|
|
Employee Ownership, Information Transparency and Enterprise Innovation |
Huang Pingping,Jiao Yuehua |
(School of Accounting,Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan 430073,China) |
|
|
Abstract Since the China securities regulatory commission relaunched the ESOP in June 2014, more than 8% of listed companies have launched ESOP plans. This paper takes the A-share listed companies from 2010 to 2017 as the research sample, and based on the research framework of DID at multiple time points, it is used to control the existing endogenous problems. This paper empirically tests the impact of ESOP on the innovation activities of enterprises, so as to reveal the real effect of ESOP under the background of China's mixed-ownership reform. The empirical study found that enterprises with ESOP have higher innovation output than those without ESOP. And the promotion effect is more significant in enterprises with higher information transparency; Compared with state-owned enterprises, the implementation of ESOP in non-state-owned enterprises plays a stronger role in promoting innovation activities. Further analysis shows that, by testing the mechanism through the intermediary effect, the implementation of ESOP can improve the innovation willingness of the management and thus promote the innovation input, while the subscription of ESOP shares from employees' own funds will hinder the enterprise from carrying out innovation activities. The research of this paper reveals the possible mechanism of the influence of ESOP on enterprise innovation activities, and provides some enlightenment for investors to understand the role of ESOP in corporate governance.
|
Received: 12 August 2019
|
|
|
|
|
[1] ARMSTRONG C S, VASHISHTHA R. Executive stock options, differential risk-taking incentives, and firm value[J]. Journal of Financial Economics,2012,104(1):70-88.[2] 田轩, 孟清扬. 股权激励计划能促进企业创新吗[J]. 南开管理评论, 2018, 21(3): 176-190.[3] CHANG X, FU K, LOW A, et al. Non-executive employee stock options and corporate innovation[J]. Journal of Financial Economics,2015,115(1):168-188.[4] 陈效东.谁才是企业创新的真正主体:高管人员还是核心员工[J].财贸经济,2017(12):127-144.[5] 黄萍萍,焦跃华,张东旭.员工持股计划与企业创新[J].华东经济管理,2019,33(5):1-9.[6] TSANG A,WANG T K, ZHU NZ. Corporategovernance reforms around the world: the impact on firm innovation[J]. Working Paper:York University, 2019.[7] CORE J E, GUAY W R. Stock option plans for non-executive employees[J].Journal of Financial Economics,2001,61(2):253-287.[8] 陈艳艳.员工股权激励的实施动机与经济后果研究[J].管理评论,2015(5):123-129.[9] OYER P, SCHAEFER S. Why do some firms give stock options to all employees?:an empirical examination of alternative theories[J].Journal of Financial Economics,2005,76(1):99-133.[10] 赵渊.上市公司员工持股计划之优劣评析——以人力资本输入为视角[J].法制与社会,2013(1):196-206.[11] WEITZMAN M, KRUSE D. Profit sharing and productivity[M].Washington:Brookings Institution Press,1990:95-142.[12] 王砾,代昀昊,孔东民. 激励相容:上市公司员工持股计划的公告效应[J].经济学动态,2017(2):37-50.[13] 黄淑和. 贯彻三中全会精神深化国资国企改革[J].国企,2014(1):22-24.[14] 于雅萍,姜英兵.员工股权激励与内部控制质量[J].审计与经济研究,2019(2):54-65.[15] JONES D C, KATO T. The productivity effects of employee stock-ownership plans and bonuses: evidence from japanese panel data[J]. American Economic Review,1995,85(3):391-414.[16] KIM E H, OUIME P. Broad-based employee stock ownership: motives and outcomes[J]. The Journal of Finance,2014,69(3):1273-1319.[17] 章卫东,罗国民,陶媛媛.上市公司员工持股计划的股东财富效应研究——来自我国证券市场的经验数据[J].北京工商大学学报:社会科学版,2016,31(2):61-70.[18] KANDEL E, LAZEAR E P. Peer pressure and partnership[J]. Journal of Political Economy,1992,100(4):801-817. [19] MARIANNA M, LANE P J, GOMEZ—MEJIA L R. CEO incentives, innovation and performance in technology-intensive firms: a reconciliation outcome and behavior-based incentive schemes[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2006,27(11):1057-1080.[20] 陈华东.管理者任期、股权激励与企业创新研究[J].中国软科学,2016(8):112-126.[21] 翟胜宝,陈紫薇.高管股权激励与企业创新[J].北京工商大学学报,2016,31(1):85-93.[22] 姜英兵,于雅萍.谁是更直接的创新者?——核心员工股权激励与企业创新[J].经济管理,2017,39(3):109-127.[23] HOLMSTROM B. Agency costs and innovation[J]. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 1989, 12(3):305-327.[24] HALL BH. The financing of research and development[J]. Oxford Review of Economic Policy,2002(18):35-51.[25] HIRSHLEIFER D. Managerialreputation and corporate investment decision[J].Financial Management,1993,22(2):145-160.[26] KAPLAN S N, MINTON B A. How has CEO turnover changed[J]. International Review of Finance,2012(12): 57-87.[27] MANSO G. Motivating innovation[J]. The Journal of Finance,2011(66):1823-1860.[28] AGHION P, VAN R, ZINGALES L. Innovation and institution ownership[J].Amercian Economic Review,2013(1):277-304.[29] BUSHMAN R M, SMITH A J. Financial accounting information and corporate governance[J].Journal of Accounting and Economics,2001(32)32: 237-333.[30] NAGAR V, NANDA D, WYSOCKI P. Discretionary disclosure and stock-based incentives[J]. Journal of Accounting and Economics,2003, 34(3):280-309.[31] BOVA F, DOU Y, HOPE, et al. Employee ownership and firm disclosure[J]. Contemporary Accounting Research, 2015, 32(2):639-673.[32] JENSEN M C, MECKLING W H. Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure[J].Journal of Financial Economics,1976,3(4):305-360.[33] 付强,扈文秀,康华. 股权激励能提高上市公司信息透明度吗?——基于未来盈余反应系数的分析[J].经济管理,2019(3):174-189.[34] 黎文靖,郑曼妮.实质性创新还是策略性创新——宏观产业政策对微观企业创新的影响[J].经济研究,2016(4):60-73.[35] TIAN X, WANG T Y. Tolerance for failure and corporate innovation[J].Review of Financial Studies,2014,27(1):211-255.[36] 褚剑,秦璇,方军雄. 中国式融资融券制度安排与分析师盈利预测乐观偏差[J].管理世界,2019(1):151-164.[37] 魏志华,赵悦如,吴育辉. 财政补贴:“馅饼”还是“陷阱”——基于融资约束VS.过度投资视角的实证研究[J].财政研究,2015(12):18-29.[38] 杨国超, 刘静, 廉鹏, 等. 减税激励、研发操纵与研发绩效[J].经济研究,2017(8):112-126.[39] 谢德仁,林乐. 管理层语调能预示公司未来业绩吗——基于我国上市公司年度业绩说明会的文本分析[J]. 会计研究, 2015(2):20-27.[40] LOUGHRAN T, MCDONALD B. When is a liability not a liability textual analysis,dictionaries,and 10-Ks[J].Journal of Finance,2011,66(1):35-65.[41] 温忠麟,张雷,侯杰泰,等. 中介效应检验程序及其应用[J].心理学报,2004,36(5):614-620.[42] 李四海,江新峰,宋献中. 高管年龄与薪酬激励:理论路径与经验证据[J].中国工业经济,2015(5):122-134. |
|
|
|