|
|
|
| Differences of Innovation Efficiency among Central, Eastern and Western in China from the Perspective of Industrial Agglomeration of Electronic and Telecommunication Equipment Manufacturing |
| Lai Hongbo,Wang Gaoxing |
| (Business School, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China) |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Main operating income of electronic and telecommunication equipment manufacturing comes from the communication equipment manufacturing industry.As the supporting industry of the communication industry, the electronic and telecommunication equipment manufacturing has a bright future.Therefore, taking the electronic and telecommunication equipment manufacturing as the research object, this study focuses on the impact of industrial agglomeration on regional innovation efficiency in the two-stage process of production innovation.According to the existing research, it’s generally believed that the traditional distribution of regional innovation efficiency is no longer high in the east and low in the west, and the difference of innovation efficiency among the eastern, central and western regions is gradually narrowing.However, after years of development, under the joint action of various factors, what is the current distribution of innovation efficiency in various regions of China? What factors will affect innovation efficiency? Are the paths of various factors affecting innovation efficiency the same? These questions need to be answered.In addition, there are few articles digging the efficiency of innovation process from the perspective of innovation value chain, and the government has a certain blindness in planning and making decisions on the development of regional related industries.#br#Therefore, using the provincial panel data from 2009 to 2019, from the perspective of innovation value chain, this study disassembles the innovation process of electronic and telecommunication equipment manufacturing into two stages: knowledge production stage and achievement transformation stage.Firstly, the industrial agglomeration of electronic and telecommunication equipment manufacturing in regions from 2009 to 2019 is measured by the location entropy index which is quantified by the number of employees in relevant industries.Secondly, the Malmquist index is used to calculate the innovation efficiency of each region in the two stages of innovation, and this paper compares the efficiency values of electronic and telecommunication equipment manufacturing in the eastern, central and western regions in different innovation stages.Finally, the stochastic frontier model is used to investigate the impact of industrial agglomeration on innovation efficiency in each stage.#br#The study draws the following conclusions.(1) The regional innovation efficiency of electronic and telecommunication equipment manufacturing in the eastern, central and western regions do not show the distribution characteristics of high innovation efficiency in the east and low in the west in the two-stage innovation process, and the distribution of innovation efficiency does not show obvious regional characteristics.(2) The industrial agglomeration of electronic and telecommunication equipment manufacturing does not show the traditional trend of high in the east and low in the west.In addition, the degree of industrial agglomeration of electronic and telecommunication equipment manufacturing in most regions is increasing year by year.Although the industrial agglomeration level of Beijing, Shanghai, Jiangsu and Tianjin is high, the overall industrial agglomeration level shows a downward trend.(3) The regional innovation efficiency of electronic and telecommunication equipment manufacturing in the knowledge production stage is generally higher than that in the achievement transformation stage,.It is consistent with the current development of China's high-tech industry.The differences of innovation efficiency in developed cities is much greater.The achievement transformation efficiency is higher than knowledge production efficiency in a few cities in Jiangsu and Yunnan.The innovation efficiency of electronic and telecommunication equipment manufacturing in Guangdong Province is generally at the optimal level in the two stages.(4) The industrial agglomeration of electronic and telecommunication equipment manufacturing hinders the improvement of regional innovation efficiency, which is more obvious in achievement transformation.This is unfavorable for innovation activities.The support of government funds and policies promotes the efficiency of regional innovation in the stage of knowledge production, but hinders the development of regional innovation in the stage of achievement transformation.#br#
|
|
Received: 13 October 2021
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] 沈能,周晶晶.基于两阶段共同边界DEA的国家大学科技园创新效率研究[J].管理工程学报,2018,32(2):188-195.[2] 曲晨瑶.产业聚集对中国制造业碳排放效率影响研究[D].南京：南京信息工程大学,2017.[3] MARSHALL A F.Principles of economics london: macmillan[J].Political Science Quarterly,1920,31(4):430-440.[4] FRITSH M, SLAVTCHEV V.Universities and innovation in space [J].Industry and Innovation, 2007,14( 2):201-218.[5] HART DAVID M.Founder nativity, founding team formation, and firm performance in the U.S.high-tech sector [J].Springer Science Business Media Published online, 2011 (5):1-18.[6] BROERSMA L, OOSTERHAVEN J.Regional labor productivity in the netherlands: evidence of agglomeration and congestion effects [J].Journal of Regional Science, 2009,49(3):483-511.[7] HONGYONG ZHANG.How does agglomeration promote the product innovation of Chinese firms [J].China Economic Review,2015, 35:105-120.[8] YUTAKA ARIMOTO, KENTARO NAKAJIMA, TETSUJI OKAZAKI.Sources of productivity improvement in industrial clusters:the case of the prewar Japanese silk-reeling industry[J].Regional Science and Urban Economics,2014,46(1):27-41.[9] 耿红军，王昶．后发国家技术创新能力国际研究的系统回顾[J].科学学与科学技术管理，2020,41(3):1-27.[10] 肖仁桥,宋莹,钱丽.企业绿色创新产出及其空间溢出效应研究——基于两阶段价值链视角[J].财贸研究,2019,30(4):71-83.[11] 余泳泽,刘大勇.我国区域创新效率的空间外溢效应与价值链外溢效应——创新价值链视角下的多维空间面板模型研究[J].管理世界,2013,29(7):6-20，70，187.[12] 于树江,王云胜,曾建丽,等.创新价值链下京津冀高技术产业技术创新效率及驱动要素研究[J].科学决策,2021,28(7):77-90.[13] 王宏伟,马茹,张慧慧,等.我国区域创新环境分析研究[J].技术经济,2021，40（9）:14-25.[14] 江三良,陈静.互联网发展对产学研协同创新效率的影响及时空差异研究[J].天津商业大学学报,2021，41（5）:54-61，67.[15] 戴德锋.中国西部地区区域创新能力比较研究[J].兰州工业高等专科学校学报,2007(4):54-57.[16] 王玉,许俊斌.中国高新技术产业发展效率的影响因素[J].经济管理,2011,33(9):17-25.[17] 王伟，孙芳城.高技术产业三阶段创新效率变动研究——基于内部非期望产出的SBM 模型与EBM模型[J].科技进步与对策,2018，35（3）:67-71.[18] 仇文杰.长江经济带高技术产业技术创新效率评价及区域差异研究[D].哈尔滨：哈尔滨工程大学,2020.[19] 陈怀锦,周孝.溢出效应、城市规模与动态产业集聚[J].山西财经大学学报,2018,41(1):57-69.[20] 孙超,王燕.高新技术产业与生产性服务业协同集聚对区域创新效率的影响[J].科技管理研究,2020,40(22):139-147.[21] MOLINA B M, OLIVER J H, BOIX R, et al.The importance of creative industry agglomerations in explaining the wealth of european regions [J].European Planning Studies, 2012,20(8):1263-1280.[22] 王飞航,王钰森.高技术服务业集聚对区域创新效率影响的门槛效应[J].统计与决策,2021,37(4):91-95.[23] 宛群超，袁凌．空间集聚、企业家精神与区域创新效率[J].软科学，2019,33(8):32-38.[24] EVA COLL-MARTINEZ, ANA-ISABEL MORENO-MONROY, JOSEP-MARIA ARAUZO-CAROD.Agglomeration of creative industries:an intra-metropolitan analysis for Barcelona[J].Regional Science,2019,98(1):409-431.[25] 谢露露.产业集聚和创新激励提升了区域创新效率吗——来自长三角城市群的经验研究[J].经济学家,2019，31(8):102-112.[26] LI YUJIAO, HAKANSSON JOHAN, MIHAESCU OANA, et al.Agglomeration economies in urban retailing: are there productivity spillovers when big-box retailers enter urban markets [J].Applied Economics Letters, 2019, 26(19): 1586-1589.[27] 陈佳贵,王钦.中国产业集群可持续发展与公共政策选择[J].中国工业经济,2005,23(9):5-10,33.[28] MICHELE BAGELLA,LEONARDO BECCHETTI.The "geographical agglomeration-private R&D expenditure" effect: empirical evidence on Italian data[J].Economics of Innovation and New Technology,2002,11(3):233-247.[29] 王雅洁,韩孟亚.高技术产业集聚与创新绩效的交互影响及空间溢出效应——创新价值链视角下的空间联立方程研究[J].科技进步与对策,2021,38(12):59-68.[30] 陈劲,梁靓,吴航.开放式创新背景下产业集聚与创新绩效关系研究——以中国高技术产业为例[J].科学学研究,2013，31（4):623-629.[31] 谢子远.高技术产业区域集聚能提高研发效率吗——基于医药制造业的实证检验[J].科学学研究,2015，33（2）:215-224，233.[32] 徐成立,张宝雷,张月蕾,等.中国体育产业政策文本研究——基于政策工具和创新价值链双重视角[J].中国体育科技,2021，57（3）:58-66.[33] GRILICHES Z.Issues in assessing the contribution of research and development to productivity growth[J].Bell Journal of Economics, 1979,10（1）:92-116.[34] JAFFE A B.Real effects of academic research[J].The American Economic Review, 1989，79（5）:957-970.[35] 周圣强，朱卫平.产业集聚一定能带来经济效率吗:规模效应与拥挤效应[J].产业经济研究，2013，12（3）: 12-22.[36] 孙祥栋,张亮亮,赵峥.城市集聚经济的来源:专业化还是多样化——基于中国城市面板数据的实证分析[J].财经科学,2016，60(2):113-122.[37] 潘文卿，刘庆.中国制造业产业集聚与地区经济增长—基于中国工业企业数据的研究[J].清华大学学报（哲学社会科学版），2012(1):137-147.[38] 陈朝月,许治.重审内部研发和外部技术获取之间的关系:基于动态视角分析[J].科研管理,2020，4（5）:10-20.[39] 蒋仁爱,李冬梅,温军.互联网发展水平对城市创新效率的影响研究[J].当代经济科学,2021,43(4):77-89.[40] 王必好,梁荣成.基于FAVAR模型的技术创新效率不确定性测度[J].中国科技论坛,2021,37(10):40-49,103. |
|
|
|
