|
|
|
| Changing with Time:Research on the Mechanism of the Timing of Feedback-Seeking to Creativity from the Perspective of Time Pressure |
| Wang Ning1,2,Zhang Wang1,Zhou Mi2,Ding Xuewei1,ZHANG Qian3 |
| (1.School of Management, Xi'an Polytechnic University, Xi'an 710048,China;2.School of Management, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710049,China；3.School of International Business, Shaanxi Normal University,Xi'an 710061,China） |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Previous studies on the relationship between feedback seeking and creativity have been proved to be influenced by strategies, feedback sources and potency, but the effect of the timing of feedback-seeking on creativity has been ignored.With the aggravation of time competition in enterprises, it is particularly important for employees to turn seeking feedback information into creativity.However, the definition and characteristics of the existing construction of the timing of feedback-seeking are not clear, and its mechanism of action on creativity is rare.Therefore, this paper first explores the connotation and characteristics of the timing of feedback-seeking through qualitative analysis, and reconstructs the scale; Secondly, according to the theory of explanation level and dual learning, this paper explores the mechanism of immediate and delayed feedback seeking on individual creativity from the perspective of time.The analysis of 364 data showed that immediate and delayed feedback seeking have significant positive effects on individual creativity; Dual learning mediates immediate / delayed feedback seeking and individual creativity.Immediate and delayed feedback seeking promote individual creativity through exploitative learning and exploratory learning, respectively; Time pressure positively regulates immediate feedback seeking and exploratory learning, and negatively regulates delayed feedback seeking and exploratory learning.
|
|
Received: 25 June 2021
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] 陈春花.数字化时代的三个特征[J].中国企业家, 2017, 4(24): 104-105.[2] DE STOBBELEIR K E M, ASHFORD S J, BUYENS D.Self-regulation of creativity at work: the role of feedback-seeking behavior in creativeperformance[J].Academy of Management Journal, 2011, 54(4): 811-831.[3] 王宁, 杨芮, 周密,等.求“表扬”还是求“批评”? 反馈寻求性质对创造力的作用机制研究[J].科技进步与对策, 2021, 38(3): 30-39.[4] 王石磊, 彭正龙.新员工反馈寻求行为对其创新行为的影响研究[J].管理评论, 2013, 25(12): 156-164.[5] SIJBOM R B L, ANSEEL F, CROMMELINCK M, et al.Why seeking feedback from diverse sources may not besufficient for stimulating creativity:the role of performance dynamism and creative time pressure[J].Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2017, 39(3): 1-14.[6] 颜爱民, 林兰.暗中监控还是直接询问? 高承诺工作系统对反馈寻求行为的影响研究[J].中国人力资源开发, 2019, 36(6): 6-20.[7] 徐珺, 尚玉钒, 宋合义.上级发展性反馈与创造力: 一个被调节的中介模型[J].管理科学, 2018, 31(1): 69-78.[8] KIM Y J, KIM J.Does negative feedback benefit (or harm)recipient creativity？the role of the direction of feedback flow[J].Academy of Management Journal, 2019: 1-64.[9] MORGESON F, MITCHELL T, LIU D.Event system theory: an event-oriented approach to the organizational sciences[J].Academy of Management Review, 2015,40(4): 515-537.[10] TROPE Y, LIBERMAN N.Temporal construal[J].Psychological Review, 2003, 110(3): 403-421.[11] KRIS B, SHALINI K.Rewards and creative performance: a meta-analytic test of theoretically derived hypotheses.[J].Psychological Bulletin, 2012, 138(4): 809-830.[12] ASHFORD S J, STOBBELEIR K D, NUJELLA M.To seek or not to seek: is that the only question?recent developments in feedback-seeking literature[J].Organizational Psychology & Organizational Behavior, 2016, 3(1): 213–239.[13] LAM CF, DERUE D S, KARAM E P, et al.The impact of feedback frequency on learning and task performance:challenging the "more is better" assumption[J].Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2011, 116(2): 217-228.[14] 王双龙.员工的时间压力对个体双元性的影响机制研究[J].软科学, 2018, 32(10): 62-66.[15] ASHFORD S J, BLATT R, VANDEWALLE D.Reflections on the looking glass: a review of researchon feedback-seeking behavior in organizations[J].Journal of Management, 2003, 29(6): 773-799.[16] KUVAAS B, BUCH R, DYSVIK A.Constructive supervisor feedback is not sufficient: immediacy and frequency is essential[J].Human Resource Management, 2017, 56(3): 519-531.[17] 孙晓娥.扎根理论在深度访谈研究中的实例探析[J].西安交通大学学报(社会科学版), 2011, 31(6): 87-92.[18] 吴兴海, 张玉利.创业机会的开发时机选择研究[J].管理学报, 2018, 15(4): 530-538.[19] HINKIN T R.A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires[J].Organizational Research Methods, 1998, 1(1): 104-121.[20] GONG Y, WANG M, HUANG J C, et al.Toward a goal orientation-based feedback-seeking typology: implications for employee performance outcomes[J].Journal of Management, 2017, 43(4): 1234-1260.[21] 段锦云, 张倩, 黄彩云.建言角色认同及对员工建言行为的影响机制研究[J].南开管理评论, 2015, 18(5): 65-74.[22] TROPE Y, LIBERMAN N.Construal-level theory of psychological distance[J].Psychological Review, 2010, 117(2): 440-463.[23] REYT J N, WIESENFELD B M.Seeing the forest for the trees: exploratory learning, mobile technology, and knowledge workersrole integration behaviors[J].Academy of Management Journal, 2015, 58(3): 739-762.[24] 黄海艳, 苏德金, 李卫东.失败学习对个体创新行为的影响——心理弹性与创新支持感的调节效应[J].科学学与科学技术管理, 2016, 37(5): 161-169.[25] 周国韬.自我调节学习论——班杜拉学习理论的新进展[J].外国教育研究, 1995, 4(3): 1-3.[26] MARCH G J.Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning[J].Organization Science, 1991, 2(1): 71-87.[27] 张俊, 刘儒德, 贾玲.反馈在自我调节学习中的作用[J].心理发展与教育, 2012, 28(2): 218-224.[28] 李雁晨, 周庭锐, 周琇.解释水平理论: 从时间距离到心理距离[J].心理科学进展, 2009, 17(4): 667-677.[29] GAVETTI G, LEVINTHAL D.Looking forward and looking backward: cognitive and experiential search[J].Administrative Science Quarterly, 2000, 45(1):113-137.[30] GONG Y, KIM T Y, ZHIQIANG-LIU.Diversity of social ties and creativity: creative self-efficacy as mediator and tie strength as moderator[J].Human Relations, 2020, 73(12): 1664-1688.[31] NAVEH E, KATZ-NAVON T, STERN Z.Active learning climate and employee errors: the moderating effects of personality traits[J].Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2015, 36(3): 441-459.[32] SYREK C J, APOSTEL E, ANTONI C H.Stress in highly demanding it jobs: transformational leadership moderates the impact of time pressure on exhaustion and work-life balance[J].Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 2013, 18(3): 252-261.[33] BAUMEISTER R F, BRATSLAVSKY E, MURAVEN M, et al.Ego depletion: is the active self a limited resource[J].Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1998, 74(5): 1252-1265.[34] DE DREU C K W, NIJSTAD B A, VAN KNIPPENBERG D.Motivated information processing in group judgment and decision making[J].Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2007, 12(1): 22-49.[35] DANNEELS E.The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences[J].Strategic Management Journal, 2002, 23(12): 1095-1121.[36] ATUAHENE-GIMA K, MURRAY J Y.Exploratory and exploitative learning in new product development: a social capital perspective on new technology ventures in china[J].Journal of International Marketing, 2007, 15(2): 1-29.[37] SEMMER N K, ZAPF D, DUNCKEL H.Assessing stress at work: a framework and an instrument[J].Work & Health Scientific Basis of Progress in the Working Environment, 1995: 105-113.[38] ZHOU, JING.When the presence of creative coworkers is related to creativity:role of supervisor close monitoring, developmental feedback, and creative personality[J].Journal of Applied Psychology, 2003, 88(3): 413-422.[39] LIU Q, SHAO Z, TANG J, et al.Examining the influential factors for continued social media use a comparison of social networking and microblogging[J].Industrial Management & Data Systems, 2019, 119(5): 1104-1127.[40] TICE D M , BAUMEISTER R F .Longitudinal study of procrastination, performance, stress, and health: the costs and benefits of dawdling[J].Psychological Science, 1997, 8(6): 454-458.[41] PRIETO-PASTOR I, MARTIN-PEREZ V.Does HRM generate ambidextrous employees for ambidextrous learning? the moderating role of management support[J].International Journal of Human Resource Management, 2015, 26(5): 589-615.[42] 刘人怀, 张镒.互补性资产对双元创新的影响及平台开放度的调节作用[J].管理学报, 2019, 16(7): 949-956. |
|
|
|
