|
|
|
| Consumption Structure Upgrading,Government Support and Technological Innovation Ability: An Analysis from a Space Perspective |
| Chan Jian1,Xu Zhengzhong2 |
| （1.Graduate School of the Party School of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China (National Academy of Governance)；2.Department of Economics Research of the Party School of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China (National Academy of Governance)),Beijing 100000,China） |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Based on 2009-2017 China's provincial spatial panel data,this paper focuses on analyzing the multiple relationships between consumption structure upgrading,government support,and scientific and technological innovation capabilities through the use of the spatial Dubin model. The research finds that: (1) At present,there is a U-shaped relationship between the consumption structure upgrading and regional scientific and technological innovation capabilities.,That is,when the consumption structure is at a lower stage,it has a negative correlation with the improvement of scientific and technological innovation capabilities,and when the consumption structure is upgraded to a certain height,this negative relationship turns into a positive connection. (2) Government support has an inverted U-shaped relationship with scientific and technological innovation capabilities. That is,when the level of scientific and technological innovation capabilities is low,government support is conducive to the promotion of scientific and technological innovation capabilities. When scientific and technological innovation capabilities have developed to a certain extent,government support has become a limiting factor. We believe that the inverted U-shaped curve presented by government support is closely related to the gradual changes in consumption orientation,that is,when the consumption structure is at a lower stage,government support has played a role in making up for market deficiencies. When the consumer market turns to be conducive to innovation and development,excessive government support will have a " Crowding-out Effect" on the free market,which is not conducive to the development of innovation capabilities. (3) On space overflow,the geographic distance matrix shows a similar relationship with discovery (1) and discovery (2),and the economic distance matrix shows a similar relationship with discovery (2).
|
|
Received: 04 June 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] 张平,文启湘.技术创新、消费创新与消费制度[J].求索,2009(3):83-85.[2] 关士续.基于消费动因的技术创新研究[J].中国软科学,2001(5):106-109.[3] 吴先慧,吴海燕,陆强,等.我国区域创新体系的影响因素实证研究——以深圳为例[J].科技进步与对策,2011,28(7):26-31.[4] 刘和东.中国区域研发效率及其影响因素研究——基于随机前沿函数的实证分析[J].科学学研究,2011,29(4):548-556.[5] CHI W,QIAN X. The role of education in regional innovation activities :spatial evidence from China[J]. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy,2010,15(4):396-419.[6] 蒋天颖.我国区域创新差异时空格局演化及其影响因素分析[J].经济地理,2013,33(6):22-29.[7] 尹世杰.消费需求与经济增长[J].消费经济,2004(5):3-7.[8] 焦帅涛,孙秋碧.技术创新与消费升级对经济增长溢出效应的实证分析[J].统计与信息论坛,2020,35(4):74-81.[9] PYKA A,ANDERSEN E S. Long term economic development :technological regimes and demand structure in the evolution of the pharmaceutical industry[EB/OL]. 2013,10.1007/978-3-642-35125-9(Chapter 4):61-94.[10] 余红心,赵袁军,李思远.居民消费结构升级对产业结构升级的影响研究——基于供需失衡的调节效应[J].江汉学术,2020,39(2):29-37.[11] 李尚骜,龚六堂.非一致性偏好、内生偏好结构与经济结构变迁[J].经济研究,2012,47(7):35-47.[12] 张颖熙,夏杰长.以服务消费引领消费结构升级:国际经验与中国选择[J].北京工商大学学报(社会科学版),2017,32(6):104-112.[13] 汤向俊,任保平.投资消费结构转变与经济增长方式转型[J].经济科学,2010(6):30-41.[14] 金晓彤,黄蕊.技术进步与消费需求的互动机制研究——基于供给侧改革视域下的要素配置分析[J].经济学家,2017(2):50-57.[15] 曹前有.消费动力视野中的技术创新[J].自然辩证法研究,2008,24(12):52-57.[16] JOSEF ZWEIMLLER,BRUNNER J K . Innovation and growth with rich and poor consumers[J]. Metroeconomica,2005,56:1.[17] 谢小平.消费结构升级与技术进步[J].南方经济,2018(7):19-38.[18] BUERA F J,KABOSKI J P. Can traditional theories of structural change fit the data[J]. Journal of the European Economic Association,2016(2-3):2-3.[19] 唐广炬,陈兵.消费创新的探讨[J].经济与社会发展,2004(10):46-49.[20] 李子联,朱江丽.收入分配与自主创新:一个消费需求的视角[J].科学学研究,2014,32(12):1897-1908.[21] 埃里克·冯·希普尔.技术创新的源泉[M].北京：科学技术文献出版社,1997.[22] 梁军,周晓杰,张谱.生态文明导向消费结构与产业生态化研究[J].上海经济,2015(6):39-43.[23] 邓线平.消费促进技术进步的成因及途径分析[J].科学技术与辩证法,2006(1):78-81+111.[24] ACEMOGLU DARON,LINN JOSHUA. Market size in innovation: theory and evidence from the pharmaceutical industry[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics,119(3):1049-1090.[25] 尹世杰.消费经济学[M].北京;高等教育出版社,2007:774-775.[26] 王辉龙,高波.住房消费与消费结构升级——理论假说与实证检验[J].财经科学,2016(1):100-110.[27] 叶祥松,刘敬.政府支持、技术市场发展与科技创新效率[J].经济学动态,2018(7):67-81.[28] 郑琼洁.政府科技激励与技术创新效率研究——基于行业要素禀赋的分析视角[J].南方经济,2014(12):66-81.[29] GOOLSBEE A.Does government R&D policy mainly benefit scientists and engineers[J]. American Economic Review,1998,88(2): 298-302.[30] 肖文,林高榜.政府支持、研发管理与技术创新效率——基于中国工业行业的实证分析[J].管理世界,2014(4):71-80.[31] 范允奇,李晓钟.政府R&D投入、空间外溢与我国高技术产业技术创新效率[J].工业技术经济,2014,33(5):101-107.[32] 朱辉.我国省域科技创新水平的空间分布评价[J].东南大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2015,17(S2):63-64+80.[33] 刘耀彬,王启仿,宋学锋.转型时期中国区域技术创新能力评价与分析[J].科技进步与对策,2004(9):13-15.[34] 朱辉.我国省域科技创新水平的空间分布评价[J].东南大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2015,17(S2):63-64+80.[35] 杨丽,孙之淳.基于熵值法的西部新型城镇化发展水平测评[J].经济问题,2015(3):115-119.[36] JAMES LESAGE,ROBERT KELLEY PACE.Introduction to spatial econometrics[M].S.L.:CRC Press,2009.[37] 贺晓宇,沈坤荣.现代化经济体系、全要素生产率与高质量发展[J].上海经济研究,2018(6):25-34.[38] 文启湘,冉净斐.消费结构与产业结构的和谐:和谐性及其测度[J].中国工业经济,2005(8):14-19+104.[39] 孙皓,胡鞍钢.城乡居民消费结构升级的消费增长效应分析[J].财政研究,2013(7):56-62.[40] 陈冲,吴炜聪.消费结构升级与经济高质量发展:驱动机理与实证检验[J].上海经济研究,2019(6):59-71.[41] 王平,王琴梅.消费金融驱动城镇居民消费升级研究——基于结构与质的多重响应[J].南京审计大学学报,2018,15(2):69-77.[42] 杨明海,张红霞,孙亚男,等.中国八大综合经济区科技创新能力的区域差距及其影响因素研究[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2018,35(4):3-19. [43] 李翔,邓峰.科技创新、产业结构升级与经济增长[J].科研管理,2019,40(3):84-93. [44] 李婧,谭清美,白俊红.中国区域创新生产的空间计量分析——基于静态与动态空间面板模型的实证研究[J].管理世界,2010(7):43-55+65. |
|
|
|
