|
|
|
| Research on the Measurement Change and Influencing Factors of Innovation Efficiency in National Innovative Counties (Cities) |
| Dong Keqin1,Zou Xiaowei2,Zhang Lingying3 |
| (1.China Science and Technology Exchange Center, Beijing 100045, China；2.Hubei Institute of Science and Technology Information, Wuhan 430071, China；3.School of Law, Humanities and Society, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430071, China) |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Building a national innovative county (city) is an important measure for China to fully implement the innovation driven development strategy and promote the innovative development of county economy. On this basis, this paper selects the first 50 national innovative counties (cities) as the research object, uses DEA model and Malmquist index method to make static and dynamic analysis on the scientific and technological innovation efficiency of the first national innovative counties (cities) in the three years from 2017 to 2019, and uses Tobit regression model to analyze the influencing factors of innovation efficiency. The research results of this paper show that the overall level of county scientific and technological innovation efficiency in China is good from 2017 to 2019. From the results of various indicators, the comprehensive technical efficiency, pure technical efficiency, scale efficiency and total factor productivity of national innovative counties (cities) are continuously improving, indicating that the scientific and technological innovation of national innovative counties (cities) has continued to improve in the past three years. At the same time, the results of Tobit regression model show that the four factors of innovation platform, innovation subject, education funds and innovation policy have a significant positive correlation with the level of county scientific and technological innovation, but the level of economic development has little impact on the efficiency of county scientific and technological innovation in innovative counties (cities).
|
|
Received: 19 July 2021
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] 李红兵.强化县域经济高质量发展的科技支撑[J].安徽科技,2020(12):1.[2] 尹昌斌,邱建军,林涛,等.我国创新型县市建设模式与途径[J].中国科技论坛,2007(3):67-70.[3] 王元亮.河南城市科技创新效率评价及影响因素研究[J].区域经济评论,2020(2):75-83.[4] FARRELL M J. The measurement of productive efficiency[J]. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (General),1957,120:253-290.[5] GARY D FERRIER，JULIE S TRIVITT. Incorporating quality into the measurement of hospital efficiency: a double DEA approach[J]. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 2013, 40: 337-355.[6] 岑聪.经济制度变迁与区域创新效率差距——来自中国省级层面的经验证据[J/OL].调研世界:1-10[2021-09-17].https://doi.org/10.13778/j.cnki.11-3705/c.2021.09.007.[7] 林海.粤港澳大湾区县域创新环境评价——以广东57个县（市）实证分析为例[J].科技管理研究,2020,40(12):85-95.[8] 彭晓静.京津冀城市群创新效率及影响因素研究[J].技术经济与管理研究,2021(2):118-122.[9] 肖仁桥,钱丽,陈忠卫.中国高技术产业创新效率及其影响因素研究[J].管理科学,2012,25(5):85-98.[10] 黄海涛,夏赟.工业企业技术创新效率测度与影响因素分析——基于新疆14个地州市的SU-DEA-Tobit模型分析[J].新疆农垦经济,2019(12):83-91.[11] 黄珂,张安录,张雄.中国城市群农地城市流转效率研究——基于三阶段DEA与Tobit模型的实证分析[J].经济地理,2014,34(11):74-80.[12] 陈锦其,周学武,潘家栋.浙江高水平创新型省份建设的进程评价——基于县市TFP与创新集聚效应的实证分析[J].治理研究,2020,36(5):88-95.[13] 姜帅,龙静.科技创新促进地区产业结构优化升级了吗？[J/OL].中国矿业大学学报(社会科学版):1-12[2021-09-18].http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/32.1593.C.20210910.1655.004.html.[14] 李庆祝,关铃,余鼎章.关于加大我国科技投入强度的战略思考[J].科技进步与对策,1997(3):22-24.[15] 赵中川.加大福建省财政科技投入的思考[J].福建农业学报,2011,26(5):892-894.[16] 李玉龙,崔梓涵.长三角县域创新投入与产出脱钩关系及效率研究[J].华东经济管理,2021,35(2):31-38.[17] 帅重庆.论构建东、中、西部协同发展战略格局──兼论“武汉经济区”的建设与发展[J].中南财经大学学报,1996(4):1-4,110.[18] 黎鹏.区域经济协同发展及其理论依据与实施途径[J].地理与地理信息科学,2005(4):51-55.[19] 秦响应,李俊强.京津冀协同下保定市科技创新对县域经济发展影响研究[J].经济研究参考,2016(26):30-35.[20] 徐维祥,刘程军.产业集群创新与县域城镇化耦合协调的空间格局及驱动力——以浙江为实证[J].地理科学,2015,35(11):1347-1356. |
|
|
|
