|
|
|
| Does Harmony Bring Innovation? the Inversed-U Effect of |
| Xu Ke1,He Zhen2 |
| (1.School of Economics and Management,Tiangong University,Tianjin 300387,China; 2.College of Management and Economics,Tianjin University,Tianjin 300051,China) |
|
|
|
|
Abstract China is in a breakthrough period with wave of "mass entrepreneurship and innovation",all fields and industries,all positions and staff,actively advocate the spirit of "jointly building entrepreneurial creation and conspiring to innovate and create",and deeply analyze the influencing factors and suppressive effects of social capital and innovation driving force,which are the core links and key problems in building high-level scientific research teams and improving organizational performance.This research takes the newly created incubator project team in the science and technology incubator organization (technical business incubator,university science park and public creation space) in the Chinese cultural context as the research object,based on the perspective of relationship commitment and network routine,the logical concept model of "social capital—network routine /relationship commitment—innovation driving force" is constructed,and the multi-layer regression analysis method is used for empirical testing.Research shows that social capital has a inverted U-shaped effect on innovation driving force; network routine and relationship commitment actively and significantly influence innovation driving force,and they play moderating effect in the relationship between social capital and innovation driving force.
|
|
Received: 15 June 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] HANSEN M T,BIRKINSHAW J.The innovation value chain[J].Harvard Business Review,2007,85(6): 121-130.[2] CUEVAS-RODRíGUEZ G,CABELLO-MEDINA C,CARMONA-LAVADO A.Internal and external social capital for radical product innovation: do they always work well together[J].British Journal of Management,2014,25 (2): 266-284.[3] NAHAPIET J,GHOSHAL S.Social capital,intellectual capital,and the organizational advantage[J].Academy of Management Review,1998,23(2): 242-266.[4] KRATZER J,LEENDERS R,ENGELEN J.Managing creative team performance in virtual environment: an empirical study in 44 R&D teams[J].Technovation,2006,26(1): 42-49.[5] LEENDERS R,VAN ENGELEN J,KRATZER J.Virtuality,communication,and new product team creativity: a social network perspective[J].Journal of Engineering and Technology Management,2003,20(1): 69-92.[6] ROPER S,DU J,LOVE J.Modelling the innovation value chain[J].Research Policy,2008,37 (6-7): 961-977.[7] JACOBS J.The death and life of great American cities[M].New York: Random House,1961.[8] SALISBURY R H.An exchange theory of interest groups[J].Midwest Journal of Political Science,1969,13(1): 1-32.[9] BOURDIEU P.Algeria: the disenchantment of the world,the sense of honour,the Kabyle house or the world reversed[M].New York: Cambridge University Press,1976. [10] PUTNAM R D.Making democracy work: civic traditions in modern Italy[M].Princeton: Princeton University Press,1993.[11] HUBER F.Social capital of economic clusters: towards a network-based conception of social resources[J].Journal of Economic and Social Geography,2009,100(2): 160-170.[12] COLEMAN J S.Social capital in the creation of human capital[J].American Journal of Sociology,1998,17(2): 95-120.[13] FUKUYAMA F.Trust: the social virtues and the creation of prosperity[M].New York: Free Press,1995.[14] ZHOU J,SHALLEY C E.Research on employee creativity: a critical review and directions for future research[J].Research in Personnel & Human Resources Management,2003,22(3): 165-217.[15] AMABILE T M,STAW B M.Affect and creativity at work[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,2005,50(3): 367-403.[16] 杨燕,高山行.创新驱动、自主性与创新绩效的关系实证研究[J].科学学研究,2011,29(10): 1568-1576.[17] WANG A C,CHENG B S.When does benevolent leadership lead to creativity? the moderating role of creative role identity and job autonomy[J].Journal of Organizational Behavior,2010,31(1): 106-121.[18] 刘云,石金涛.组织创新气氛对员工创新行为的影响过程研究:基于心理授权的中介效应分析[J].中国软科学,2010,25(3):113-124.[19] GEORGE J M,ZHOU J.When openness to experience and conscientiousness are related to creative behavior: an interactional approach[J].Journal of Applied Psychology,2001,86(3): 513-524.[20] AMABILE T M,STAW B M.Affect and creativity at work[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,2005,50(3): 367-403.[21] UZZI B.Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: the paradox of embeddedness[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,1997,42(1): 35-67.[22] REAGANS R,ZUCKERMAN E W,MCEVILY B.How to make the team: social networks vs.demography as criteria for designing effective teams[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,2004,9(1): 101-133.[23] EGGERS J P,KAPLAN S.Cognition and capabilities: a multi-level perspective[J].The Academy of Management Annals,2013,7 (1): 295-340.[24] HANSEN M T.The search-transfer problem: the role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,1999,44(1): 82-111.[25] ADLER P S,KWON S W.Social capital:prospects for a new concept[J].Academy of Management Review,2002,27(1): 17-40.[26] 柯江林,孙健敏,石金涛,等.企业R&D团队之社会资本与团队效能关系的实证研究:以知识分享与知识整合为中介变量[J].管理世界,2007,23(3):89-101.[27] CAMPS S,MOLINA P.Exploring how social capital facilitates innovation: the role of innovation enablers[J].Technological Forecasting and Social Change,2014（88）: 325-348.[28] DE CLERCQ D,DIMOV D,THONGPAPANL N T.Organizational social capital,formalization,and internal knowledge sharing in entrepreneurial orientation formation[J].Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,2013,37(3): 505-537.[29] LUO X,GRIFFITH D A,LIU S S,et al.The effects of customer relationships and social capital on firm performance: a Chinese business illustration[J].Journal of International Marketing,2004,12(4): 25-45.[30] UZZI B,SPIRO J.Collaboration and creativity: the small world problem[J].American Journal of Sociology,2005,111(3): 447-504.[31] GOODMAN L E,DION P A.The determinants of commitment in the distributor-manufacturer relationship[J].Industrial Marketing Management,2001,30(3): 287-300.[32] FYNES B,VOSS C,DE BURCA S.The impact of supply chain relationship quality on quality performance[J].International Journal Production Economics,2005,96(3): 339-354.[33] ZHAO X,HUO B,FLYNN B B.The impact of power and relationship commitment on integration between manufacturers and customers in a supply chain[J].Journal of Operations Management,2008,26(3): 368-388.[34] HUO B,ZHANG C,ZHAO X.The effect of IT and relationship commitment on supply chain coordination: a contingency and configuration approach[J].Information & Management,2015,52: 728-740.[35] BROWN J R,LUSCH R F,NICHOLSON C Y.Power and relationship commitment: their impact on marketing channel member performance[J].Journal of Retailing,1995,71(4): 363-392.[36] RAMASESHAN B,YIP L S C,PAE J H.Powe，satisfaction，and relationship commitment in Chinese store-tenant relationship and their impact on performance[J].Journal of Retailing,2006,82(1): 63-70.[37] 叶飞，徐学军.供应链伙伴关系间信任与关系承诺对信息共享与运营绩效的影响[J].系统工程理论与实践,2009,29(8):36-49.[38] ZHAO X,HUO B,SELEN W,et al.The impact of internal integration and relationship commitment on external integration[J].Journal of Operations Management,2011,29(1/2) : 17-32.[39] 霍宝锋,韩昭君,赵先德.权力与关系承诺对供应商整合的影响[J].管理科学学报,2013,16(4):33-50.[40] LI J J,POPPO L,ZHOU K Z.Relational mechanisms,formal contracts,and local knowledge acquisition by international subsidiaries[J].Strategic Management Journal,2010,31(4): 349-370.[41] CHIRICO F,SALVATO C.Knowledge internalization and product development in family firms: when relational and affective factors matter[J].Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,2016,40(1): 201-229.[42] 陈学光,徐金发.网络组织及其惯例的形成:基于演化论的视角[J].中国工业经济,2006,23(4):52-58.[43] 徐可,何桢,王瑞.技术创新网络的知识权力、结构权力对网络惯例影响[J].管理科学,2014,27(5):24-34.[44] 党兴华,孙永磊.技术创新网络位置对网络惯例的影响研究:以组织间信任为中介变量[J].科研管理,2013,34(4):1-8.[45] 贯君，徐建中，林艳.跨界搜寻、网络惯例、双元能力与创新绩效的关系研究[J].管理评论,2019,31(12):61-72.[46] 王琴.网络治理的权力基础:一个跨案例研究[J].南开管理评论,2012,15(3):91-100.[47] 章丹.技术创新网络中核心企业网络能力对网络创新绩效的影响研究[D].杭州:浙江工商大学,2012:76-86.[48] 宋晶，孙永磊，陈劲.基于调节定向的网络惯例对合作创新绩效的作用研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2017，38(2):127-135. |
|
|
|
