|
|
|
| Government Procurement Policy to Promote Independent Innovation of Science and Technology: Dilemma and Integration of Rule of Law-GPA Perspective |
| Gou Xuezhen |
| (School of Law, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China) |
|
|
|
|
Abstract As a demand-side policy tool, government procurement plays an important role in a nation's scientific and technological innovation. However, under the pressure of joining the Government Procurement Agreement (GPA), China has suspended the government procurement policy of independent innovation. Logically, the government procurement of scientific and technological innovation in our country at this stage features a dual orientation, thus facing a dilemma: internally, there is a realistic need to realize the strategy of strengthening China through science and technology; externally, its foreign affairs must be bound by international rules such as GPA. The root of the dilemma lies in too much emphasis on the opposition between securing the goals of scientific and technological innovation and meeting international rules, ignoring the synergy between the two goals. Therefore, the article puts forward the "third choice" of the coordination of the two goals, which is to achieve the integration of the dilemma through the rule of law, namely the legalization of policies. Through the choice of legislative model and legislative technology, the laws in this field are integrated and reconstructed, and the government procurement policy of technological innovation is gradually decomposed and integrated into relevant laws, so as to serve the needs of building an innovative country internally and externally. Meet the requirements of international regulations.
|
|
Received: 31 December 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] 李冬琴.政府采购对创新的促进:争议问题综述[J].中国科技论坛,2018,34(2):46-54.[2] 李民圣.习近平总书记关于自主创新的重要论述研究[J].毛泽东邓小平理论研究,2019,26(12):11-19,103.[3] 张幸临.我国加入GPA出价谈判:进程、前景及对策[J].国际贸易,2020,39(4):23-32.[4] 胡海鹏,袁永,康捷.符合国际规则的政府采购促进科技创新政策研究[J].科技管理研究,2020,40(6):63-68.[5] 袁永,李妃养,张宏丽.基于创新过程的科技创新政策体系研究[J].科技进步与对策,2017,34(12):92-98.[6] 宋河发,张思重.自主创新政府采购政策系统构建与发展研究[J].科学学研究,2014,32(11):1639-1645.[7] 艾冰,陈晓红.政府采购与自主创新的关系[J].管理世界,2008,24(3):169-170.[8] 黄军英.发达国家利用政府采购支持创新的政策及启示[J].科技管理研究,2011,31(17):22-25.[9] 曹润林.我国政府采购的自主技术创新政策功能效应研究[J].经济研究参考,2016,38(41):101-105.[10] 马承君,王建国,杨颖梅,等.政府采购政策对高新企业创新活动影响的效应分析[J].中国科技论坛,2018,34(7):26-36.[11] 胡凯,蔡红英,吴清.中国的政府采购促进了技术创新吗[J].财经研究,2013,39(9):134-144.[12] 李明,冯强,王明喜.财政资金误配与企业生产效率:兼论财政支出的有效性[J].管理世界,2016,32(5):32-45,187.[13] 赵宇.政府采购、创新导向与企业技术创新[J].辽宁大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2019,47(5):51-59.[14] 肖军.德国政府采购法促进中小企业发展规则之嬗变与启示[J].法学评论,2011,29(2):71-76.[15] 艾冰.欧美国家政府采购促进自主创新的经验与启示[J].宏观经济研究,2012,34(1):13-20.[16] 李广培.技术创新社会成本:理论与实证[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2015:30-32.[17] 克里斯托夫·弗里曼.技术政策与经济绩效:日本国家创新系统的经验[M].张宇轩,译.南京:东南大学出版社,2008:20-65.[18] 徐建中,荆玲玲.基于国家创新系统理论的企业核心竞争力外部动力要素识别研究[J].科技进步与对策,2009,26(8):70-73.[19] 潘冬晓,吴杨.美国科技创新制度安排的历史演进及经验启示:基于国家创新系统理论的视角[J].北京工业大学学报(社会科学版),2019,19(3):87-93.[20] 科林·斯科特.规制、治理与法律:前沿问题研究[M].安永康,译.北京:清华大学出版社,2018:4-5.[21] 植草益.微观规制经济学[M].朱绍文，胡欣欣，等译.北京:中国发展出版社,1992.[22] 柳卸林.技术创新经济学[M].2版.北京:清华大学出版社,2014:1-232.[23] 让·雅克·拉丰,让·梯若尔.政府采购与规制中的激励理论[M].石磊,王永钦,译.上海:格致出版社,2014.[24] 罗伯特·吉尔平.国际关系政治经济学[M].杨宇光,译.上海:上海人民出版社,2011.[25] 史蒂芬·柯维,布雷克·英格兰.第3选择:解决所有难题的关键思维[M].李莉,石继志,译.北京:中信出版社,2013:10-25.[26] 白列湖.协同论与管理协同理论[J].甘肃社会科学,2007,29(5):228-230.[27] A.C.L.戴维斯.社会责任：合同治理的公法探析[M].杨明,译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2015.[28] 梅术文.创新驱动发展战略下专利政策法律化路径研究[J].科技进步与对策,2014,31(1):111-115.[29] 裴俊巍,陈慧荣.碎片化权威主义下协同治理的司法路径:以“中国政府采购第一案”为例[J].经济社会体制比较,2018,34(5):95-103. |
|
|
|
