|
|
|
| The Mechanism of Perceived Insider Status on Turnover Intention and Innovative Behavior of Military Industry R&D Personnel: the Joint Effect of Proactive Personality and Organizational Career Management |
| Zhang Jianwei1,Zhou Jie2,Li Haihong1,Xuan Xingyu1 |
| （1.School of Humanities and Social Science, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China;2.Sichuan Police College, Luzhou 646000, China） |
|
|
|
|
Abstract "Insider" is a kind of traditional and informal division of identity that generally exists in military industry enterprises.The rich resources that contained in this special status have an important impact on military industry R&D personnel's working attitude and behavior.Based on the conservation of resources theory, we examine the process mechanism and multiple interaction effects of perceived insider status on its turnover intention and innovative behavior.A questionnaire survey for 712 R&D personnel and the results show that: ①perceived insider status predicts turnover intention negatively and innovative behavior positively, and working calling partially mediates the above relationship；②proactive personality positively moderates effect of working calling on turnover intention and innovative behavior；③the three interactions of working calling, proactive personality and organizational career management on turnover intention and innovative behavior are significant respectively.When proactive personality is high and organizational career management is low, the negative relationship of working calling and turnover intention is stronger.When both are low, the positive relationship of working calling and innovative behavior is stronger.
|
|
Received: 02 August 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] 张建卫, 周洁, 李正锋, 等.组织职业生涯管理何以影响军工研发人员的创新行为——自我决定与特质激活理论整合视角[J].预测, 2019, 38(2): 9-16.[2] STAMPER C L, MASTERSON S S.Insider or outsider? how employee perceptions of insider status affect their work behavior[J].Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2002, 23(8): 875-894.[3] WANG J, KIM T.Proactive socialization behavior in China: the mediating role of perceived insider status and the moderating role of supervisors' traditionality[J].Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2013, 34(3): 389-406.[4] DOBROW S R, TOSTIKHARAS J.Calling: the development of a scale measure[J].Personnel Psychology, 2011, 64(4): 1001-1049.[5] BARNETTA R C, BRENNAB R T, GAREISC K C, et al.Conservation of resources theory in the context of multiple roles: an analysis of within-and cross-role mediational pathways[J].Community, Work & Family, 2012, 15(2): 103-148.[6] 韩雪, 厉杰.我的职业我做主: 使命感对职业生涯自我管理的影响研究[J].中国人力资源开发, 2018, 5(9): 6-15.[7] BIBI A, JADOON B.The mediating effect of exploitative and explorative learning on the relationship between job embeddedness and innovative work behavior[J].Science Journal of Business and Management, 2018, 6(1): 1-8.[8] TETT R P, GUTERMAN H A.Situation trait relevance, trait expression, and cross-situational consistency: testing a principle of trait activation[J].Journal of Research in Personality, 2000, 34(4): 397-423.[9] HOBFOLL S E, HALBESLEBEN J, NEVEU J P, et al.Conservation of resources in the organizational context: the reality of resources and their consequences[J].Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2018, 5(1): 103-128.[10] GONG Y, CHEUNG S Y, WANG M, et al.Unfolding the proactive process for creativity: integration of the employee proactivity, information exchange, and psychological safety perspectives[J].Journal of Management, 2012, 38(5): 1611-1633.[11] 逄键涛,温珂.主动性人格、工作满意度与员工创新行为——对中国医药生物技术企业的实证分析[J].科学学研究, 2016, 34(1): 151-160.[12] CHEN Z X, ARYEE S.Delegation and employee work outcomes: an examination of the cultural context of mediating processes in China[J].The Academy of Management Journal, 2007, 50(1): 226-238.〖LM〗[13] 李燕萍, 郑馨怡, 刘宗华.基于资源保存理论的内部人身份感知对员工建言行为的影响机制研究[J].管理学报, 2017, 14(1): 196-204.[14] 吴津坤, 刘善仕, 王红丽, 等.“真有之情”与“应有之情”: 内部人身份感知对员工创新行为的双重影响机制[J].商业经济与管理, 2016, 297(7): 64-72.[15] RANDEL A E, GALVIN B M, SHORE L M, et al.Inclusive leadership: realizing positive outcomes through belongingness and being valued for uniqueness[J].Human Resource Management Review, 2018, 28(2): 190-203.[16] NG T W H, FELDMAN D C.The impact of job embeddedness on innovation-related behaviors[J].Human Resource Management, 2010, 49(6): 1067-1087.[17] KIAZAD K, HOLTOM B C, HOM P W, et al.Job embeddedness: a multifoci theoretical extension[J].Journal of Applied Psychology, 2015, 100(3): 641-659.[18] 刘云, 石金涛.组织创新气氛与激励偏好对员工创新行为的交互效应研究[J].管理世界, 2009(10): 88-102.[19] ZHAO H, KESSEL M, KRATZER J.Supervisor-subordinate relationship, differentiation, and employee creativity: a self-categorization perspective[J].The Journal of Creative Behavior, 2014, 48(3): 165-184.[20] PENNY L M, HUNTER E M, PEYYY S J.Personality and counterproductive work behavior: using conservation of resources theory to narrow the profile of deviant employees[J].Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 2011, 81(1): 58-77.[21] FREDRICKSON B L, LOSADA M F.Positive affect and the complex dynamics of human flourishing [J].American Psychologist, 2005, 60(7): 678-686.[22] BATEMAN T S, CRANT J M.The proactive component of organizational behavior: a measure and correlates[J].Journal of Organizational Behavior, 1993, 14(2): 103-118.[23] 裴宇晶，赵曙明.知识型员工职业召唤、职业承诺与工作态度关系研究[J].管理科学, 2015(2):103-114.[24] CUBEL M, NUEVO-CHIQUERO A, SANCHEZ-PAGES, et al.Do personality traits affect productivity? evidence from the laboratory[J].Economic Journal, 2016, 126(592): 654-681.[25] 龙立荣, 方俐洛, 凌文辁.组织职业生涯管理与员工心理与行为的关系[J].心理学报, 2002, 34(1): 97-105.[26] 周洁, 张建卫, 李海红, 等.军工研发人员生涯适应力对其创新行为、离职意向的作用机制: 一个整合性过程模型[J].科技进步与对策, 2019, 36(9): 133-142.[27] 郝东梅, 赵煜, 朱焕卿.组织职业生涯管理与员工离职意向: 情感承诺的中介作用[J].兰州大学学报(社会科学版), 2016, 44(1): 171-178.[28] YANG K J, YAN X F, FAN J Y, et al.Leader-follower congruence in proactive personality and work engagement: a polynomial regression analysis[J].Personality & Individual Differences, 2017, 105: 43-46.[29] WENG Q X, MCELROY J C.Organizational career growth, affective occupational commitment and turnover intentions[J].Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2012, 80(2): 256-265.[30] WILSON K S, SIN H P, CONLON D E.What about the leader in leader-member exchange? the impact of resource exchanges and substitutability on the leader[J].Academy of Management Review, 2010, 35(3): 358-372.[31] COOPER W H, WITHEY M J.The strong situation hypothesis[J].Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2009, 13(1): 62-72.[32] 周霞, 李铁城.职业召唤能否带来员工的创新？知识型员工职业召唤对创新行为的影响——组织支持的调节作用[J].科技管理研究, 2018, 38(23): 123-130.[33] BUUNK B P, SCHARFELI W B.Reciprocity in interpersonal relationships: an evolutionary perspective on its importance for health and well-being[J].European Review of Social Psychology, 1999, 10(1): 259-291.[34] 陆欣欣, 孙嘉卿.领导—成员交换与情绪枯竭: 互惠信念和权利距离导向的作用[J].心理学报, 2016, 48(5): 566-577.[35] CHAN D.Interactive effects of situational judgment effectiveness and proactive personality on work perceptions and work outcomes[J].Journal of Applied Psychology, 2006, 91(2): 475-481.[36] 胡青, 王胜男, 张兴伟, 等.工作中的主动性行为的回顾与展望[J].心理科学进展, 2011, 19(10): 1534-1543.[37] SONG D R, LIU H F, GU J B, et al.Collectivism and employees' innovative behavior: the mediating role of team identification and the moderating role of leader-member exchange[J].Creativity & Innovation Management, 2018, 27(2): 221-231.[38] KONVSKY M A, CROPANZANO R.Perceived fairness of employee drug testing as a predictor of employee attitudes and job performance[J].Journal of Applied Psychology, 1991, 76(5): 698-707.[39] YUGO J E.The effect of response format on the criterion related validity of a measure of work orientation[D].Graduate College of Bowling Green State University, 2006.[40] 商佳音, 甘怡群.主动性人格对大学毕业生职业决策自我效能的影响[J].北京大学学报（自然科学版）, 2009, 45(3): 548-554.[41] 赵红丹, 汤先平.内部人身份认知研究述评[J].外国经济与管理, 2015, 37(4): 56-65. |
|
|
|
