|
|
|
| A Study on the Influence Mechanism of Top Management Team Cognitive Interaction on Innovation Performance: An Investigation of the Moderated Mediation Effects |
| Yu Hao1,Liu Wenhao1,Chen Chong2 |
| （1.School of Management, Zhejiang University of Technology;2.School of Information Engineering, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China） |
|
|
|
|
Abstract In a highly uncertain external environment, improving innovation capability has become an important strategic direction for high-tech enterprises to enhance their competitiveness. Existing studies on different cognitive dimensions related to decision making, behavior or performance, ignoring the thinking of the executive team on the external dynamic environment. From a cognitive perspective, this study explores the mediating role of dynamic competence between executive team cognitive interaction and high-tech enterprise innovation performance, the role of environmental dynamics in regulating dynamic capabilities and innovation performance, and environmental dynamics. The regulatory effect of the above mediating effects. Taking 335 IT companies in the Yangtze River Delta as a sample, the research found that: (1) executive team cognitive interaction has a positive impact on innovation performance; (2) dynamic ability has between executive team cognitive interaction and innovation performance Intermediary role; (3) Environmental dynamics has a positive adjustment between dynamic capabilities and innovation performance; (4) Environmental dynamics strengthens the above mediating role. The conclusions of the study have theoretical significance and practical enlightenment for Chinese high-tech enterprises to enhance team innovation ability.
|
|
Received: 27 December 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] 武亚军. “战略框架式思考”、“悖论整合”与企业竞争优势——任正非的认知模式分析及管理启示[J]. 管理世界, 2013,29(4):150-167.[2] ZHENG Y. Unlocking founding team prior shared experience: a transactive memory system perspective[J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2012, 27(5):577-591.[3] HEAVEY C, SIMSEK Z. Transactive memory systems and firm performance: an upper echelons perspective[J]. Organization Science, 2015, 26(4):941-959.[4] DANIEL G B, RYAN G. A dual-process contingency model of leadership, transactive memory systems and team performance[J].2019,96:297-308.[5] HEAVEY C, SIMSEK Z. Transactive memory systems and firm performance: an upper echelons perspective[J]. Organization Science, 2015, 26(4):941-959.[6] ARGOTE L, GUO J M. Routines and transactive memory systems: creating, coordinating, retaining, and transferring knowledge in organizations[J]. Research in Organizational Behavior, 2016, (36):65-84.[7] MILLER K D, PENTLAND B T, SEUNGHO CHOI. Dynamics of Performing and Remembering Organizational Routines[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2012, 49(8):1536-1558.[8] ISENBERG D J. The big idea: how to start an entrepreneurial revolution[J]. Harvard Business Review, 2010, 88(6):40-50.[9] 尚航标, 黄培伦. 管理认知与动态环境下企业竞争优势万和集团案例研究[J]. 南开管理评论, 2010, 13(3):70-79.[10] 于晓宇, 席瑞, 陈依, 等. 交互记忆系统与产品创新性:创业拼凑的中介作用[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2019, 40(3):83-98.[11] MELL J N, VAN K D, VAN G. The catalyst effect: the impact of transactive memory system structure on team performance[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2014, 57(4):1154-1173.[12] LEWIS K, HERNDON B. Transactive memory systems: Current issues and future research directions [J]. Organization Science, 2011, 22(5):1254-1265.[13] LIAO J, JIMMIESON N L, O'BRIEN A T. Developing transactive memory systems: theoretical contributions from a social identity perspective[J]. Group & Organization Management, 2012, 37(2):204-240.[14] 林筠, 王蒙. 交互记忆系统对团队探索式学习和利用式学习的影响: 以团队反思为中介[J]. 管理评论, 2014, 26(6):143-150+176.[15] 卢启程, 梁琳琳, 贾非. 战略学习如何影响组织创新——基于动态能力的视角[J]. 管理世界, 2018,34(9):109-129.[16] 董保宝, 葛宝山, 王侃. 资源整合过程、动态能力与竞争优势:机理与路径[J]. 管理世界, 2011，27(3):92-101.[17] REN Y, ARGOTE L. Transactive memory systems 1985-2010: an integrative framework of dimensions, antecedents and consequences[J]. Academy of Management Annals, 2011, 5(1):189-230.[18] 屈晓倩, 刘新梅. 信息型团队断裂与团队创造力关系的实证研究——交互记忆系统的中介作用[J]. 研究与发展管理, 2016 (1):52-61.[19] ARGOTE L, REN Y. Transactive memory systems: a microfoundation of dynamic capabilities[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2012, 49(8):1375-1382.[20] WU L. Applicability of the resource - based and dynamic capability views under environmental volatility[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2010, 63(1):27-31.[21] 李晓宇, 陈国卿. 信息技术投入、技术创新动态能力与企业绩效关系研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2019, 36(16):100-107.[22] 马文聪, 朱桂龙. 环境动态性对技术创新和绩效关系的调节作用[J]. 科学学研究, 2011, 29(3):454-460.[23] 简兆权, 王晨, 陈键宏. 战略导向、动态能力与技术创新:环境不确定性的调节作用[J]. 研究与发展管理, 2015, 27(2):65-76.[24] 何一清, 崔连广, 张敬伟. 互动导向对创新过程的影响——创新能力的中介作用与资源拼凑的调节作用[J]. 南开管理评论, 2015, 18(4):96-105.[25] CHEN X G, LI X, CLARK J G, et al. Knowledge sharing in open source software project teams: a transactive memory system perspective [J]. International Journal of Information Management, 2013 (33):553-563.[26] LAVIE D, STETTNER U, TUSHMAN M L. Exploration and exploitation within and across organizations[J]. Academy of Management annals, 2010, 4(1):109-155.[27] 冯鹤鸣. 高管团队认知、政治关联与纵向一体化关系的研究[D]. 广州：华南理工大学, 2018.[28] 黄海艳, 武蓓. 交互记忆系统、动态能力与创新绩效关系研究[J]. 科研管理,2016, 37(4):68-76.[29] HAIR J F, ANDERSON R E, TATHAM R L, et al. Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.) [M]. Prentice Hall,1998: 648-650.[30] PREACHER K J, HAYES A F. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models[J]. Behavour Research Methods, 2008, 40(3):879-891.[31] 陈晓刚, 李雪, 崔颖安. 交互记忆系统对知识分享的影响机制研究—基于开源软件团队的检验[J]. 科研管理,2014,35(6): 145-153.[32] WANG Y-Y, HUANG Q, DAVISON R M. Effect of transactive memory systems on team performance mediated by knowledge transfer[J]. International Journal of Information Management, 2018, 41:65-79.[33] 蔡俊亚, 党兴华. 交互记忆系统对团队绩效的影响机制研究——基于团队反思的中介效应和团队学习的调节效应[J]. 预测, 2015, 34(05):28-33.[34] 吕逸婧, 陈守明, 邵婉玲. 高管团队交互记忆系统与组织绩效:战略柔性的中介作用[J]. 南开管理评论, 2018, 21(1):216-224.[35] 史丽萍, 杜泽文, 刘强. 交互记忆系统对知识团队绩效作用机制研究——以知识整合为中介变量[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2013, 30(8):132-137.[36] 李随成, 武梦超. 供应商整合能力对渐进式创新与突破式创新的影响——基于环境动态性的调节作用[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2016, 33(3):96-102.[37] 陆亚东. 中国管理学理论研究的窘境与未来[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2015(3):3-15.[38] 岳金桂, 于叶. 技术创新动态能力与技术商业化绩效关系研究——环境动态性的调节作用[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2019, 36(10):91-98.[39] 王涛, 张雁, 李姝. 管理认知对企业能力构建的影响[J]. 经济管理, 2012(3):179-188.[40] 吕洁, 张钢. 团队认知的涌现：基于集体信息加工的视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2013 (12):2214-2223.[41] 高洋, 葛宝山, 蒋大可. 组织学习、惯例更新与竞争优势之间的关系——基于不同环境不确定水平的研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2017，36(9):1386-1395.[42] WILHELM H, SCHLMER M, MAURER I. How dynamic capabilities affect the effectiveness and efficiency of operating routines under high and low levels of environmental dynamism[J]. British Journal of Management, 2015, 26(2):327-345. |
|
|
|
