|
|
|
| Research on Authorization of Artificial Intelligence Participating in Invention |
| Li Xiang |
| (School of Intellectual Property,East China University of Political Science and Law, Shanghai 200042, China) |
|
|
|
|
Abstract In the current era of weak artificial intelligence, discussing the issue of artificial intelligence participating in invention should focus on the current human-computer interaction (human-machine collaboration) model, which is divided into two types. The first is the use of AI as a creative tool to accomplish patented technologies in other fields, and the second is the invention itself that contains ai technical solutions. The authorization of artificial intelligence to participate in invention mainly includes subject judgment, object review and evaluation of authorization conditions. The study found that, first, in terms of subject judgment, the prior advantage path has a high degree of practical fit, which is more in line with the construction of a people-oriented legal system. Second, the object review of artificial intelligence participating in inventions should focus on preventing the object attribute dilemma of intelligent algorithms and the conflict of artificial intelligence technology on ethics. Third, the practicability, novelty, and creative judgment of artificial intelligence participation in inventions need to be based on the principles of patent law examination, combined with the characteristics of artificial intelligence technology, to give the examination subject, examination points and other new connotations. The research results highlight the impact of artificial intelligence technology on the existing patent system, which is conducive to optimizing patent examination and management.
|
|
Received: 20 December 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] 国务院发展研究中心.我国人工智能发展的现状、问题与促进政策[EB/OL].[2019-08-01].http://www.drc.gov.cn/n/20190708/1-224-2898894.htm.[2] 中华人民共和国国务院新闻办公室.新一代人工智能具有五大特点[EB/OL].[2019-08-08].http://www.scio.gov.cn/32344/32345/35889/36946/zy36950/Document/1559026/1559026.htm.[3] 刘强,周奕澄.人工智能发明专利审查标准研究[J].净月学刊,2018(3):76-78.[4] 一种机器人[P].专利申请人：深圳科卫机器人服务有限公司.专利申请号:2018115750136. [5] 刁舜.人工智能自主发明物专利保护模式论考[J].科技进步与对策,2018，35(21):121-123.[6] KALIN HRISTOV. Artificial intelligence and the copyright dilemma[J].The IP Law Review,2017(3)：445-446.[7] 曹建峰,祝林华.人工智能对专利制度的影响初探[J].中国发明与专利,2018(6):54.[8] 崔国斌.知识产权法官造法批判[J].中国法学,2006(1):158-162.[9] 王瀚.欧美人工智能专利保护比较研究[J].华东理工大学学报(社会科学版),2018(1):99.[10] 李宗辉.人工智能专利授权的理论争议与实践发展[J].河南财经政法大学学报,2018(6):155-157.[11] 闫坤如.人工智能的道德风险及其规避路径[J].上海师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2018(2):43-45.[12] 蓝江.人工智能的伦理挑战[EB/OL].[2019-08-06].http://theory.people.com.cn/n1/2019/0401/c40531-31005609.html.[13] The malicious use of artificial intelligence:forecasting, prevention, and mitigation[EB/OL].[2019-08-20]. https://www.innovation4.cn/library/r31346. [14] 崔国斌.基因技术的专利保护与利益分享.知识产权文丛[A].郑成思.知识产权文丛[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2000:290.[15] 吴汉东.知识产权法:第五版[M].北京:法律出版社,2014:180.[16] BEN HATTENBACH,JOSHUA GLUCOFT.Patents in an era of infinite monkeys and artificial intelligence[J].STAN. TECH. L. REV，2015(2):38-43.[17] RYAN ABBOTT.I think，therefore I invent: creative computers and the future of patent law[J].B.C.L. REV.2016(57):1118．[18] 崔国斌.专利法原理与案例:第二版[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2016:190.[19] 搜狐网.日本特许厅引入人工智能技术优化专利审查和管理[EB/OL].[2019-08-19].http://www.sohu.com/a/191136816_698253.[20] 崔国斌.专利技术的等同比较[A].郑胜利.北大知识产权评论[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2002:46.[21] 陈绍玲,梁翔蓝.人工智能对专利创造性的挑战及应对[J].福建江夏学院学报,2018(4):32-34.[22] RYAN ABBOTT.Everything is obvious[EB/OL].[2019-08-25].https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3056915.[23] 崔国斌.专利法原理与案例:第二版[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2016:278.[24] MARTIN J ADELMAN,RANDALL R RADER,JOHN R THOMAS,et al.Cases and materials on patent law [M].Second Edition,Thomson West,2003:368. |
|
|
|
