|
|
|
| Study on Influencing Factors of Behavior Intention of Knowledge Manipulation |
| Cai Ruilin1,2,Dai Keqing2,Qian Min1 |
| (1.School of business, Changshu Institute of Technology, Changshu 215500,China;2.Institute of Behavioral Sciences, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 211106,China) |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Knowledge (especially tacit knowledge) is the key resource for the survival and development of employees, and the incompleteness of knowledge rights determines the anomie behaviors such as cheating, stealing and speculation in knowledge exchange.In the collaborative innovation process, knowledge workers not only cooperate with each other but also compete with each other, thus in addition to knowledge sharing and knowledge hiding,employees usually choose the compromise knowledge manipulation strategy to manage their individual knowledge.This paper defines the connotation of knowledge manipulation and analyzes its four characteristics: self-interest, deception, uncertainty and concealment.Then based on the grounded theory method, the conceptual model of influencing factors of knowledge manipulation including ontology, subject, object, carrier, motivation, environment and fitness seven main categories was constructed through the step by step coding of interview data of 68 knowledge employees.Finally, centering on knowledge manipulation and governance, seven enlightenments are put forward as the following "optimizing the task attribute of innovation, giving play to the active role of knowledge manipulation objects, selecting efficient knowledge management carriers, cultivating the altruistic characteristics of employees, creating a collaborative innovation environment, and improving the fit between employees" .
|
|
Received: 26 April 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] KIMMERLE J, WODZICKI K.Value of information,behavioral guidelines, and social value orientation in an information-exchange dilemma [J].Group Dynamics Theory Research & Practice, 2011, 15(2):173-186.[2] FONG P S W , MEN C , LUO J , et al.Knowledge hiding and team creativity: the contingent role of task interdependence[J].Management Decision, 2018, 56(2):329-343.[3] CHATTERJEE S, SARKER S.Infusing ethical considerations in knowledge management scholarship:toward a research agenda [J].Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 2013, 14(8): 452-481.[4] 约拉姆·巴泽尔.产权的经济分析[M].费方域,段毅才,译.上海:上海人民出版社,1997:6.[5] CERNE M, NERSTAD C G L, DYSVIK A, et al.What goes around comes around:knowledge hiding, perceived motivational climate, and creativity [J].Academy of Management Journal, 2014, 57(1): 172-192.[6] RHEE Y W, CHOI J N.Knowledge management behavior and individual creativity: goal orientations as antecedents and in-group social status as moderating contingency [J].Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2017, 38(6): 813-832.[7] WANG S , NOE R A .Knowledge sharing:a review and directions for future research [J].Human Resources Management Review, 2010, 20(2):115-131.[8] 杨吕乐,张敏,张艳.国内外知识共享研究的系统综述:基础理论、知识体系与未来展望[J].图书馆学研究,2018,40(8):2-10.[9] 沈旺,王淇,李望宁.团队知识共享研究综述[J].图书馆学研究,2017,39(18):8-16.[10] CONNELLY C E, DAVID ZWEIG, JANE WEBSTER, et al.Knowledge hiding in organizations [J].Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2011, 33(1):64-88.[11] 张敏,马臻,张艳.用户知识隐藏行为综述:研究内容、知识体系与前沿主题分析[J].图书馆学研究,2018,40(14):2-9.[12] HARRIETTE BETTIS OUTLAND.The impact of information distortion within the context of implementing and sustaining a market orientation [J].Journal of Strategic Marketing, 1999, 7(4):251-263.[13] STEVEN MCCORNACK.Information manipulation theory [M].New York：John Wiley & Sons, Inc,2015.[14] 蔡瑞林,谢嗣胜,施杨.研发人员的知识操纵、资源获取与概念产品语义创新[J].科技进步与对策,2020,37(6):1-9.[15] STEINEL W, UTZ S, KONING L.The good, the bad and the ugly thing to do when sharing information: revealing, concealing and lying depend on social motivation, distribution and importance of information[J].Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2010,113 (2): 85-96.[16] FORD D P, STAPLES S.Are full and partial knowledge sharing the same [J].Journal of Knowledge Management, 2010, 14(3): 394-409.[17] ZHANG X, LIU S, DENG Z, et al.Knowledge sharing motivations in online health communities: a comparative study of health professionals and normal users[J].Computers in Human Behavior, 2017, 75: 797-810.[18] EMPSON L.Fear of exploitation and fear of contamination:impediments to knowledge transfer in mergers between professional service firms [J].Human Relations, 2001, 54(7): 839-862.[19] ZHAO H, XIA Q, HE P, et al.Workplace ostracism and knowledge hiding in service organizations[J].International Journal of Hospitality Management, 2016, 59: 84-94.[20] ERDEM K, MUSTAFA S.Knowledge manipulation in inter organizational networks: a new role for brokers[M].London: Academic Publishing Limited, 2009:452-457.[21] 张宝生,张庆普.基于扎根理论的社会化问答社区用户知识贡献行为意向影响因素研究[J].情报学报,2018,37(10):1034-1045.[22] KATHY CHARMAZ.建构扎根理论：质性研究实践指南[M].边国英,译.重庆:重庆大学出版社,2009:3.[23] 姚星亮,黄盈盈.论定性调查的人数问题:是“代表性”还是“代表什么”的问题——最大差异的信息饱和法及其方法论意义[J].社会科学研究,2010,32(4):108-115.[24] SY T.What do you think of followers? examining the content, structure, and consequences of implicit followership theories[J].Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2010, 113(2) :73-84.[25] GETZ D.Event tourism:definition,evolution and research [J].Tourism Management,2008,29(3):403-428.[26] 徐颖,姜思博,郭雯君.虚拟社区CSR共创中顾客契合对知识共享行为的影响研究[J].情报科学,2019,37(4):130-136.[27] 齐齐,赵树宽,余海晴,等.高校科学研究情境下人格特质对知识共享的影响: 以目标导向为中介变量[J].图书情报工作,2018,62(22):91-99.[28] 曹元坤,张倩, 祝振兵,等.基于扎根理论的团队追随研究: 内涵、结构与形成机制[J].管理评论,2019,31(11):147-160.[29] BECERRA-FERNANDEZ I,SABHERWAL R.Knowledge management: systems and processes [M].New York:Routledge, 2014.[30] RECHBERG I D W.Internalized values and fairness perception: ethics in knowledge management[M]//The Palgrave Handbook of Knowledge Management. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 2018: 249-272.[31] 霍亮,肖源.基于元分析的组织中员工知识共享影响因素研究[J].图书馆论坛,2018，38(9):102-107.[32] 曹树金,王志红.虚拟社区知识共享意愿与行为的影响因素及其调节变量: 元分析研究[J].图书情报工作,2018,62(8):74-83.[33] 李佳宾,朱秀梅,汤淑琴.知识共享研究述评与未来展望[J].情报科学,2019,37(5):166-172.[34] LIU Y, LI Y, SHI L H, et al.Knowledge transfer in buyer-supplier relationships: the role of transactional and relational governance mechanisms[J].Journal of Business Research, 2017, 78(9):285-293.[35] JADIN T, GNAMBS T, BATINIC B.Personality traits and knowledge sharing in online communities[J].Computers in Human Behavior, 2013, 29(1): 210-216. |
|
|
|
