|
|
|
| Evaluation and Comparative Study on Central Cities′ Innovation Primacy Ratio from the Perspective of Innovation Value Chain: Takeing Nanjing as an Example |
| Zeng Cheng1,Kai Yanhua2 |
| (1.School of Modern Posts, Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Nanjing 210023, China;2.School of Economic and Management, Nantong University, Nantong 226019, China) |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Based on the theory of Innovation Value Chain (IVC), this paper develops the theory and evaluation system of innovation primacy ratio, and makes a quantitative comparison between Nanjing and other central cities. The results show that:①In terms of the total-ratio, Nanjing not only falls behind other provincial central cities and national central cities including Xi’an, Chengdu, Wuhan, Zhengzhou and Guangzhou, but also has been lagging far behind Shenzhen and other competitive cities since 2008.②In terms of sub-ratios of R&D and industrial innovation, Nanjing ranks in the bottom of provincial central cities, and result in C quadrant of the two primacy-ratios matrix, which means Nanjing bears a significant unbalanced IVC.③The “funnel effect” of IVC is prevalent in provincial central cities, especially in Nanjing, which means primacy-ratios of knowledge innovation > R&D innovation > industrial innovation. This phenomenon also reflects considerable gaps in the technology innovation and transformation process.④Extension research on provincial central cities shows that the primacy ratios of innovation > economic > population, which is totally opposite to the ranking in terms of their developing speed in the last 10 years, indicating that innovation resource has stronger accumulative effect, and the administrative means should be limited in order to prevent the mismatch of innovation resource. Some policy proposals are given at the end of the paper.
|
|
Received: 22 January 2021
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] 徐琴. 省域发展的空间逻辑:兼论“强省会”战略的地方实践[J]. 现代经济探讨,2020，39(6):107-110.[2] 沈迟. 重读“首位度”: 南京发力中心城市影响力[N]. 新华日报，2019-05-20(021). [3] 叶南客. 优化城市功能 提升南京城市首位度[N]. 南京日报,2018-08-15(A11). [4] 吴明亮,毛庆. 全力建设具有全球影响力的创新名城:市委市政府召开动员大会 张敬华陈骏张广军讲话 缪瑞林主持[N]. 南京日报,2018-01-04(A01). [5] 刘根生. 南京的首位度首先是创新首位度[N]. 南京日报,2018-11-06(B02). [6] JEFFERSON M. The law of the primate city[J]. Geographical Review,1939,29(2):226-232.[7] 严重敏,宁越敏.我国城镇人口发展变化特征探讨[A]//人口研究论文集.上海:华东师范大学出版社,1981:20-37. [8] 刘大海,欧阳慧敏,李晓璇,等. 基于人口规模的沿海沿江城市群发展规律及对策研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境,2016,26(S2):119-123. [9] 王铮,岁磊. 基于经济增长视角下城镇化最优规模的测度[J]. 统计与决策,2019,35(12):58-61. [10] 段巍,吴福象,王明. 政策偏向、省会首位度与城市规模分布[J]. 中国工业经济,2020，37(4):42-60. [11] 魏守华,吴贵生. 我国省区科技空间分布特征、成因及其政策含义[J]. 管理世界,2005，21(4):20-27. [12] 肖泽磊,朱威鹏,范斐,等. 城市群创新投入的空间格局与创新绩效研究:以长江经济带所辖城市群为例[J]. 人文地理,2017,32(3):61-67,130. [13] 尹宏玲,吴志强. 极化&扁平:美国湾区与长三角创新活动空间格局比较研究[J]. 城市规划学刊,2015，59(5):50-56. [14] 韦胜,王磊,曹珺涵. 长三角地区创新空间分布特征与影响因素:以“双创”机构为例[J]. 经济地理,2020,40(8):36-42. [15] 周程,张杰军. 跨越创新过程中的“死亡之谷”:科技成果产业化问题刍议[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理,2010,31(3):50-55. [16] 刘树峰,杜德斌,覃雄合,等. 基于创新价值链视角下中国创新效率时空格局与影响因素分析[J]. 地理科学,2019,39(2):173-182. [17] HANSEN M T,BIRKINSHAW J. The innovation value chain[J]. Harvard Business Review,2007,85(6):121-130,142. [18] 王伟光,张钟元,侯军利. 创新价值链及其结构:一个理论框架[J]. 科技进步与对策,2019,36(1):36-43. [19] 余泳泽,刘大勇. 我国区域创新效率的空间外溢效应与价值链外溢效应:创新价值链视角下的多维空间面板模型研究[J]. 管理世界,2013，29(7):6-20,70,187. [20] BARTON B. All-out organizational scrum as an innovation value chain[C]//2009 42nd Hawaii international conference on system sciences. January 5-8,2009,Waikoloa,HI,USA. IEEE,2009:1-6. [21] 余泳泽,刘大勇. 创新价值链视角下的我国区域创新效率提升路径研究[J]. 科研管理,2014,35(5):27-37. [22] 住房和城乡建设部城乡规划司,中国城市规划设计研究院. 全国城镇体系规划(2006-2020年)[M]. 北京:商务印书馆,2010. [23] 武前波,惠聪聪. 新时期我国中心城市人口城镇化特征及其空间格局[J]. 世界地理研究,2020,29(3):523-535. [24] 赵康杰,吴亚君. 高铁网络与经济网络演进特征及协同关系研究:以中国省域中心城市为例[J]. 华东经济管理,2020,34(2):77-85. [25] 李元旭,曾铖. 政府规模、技术创新与高质量发展:基于企业家精神的中介作用研究[J]. 复旦学报(社会科学版),2019,61(3):155-166. [26] 张航,丁任重. 实施“强省会”战略的现实基础及其可能取向[J]. 改革,2020，37(8):147-158. [27] 黄南. 加快提升南京创新首位度的路径与战略举措[J]. 中国发展,2019,19(6):46-49.[28] 开燕华.长三角创业城市群落的引力网络与演化机制研究[D].上海：同济大学,2020. |
|
|
|
