|
|
|
| Technology Ethical Governance Mechanism and Its Moderate Legalization Development |
| Xie Yaowen1,Zhao Peng2 |
| （1.School of Law and Economics, China University of Political Science and Law;2.School of Law-based Government, China University of Political Science and Law, Beijing 100088, China） |
|
|
|
|
Abstract The mismatch between technology development and legal regulation has created a need for an ethical approach to address the ethical issues raised by technology development. The development of "technology ethics" from a philosophical discipline or concept to a governance mechanism originates from the institutional exploration of the governance system of science and technology in the "continuous interaction between technology and society".Technology ethical governance mechanism aims at solving ethical dilemmas, exploring and reflecting on the ethical implications of technology, and providing ethical guidance for individual behavior. Technology ethical governance and legal governance enjoy different governance logics, and the reconciliation of the two is the focus of the improvement of the science and technology governance system. The governance model is characterized by "adaptive governance" and "soft regulation", and it is necessary to enhance the efficiency of ethical governance through moderate legalization development. It should adhere to two principles: restrict in apply the right-obligation mechanism to technology ethical issues, and promote ethical reflection by means of legal procedures; a multi-level regulatory system combining legal rules, administrative guidelines and self-regulatory regulations should be established. Through the multi-level normative system, the risk communication mechanism and ethical consensus reaching mechanism will be improved ,and the ethical principles implementation mechanism will be enhanced.
|
|
Received: 15 April 2021
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] ROGER BROWNSWORD，HAN SOMSEN. Law,innovation and technology:before we fast forward—a forum for debate[J]. Law,Innovation&Tech,2009,1(1):1-73.[2] GARY E MARCHANT. Addressing the pacing problem, in the growing gap between emerging technologies and legal-ethical oversight:the pacing problem[M].Springer,2011.[3] 赵鹏. 风险、不确定性与风险预防原则——一个行政法视角的考察[J].行政法学论丛,2009，8(1):187-211.[4] RUUD SMITS，JOS LEYTEN，PIM DEN HERTOG.Technology assessment and technology policy in Europe:new concepts,new goals,new infrastructures[J]. Policy Sciences,1995, 28(3):271-299.[5] LATOUR，BRUNO.Reassembling the social:an introduction to actor-network-theory[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press,2005.[6] DANIEL SAREWITZ.Anticipatory governance of emerging technologies,in the growing gap between emerging technologies and legal-ethical oversight:the pacing problem[M]. Springer,2011.[7] ERLING FELSOE，ARNE THING MORTENSEN. Moving the goalposts in bioethics, in genomics&society:legal,ethical&social dimensions[M]. Earthscan,2006.[8] CLAUDE KIRCHNER.The french national committee for digital ethics[EB/OL]. (2020-02-24)[2021-04-05].https://ai-regulation.com/the-french-national-committee-for-digital-ethics/.[9] JAMES H MOOR.Why we need better ethics for emerging technologies[J]. Ethics and Information Technology,2005,7(3):111-119.[10] 王学川.科技伦理价值冲突及其化解[M].杭州:浙江大学出版社,2016:31-32.[11] FEDERICA LUCIVERO.Ethical assessments of emerging technologies:appraising the moral plausibility of technological visions[M].Springer,2016:29.[12] JOHAN SCHOT,ARIE RIP.The past and future of constructive technology assessment[J].Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 1996,54(2-3):251-268.[13] JENNY DYCK BRIAN,ROBERT COOK-DEEGAN.What's the use? disparate purposes of U.S. federal bioethics commissions[J].Hasting Center Report,2017(6).[14] NIELSEN L, FABER BA.Ethical principles in European regulation of biotechnology-possibilities and pitfalls[M]. Copenhagen: Ministry of Economic and Business Affairs, 2002:72.[15] MONTGOMERY J. Reflections on the nature of public ethics[J]. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 2013,22(1):9-21.[16] JONATHAN MONTGOMERY. Bioethics as a governance practice[J].Health Care Anal,2016,24(1):3-23.[17] JONATHAN MONTGOMERY. Bioethics as a governance practice[J].Health Care Anal，2016,24(1):3-23.[18] RUHL J B.Regulation by adaptive management-is it possible[J].Minnesota Journal of Law,Science and Technology, 2005,7(1):20-57.[19] 王翠平.人胚胎基因编辑治疗的伦理分析——以CRISPR_Cas9技术为例[J].自然哲学辩证，2018,40(11):105-112.[20] BODDINGTON P. Towards a code of ethics for artificial intelligence[M].Cham:Springer,2017:57.[21] RYAN CALO.Artificial intelligence policy: a primer and road map [J].U.C.Davis L.Rev.,2017,51(1):399-435.[22] 田冬霞,张金种,侯军儒.中国伦理委员会运作现状的一个缩影——天津市三级医院伦理委员会的调查与分析[J].中国医学伦理学,2008，21(1):44-47.[23] CARL E SCHNEIDER.Bioethics in the language of the law[J].Hastings Center Report July-August, 1994(5).[24] The twenty-first century nanotechnology research and development act[Z].Public Law No: 108-153 (12/03/2003),2003.[25] TOM L BEAUCHAMP. Ethical theory and the problem of closure,in scientific controversies:case studies in the resolution and closure of disputes in science and technology[M].Caplan:Cambridge University Press，1987.[26] 赵鹏.风险评估中的政策、偏好及其法律规制——以食盐加碘风险评估为例的研究[J].中外法学,2014,26(1):28-45.[27] MONTGOMERY J.Rights, restraints, and pragmatism:the human fertilization and embryology act 1990 [J].Modern Law Review, 1991,54(4):524-534.[28] BRENT DANIEL MITTELSTADT, BERND CARSTEN STAHL,N BEN FAIRWEATHER. How to shape a better future? epistemic difficulties for ethical assessment and anticipatory governance of emerging technologies[J].Ethical Theory and Moral Practice,2015,18(1):1027-1047.[29] NORDMANN A. If and then: a critique of speculative NanoEthics[J].NanoEthics,2007,1(1):31-46.[30] PALM E,S O HANSSON.The case for ethical technology assessment[J].Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2006,73(5):543-558.[31] FJELD JESSICA, NELE ACHTEN, HANNAH HILLIGOSS, et al. Principled artificial intelligence: mapping consensus in ethical and rights-based approaches to principles for AI[J]. Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society, 2020(5).[32] JESSICA MORLEY,LUCIANA FLORIDI,LIBBY KINSEY,et al. From what to how:an initial review of publicly available AI ethics tools, methods and research to translate principles into practices[J]. Science and Engineering Ethics,2019,26(1):2141-2168.[33] BUOLAMWINI J, GEBRU T.Gender shades: inter-sectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification[J]. Proceedings of the 1st Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency,2018,81:77-91.[34] MAUREEN H FITZGERALD,PAUL A PHILLIPS. Centralized and non-centralized ethics review: a five nation study[J]. Accountability in Research,2006,13(1):47-74. |
|
|
|
