CALEL R, et al. Who will win the green race? in search of environmental competitiveness and innovation[J].Global Environmental Change, 2013,23(5):902-913.[2] THURNER T W, ROUND V. Greening strategies in Russia's manufacturing: from compliance to opportunity[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016,112(4):2851-2860.[3] DANGELICO R M. Green product innovation:where we are and where we are going[J].Business Strategy and the Environment,2016,25(8): 560-576.[4] SEZEN B, CANKAYA S Y. Effects of green manufacturing and eco-innovation on sustainability performance[J].Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2013,99(6):154-163.[5] HU D, FENG C, LIANG L,et al. Environmental performance of Chinese listing manufacturing enterprise:from investment perspective[J].Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2019,26(7):6625-6635.[6] MUOZ-VILLAMIZAR A, SZNTOS J, VILES E, et al. Manufacturing and environmental practices in the Spanish context[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2018,178(20):268-275.[7] 毕克新,王禹涵,杨朝均.创新资源投入对绿色创新系统绿色创新能力的影响——基于制造业FDI流入视角的实证研究[J].中国软科学,2014,29(3):153-166.[8] 徐建中,王曼曼.制造业集聚、技术进步与绿色创新绩效——对我国省际面板数据的实证分析[J].科技进步与对策，2019,36(12):54-61.[9] 王旭,褚旭.中国制造业绿色技术创新与融资契约选择[J].科学学研究,2019,37(2):351-361.[10] 屈小娥,胡琰欣,赵昱钧.产业集聚对制造业绿色全要素生产率的影响——基于长短期行业异质性视角的经验分析[J].北京理工大学学报(社会科学版),2019,29(1):27-36.[11] 师博,姚峰,李辉.创新投入、市场竞争与制造业绿色全要素生产率[J].人文杂志,2018,62(1):26-36.[12] 孙薇,侯煜菲,周彩红.制造业绿色竞争力评价与预测——以江苏省为例[J].中国科技论坛,2019,35(4):124-132,141.[13] 侯建,陈恒.中国高专利密集度制造业技术创新绿色转型绩效及驱动因素研究[J].管理评论,2018,30(4):59-69.[14] 李玲,陶锋.中国制造业最优环境规制强度的选择——基于绿色全要素生产率的视角[J].中国工业经济,2012,29(5):70-82.[15] 张小筠,刘戒骄,李斌.环境规制、技术创新与制造业绿色发展[J].广东财经大学学报,2020,35(5):48-57.[16] 朱俊杰,王彦西,张泽义.金融科技发展对我国产业结构升级的影响[J].科技管理研究,2017,37(19):31-37.[17] 侯世英,宋良荣.金融科技、科技金融与区域研发创新[J].财经理论与实践,2020,41(5):11-19.[18] 李洪东,郑联盛,武传德.金融科技助推产业链金融升级的缘由与路径[J].财会月刊,2021(1):135-141.[19] 李睿.金融科技是否推动了我国产业结构优化——基于空间效应和门槛效应的分析[J].经济与管理,2021,35(5):53-62.[20] 丁日佳,刘瑞凝.科技金融对制造业结构优化的双重效应研究——基于省级制造业面板数据的GMM估计[J].科技进步与对策,2020,37(12):55-63.[21] 辛大楞,邓祥莹.金融科技对制造业企业嵌入全球价值链的影响研究——基于世界银行调查数据的实证分析[J].国际商务(对外经济贸易大学学报),2021,35(3):55-63.[22] 巴曙松,白海峰,胡文韬.金融科技创新、企业全要素生产率与经济增长——基于新结构经济学视角[J].财经问题研究,2020(1):46-53.[23] HAKEN H. Synergetics: an introduction [M].New York: Springer-Verlag, 1983.[24] HAKEN H.Advanced synergetics [M]. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1983.[25] 熊晓炼,樊健.“一带一路”沿线省域金融生态系统协同演化机制与水平差异——基于哈肯模型的实证分析[J].工业技术经济,2021,40(12):58-65. [26] 李雪松,齐晓旭.长江中游城市群差异化协同发展的演化与分析[J].工业技术经济,2019,38(12):75-83.[27] 许冬兰,张新阔.中国制造业服务化的绿色福利效应研究——基于污染改善与环境TFP双重视角[J].中国地质大学学报(社会科学版),2021,21(4):56-72.[28] 李琳,楚紫穗.我国区域产业绿色发展指数评价及动态比较[J].经济问题探索,2015,36(1):68-75.[29] 唐勇军,李鹏.董事会特征、环境规制与制造业企业绿色发展——基于2012—2016年制造业企业面板数据的实证分析[J].经济经纬,2019,36(3):73-80.[30] 李春涛,闫续文,宋敏,等.金融科技与企业创新——新三板上市公司的证据[J].中国工业经济,2020,37(1):81-98.[31] 沈悦,郭品.互联网金融、技术溢出与商业银行全要素生产率[J].金融研究,2015,58(3):160-175.[32] 邱晗,黄益平,纪洋.金融科技对传统银行行为的影响——基于互联网理财的视角[J].金融研究,2018,58(11):17-29.[33] 王靖一,黄益平.金融科技媒体情绪的刻画与对网贷市场的影响[J].经济学(季刊),2018,17(4):1623-1650. |
|
|
|
