|
|
|
| Reflection and Reconstruction of Legal Regulation of Abnormal Patent Application |
| Tang Daisheng1,2 |
| （1.School of Intellectual Property, NanJing University of Science & Technology, Nanjing 210094,China;2. School of Law, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China） |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Abnormal patent application should be mainly responsible for low-quality patents and seriously hinder competition and innovation. Because of this, the government has carried out administrative measures to impose restrictions on these behaviors, but the regulation is limited in terms of supervising abnormal patent application more effectively. Copyright infringement disputes caused by abnormal patent application documents indicate that if patent documents are vested with copyright, then there will be legal control over the quality of patents. The legal regulation can be introduced to control abnormal patent application brought by plagiarizing and counterfeiting patent documents of others. As a consequence, it is expected to be complementary to administrative regulation and thus binary regulation model could be achieved. Moreover, Meanwhile, legislation reconstruction of two regulatory models legitimizes the legal regulation of abnormal patent application.
|
|
Received: 27 May 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] ERIC WARNER.Patenting and innovation in China: incentives, policy, and outcomes[J]. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2015. [2] 董涛,贺慧.中国专利质量报告——实用新型与外观设计专利制度实施情况研究[J].科技与法律,2015(2):220-304.[3] 毛昊.中国专利质量提升之路：时代挑战与制度思考[J].知识产权,2018(3):61-71.[4] 酆迅著.电学专利申请文件的撰写[M].北京：知识产权出版社，2007:17.[5] 刘超.中共国家知识产权局党组召开专题会议,研究部署进一步提高专利质量工作[N].知识产权报,http://www.cnipa.gov.cn/zscqgz/1133855.htm,2019-04-21.[6] 张维.国家知识产权局发出18份惩戒决定书治理专利代理非正常申请行为[N].法制日报,2019-4-13,http://politics.people.com.cn/n1/2019/0413/c1001-31027954.html?form=rect,2019-4-21.[7] 朱雪忠.我国专利数量的失控及其危害[EB/OL].2018-01-15.http://www.nsfc.gov.cn/csc/20340/20289/20805/index.html,2019-04-21.[8] DAN PRUD'HOMME. Dulling the cutting-edge: how patent related policies and practices hamper innovation in china，european union chamber of commerce in china publications, august 2012[EB/OL].https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm abstract_id=2190293,2019-4-21.[9] 徐棣枫.问题专利探析[J].东南大学学报：哲学社会科学版，2007(4):54-59.[10] 石必胜.专利创造性判断研究[M].北京：知识产权出版社，2012:76-77.[11] 杨晔隽.“垃圾专利”形成原因与对策研究[D].南京:南京大学,2006.[12] 李扬.知识产权法基本原理（II）——著作权法[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2013:84.[13] 毛祖开.专利说明书的“可著作权性”分析[J].科技与法律,2012(2):31-33.[14] JULIE E，COHEN. Copyright in a global information economy[M]. Citic Publishing House, 2003: 90.[15] 梁志文.专利质量的司法控制[J].法学家,2014(3):61-73.[16] 崔国斌.知识产权确权模式选择理论[J].中外法学,2014(2):408-430.[17] 徐棣枫.不正当行为抗辩制度之移植可行性及设计构想——基于《专利法》第四次修改中的“诚实信用原则”[J].东方法学,2018(6):28-36.[18] 郭鹏鹏.专利说明书著作权问题研究[J].中国版权,2016(5):47-51. |
|
|
|
