|
|
|
| Innovation Effect of Enterprise Development Expectation:Empirical Study Based on Text Mining of Annual Reports of Listed Companies |
| Yang Bing1,Yang Yang2,Du Jian3 |
| (1.School of Economics, Guizhou University of Finance and Economics; 2.Big Data Application and Economics, Guizhou University of Finance and Economics; 3.School of Accounting, Guizhou University of Finance and Economics,Guiyang 550025, China) |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Innovation is the source of economic growth and the main driving force for sustained economic growth, and the decisive factor in promoting the high-quality development of China's economy. It also plays a vital role in the development of enterprises. However, innovation has the characteristics of high risk, large investment and long cycle, so that innovation are easily affected by inexclusiveness, indivisibility and uncertainty. Therefore, how to improve innovation output has always been the foundation of an enterprise in a highly competitive market environment. How to improve the innovation level of the enterprise, seize market resources has been the focus of the enterprise management. Starting from the development of the enterprise itself, this paper changes the traditional portrayal of the influencing factors of innovation. Based on the annual report text of the listed enterprises in Shanghai and Shenzhen from 2010 to 2018, we use computer text mining technology with sentiment analysis to measure the enterprise development expectation index, study the impact of enterprise development expectations on enterprise innovation and examine the innovation effect of enterprise development expectations under the financial stimulus mechanism and financing constraint mechanism. From the perspectives of industry heterogeneity, equity heterogeneity and economic development level heterogeneity,we study the innovative effects of enterprise development expectations in different industries, equity and economic development levels, the research results show that：(1) Enterprise development opportunity expectations, prospect expectations, and plan expectations all have a positive driving effect on corporate innovation, and the increase in risk expectations inhibits innovation output, but there is no evidence to support the impact of funding expectations on innovation. (2) The test results based on the fiscal stimulus mechanism showed that tax incentives did not significantly amplify the promotion effect of enterprise development opportunities and prospects on innovation, nor did it alleviate the inhibitory effect of risk expectations on innovation, but magnified plan expectations and funding expectations’ promotion effect of innovation; government subsidies are conducive to amplifying the promotion effect of enterprise opportunity expectations, prospect expectations, plan expectations and funding expectations on innovation, but it does not alleviate the inhibitory effect of risk expectations on innovation. (3) Financing constraints inhibited the promotion of innovation by enterprise development opportunity expectations, plan expectations, and funding expectations, but did not amplify the inhibitory effect of risk expectations on innovation. (4) There are differences in the impact of enterprise development expectations on innovation under the nature of different industries and the nature of equity.#br#Based on the conclusions, this article has the following enlightenment. (1) Enterprise development expectations are conducive to promoting enterprise innovation. Therefore, it is necessary to improve the company's future development opportunity expectations, prospects, plan expectations and funding expectations, while reducing enterprise development risk expectations. The government should actively improve the market environment and create a fairer market business environment, and clarify the government and market boundaries, create a fair and orderly market environment, ensure the rights of entrepreneurs, and enhance the company’s expectations for future development, to promote enterprise innovation. (2) Expanding tax incentives and government subsidies can promote enterprise innovation. The government implements preferential tax policies and government subsidy policies (fiscal stimulus) to further amplify the innovative effects of enterprise development expectations, so fiscal stimulus should continue to be implemented. However, in the process of implementing fiscal stimulus for enterprise innovation, it is necessary to increase the identification of enterprises with innovative capabilities to prevent excessive fiscal stimulus from causing enterprises to produce technological innovation inertia. (3) It is necessary to solve the problem of "difficult and expensive financing" for enterprises, broaden corporate financing channels and ease corporate financing constraints. On the one hand, companies should actively expand existing financing channels to solve the problem, the single source of corporate financing. On the other hand, enterprises should strengthen financial supervision, plan on the use of financing funds, encourage financing funds to enter enterprises in the R&D stage and promote enterprise innovation.#br#The research helps to clarify the effect and mechanism of enterprise development expectations on enterprise innovation, and provides an important theoretical reference for improving the innovation capabilities of Chinese enterprises.#br#Meanwhile there are some points to be improved in this paper. The Bert model with the highest classification accuracy is used to classify the information of the enterprises' future outlook in the annual message, divide the enterprise development expectation into five types and calculate the enterprise development expectation index combined with emotion analysis. Before text analysis, the text of the enterprise development of the annual report needs to be extracted and screened, but there may be deviations in the screening process. What' more, the annual reports of enterprises in this paper are mainly collected manually. The selected samples are listed enterprises before 2010, which means the listed enterprises after 2010 are not considered. #br#From the perspective of innovation, this paper studies the impact of enterprise development expectation on innovation, but the following problems need to be further explored. What factors affect enterprise development expectation? Do enterprises enjoy special policies and can micro factors such as entrepreneur management ability and entrepreneur self-confidence reverse affect enterprise development expectation? From the actual situation, at present, most Chinese enterprises have the problem of "disenchantment from reality to emptiness". Is such a trend related to enterprise development expectation? Can high-risk expectations affect enterprise investment bias, and is the preference of enterprise management for physical investment and financial investment different under different enterprise development risk expectation? The above problems are the direction of future research.#br#
|
|
Received: 07 January 2021
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] 刘诗源,林志帆,冷志鹏. 税收激励提高企业创新水平了吗?基于企业生命周期理论的检验[J]. 经济研究,2020,55(6):105-121.[2] MY N Q,SAYIM M,RAHMAN H. Debt financing and the failure of innovation companies:the application of the CHS model in US stock markets[J]. Global Economic Review,2019,48(2):180-212.[3] ATANASSOV J,LIU X D. Can corporate income tax cuts stimulate innovation[J]. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis,2020,55(5):1415-1465.[4] BRONZINI R,PISELLI P. Theimpact of R&D subsidies on firm innovation[J]. Research Policy,2016,45(2):442-457.[5] 杨兵,杨杨. 企业家市场预期能否激发税收激励的企业研发投入效应:基于上市企业年报文本挖掘的实证分析[J]. 财贸经济,2020,41(6):35-50.[6] 李常青,钟娟,王毅辉. 上市公司前瞻性信息披露动因研究[J]. 统计与决策,2008，24(20):135-137.[7] 王诗雨,王鹏. 利率政策、企业预期与现金流风险:基于事件分析的中国工业企业证据[J]. 华东经济管理,2017,31(7):172-180.[8] 徐捷,袁铭,郭红. 企业预期形成与预期偏误:基于企业层面调查数据的经验研究[J]. 金融研究,2016，37(1):116-129.[9] 周兵,钟廷勇,徐辉,等. 企业战略、管理者预期与成本粘性:基于中国上市公司经验证据[J]. 会计研究,2016，37(7):58-65,97. [10] ZELIK E,TAYMAZ E. R&D support programs in developing countries:the Turkish experience[J]. Research Policy,2008,37(2):258-275.[11] SHINKLE G A,SUCHARD J A. Innovation in newly public firms:the influence of government grants,venture capital,and private equity[J]. Australian Journal of Management,2019,44(2):248-281.[12] CASTELLACCI F,LIE C M. Do the effects of R&D tax credits vary across industries? a meta-regression analysis[J]. Research Policy,2015,44(4):819-832.[13] 毛捷,曹婧,杨晨曦. 营改增对企业创新行为的影响:机制分析与实证检验[J]. 税务研究,2020，36(7):12-19.[14] 赵立三,王梓楠. 基于企业盈利能力的所得税优惠与研发投入关系探析[J]. 税务研究,2020,36(5):111-117.[15] AKCIGIT U,GRIGSBY J,NICHOLAS T,et al. Taxation and innovation in the 20th century[R]. National Bureau of Economic Research,2018.[16] 沈国兵,袁征宇. 企业互联网化对中国企业创新及出口的影响[J]. 经济研究,2020,55(1):33-48.[17] 苗文龙,何德旭,周潮. 企业创新行为差异与政府技术创新支出效应[J]. 经济研究,2019,54(1):85-99.[18] 何瑛,于文蕾,戴逸驰,等. 高管职业经历与企业创新[J]. 管理世界,2019,35(11):174-192.[19] 王玉泽,罗能生,刘文彬. 什么样的杠杆率有利于企业创新[J]. 中国工业经济,2019,36(3):138-155.[20] 唐松,伍旭川,祝佳. 数字金融与企业技术创新:结构特征、机制识别与金融监管下的效应差异[J]. 管理世界,2020,36(5):52-66,9.[21] 李政,杨思莹. 国家高新区能否提升城市创新水平[J].南方经济,2019，37(12):49-67.[22] JAFFE A B,LE T. Theimpact of r&d subsidy on innovation:a study of new Zealand firms[J]. SSRN Electronic Journal, 2015(9).[23] 蔡竞,董艳. 银行业竞争与企业创新:来自中国工业企业的经验证据[J]. 金融研究,2016，59(11):96-111.[24] HALL B H. Thefinancing of innovative firms[J]. Review of Economics and Institutions,2010, 1(1): 1-30.[25] 鞠晓生. 中国上市企业创新投资的融资来源与平滑机制[J]. 世界经济,2013,36(4):138-159.[26] CHEMMANUR T J,KONG L,KRISHNAN K,et al. Top management human capital,inventor mobility,and corporate innovation[J]. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis,2019,54(6):2383-2422.[27] 王钊,王良虎. 税收优惠政策对高技术产业创新效率的影响:基于断点回归分析[J]. 科技进步与对策,2019,36(11):109-116.[28] 李春涛,闫续文,宋敏,等. 金融科技与企业创新:新三板上市公司的证据[J]. 中国工业经济,2020,37(1):81-98.[29] 郝项超,梁琪. 外汇风险对冲能否促进中国上市公司创新[J]. 世界经济,2019,42(9):151-172.[30] 陈艺云. 基于信息披露文本的上市公司财务困境预测:以中文年报管理层讨论与分析为样本的研究[J]. 中国管理科学,2019,27(7):23-34.[31] XU NH,LI X R,YUAN Q B,et al. Excess perks and stock price crash risk:evidence from China[J]. Journal of Corporate Finance,2014,25:419-434.[32] 肖文,薛天航. 劳动力成本上升、融资约束与企业全要素生产率变动[J]. 世界经济,2019,42(1):76-94.[33] 黄送钦,吕鹏,范晓光. 疫情如何影响企业发展预期?基于压力传导机制的实证研究[J]. 财政研究,2020，41(4):44-57,65. |
|
|
|
