|
|
|
| Entrepreneurial Team Collaboration Clusters Complexity and Identify the Key Interface |
| Xu Chenglei,Wang Ding,Duan Wanchun |
| School of Management & Economics，Kunming University of Science and Technology，Kunming 650093,China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract In order to response the interface collaborative emergent properties analysis and management requirements that the multi-team entrepreneurial process in complex scenarios,think about the "entrepreneurial innovation interaction" characteristics of entrepreneurial team,the paper illustrated the interface structure of implementing entrepreneurial teams clusters collaboration from four dimensions,that is,the group,the environment,the opportunity and the ability.It interpreted the nonlinear emergence and connotation of the synergy effectiveness of multi-agent co-entrepreneurship,then put forward the emergence mechanism of entrepreneurial team cluster interface synergy effectiveness from the symbiotic win-win situation,dynamic adaptation,the system overall three aspects.Based on this,the paper improves the conventional DEMATEL method,and construct the key influence interface identification method which can respond to the multiple decision guidance in complex scenes,then applied it to a mixed ownership innovation enterprises.The application of case results shows that the proposed framework and analysis method are effective and feasible,which has a certain reference significance for the analysis and evaluation of the emergent property of multi-agent cooperative effects in the complex cooperative situation.
|
|
Received: 13 December 2016
|
|
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
Xu Chenglei
|
|
|
|
［1］段万春,许成磊,魏忠.创新团队管理和谐度及其关键客体界面识别［J］.科技进步与对策,2014,31(12):1-6.
［2］SWINK M.Building collaborative innovation capability［J］.Research Technology Management,2015,49(2):37-47.
［3］ALGUEZAUI S,FILIERI R,ALGUEZAUI S.A knowledge-based view of the extending enterprise for enhancing a collaborative innovation advantage［J］.International Journal of Agile Systems & Management,2014,7(2):116-131.
［4］吴建祖,曾宪聚,赵迎.高层管理团队注意力与企业创新战略——两职合一和组织冗余的调节作用［J］.科学学与科学技术管理,2016,37(5):170-178.
［5］蔡俊亚,党兴华.创业导向与创新绩效:高管团队特征和市场动态性的影响［J］.管理科学,2015,28(5):42-53.
［6］陈劲,阳银娟.协同创新的理论基础与内涵［J］.科学学研究,2012,30(2):161-164.
［7］周锋,孙卫,张颖超,等.创业团队自省性对创业绩效的影响——创业环境动态性的中介作用［J］.科技进步与对策,2014,31(8):152-155.
［8］LEE K C,LEE N,LEE H.Multi-agent knowledge integration mechanism using particle swarm optimization［J］.Technological Forecasting & Social Change,2012,79(3):469-484.
［9］朱仁宏,曾楚宏,代吉林.创业团队研究述评与展望［J］.外国经济与管理,2012,34(11):11-18.
［10］程钧谟,王琪琪,宋美玲,等.基于成本收益的供应链企业间知识共享重复博弈分析［J］.统计与决策,2016,1(1):182-185.
［11］许成磊,段万春.混合非结构MAGDM的决策导向一致性检验方法［J］.计算机工程与应用,2015,51(23):17-22.
［12］许成磊,段万春,孙永河,等.创新团队和谐管理机制的主题辨析优化［J］.管理学报,2014,11(3):390-395.
［13］田晓明,蒋丽,蒋勤峰.创业策略对组织绩效的影响:中介作用的分析［J］.科研管理,2013,34(8):98-105.
［14］史容,傅利平,殷红春.创业效能感对创业意向的多重效应——不同创业动机中介作用的比较［J］.天津大学学报：社会科学版,2016,18(3):231-235.
［15］张波,谢阳群,何刚.跨边界信息资源共享及其在企业创业过程中的作用分析［J］.情报杂志,2014,33(11):181-187.
［16］时运涛,徐挺,张聪群.资源可获得性认知、创业自我效能感与创业意图的关系研究［J］.科技与经济,2014,27(6):71-75.
［17］HUANG K P,WANG K Y.The moderating effect of social capital and environmental dynamism on the link between entrepreneurial orientation and resource acquisition［J］.Quality & Quantity,2013,47(3):1617-1628.
［18］PHILLIPS N,LAWRENCE T B.From the guest editors:educating social entrepreneurs and social innovators［J］.Academy of Management Learning&Education,2012,11(3):319-323.
［19］潘郁,陆书星,潘芳.大数据环境下产学研协同创新网络生态系统架构［J］.科技进步与对策,2014,31(8):1-4.
［20］PORTER M E.Competitive advantage:creating and sustaining superior performance［M］.Canada:Free Press,1998.
［21］霍亚楼.联合研发中的跨组织成本管理及协调［J］.企业经济,2008,1(10):65-67.
［22］周正,尹玲娜,蔡兵.我国产学研协同创新动力机制研究［J］.软科学,2013,27(7):52-56.
［23］张钦朋.产学研协同创新政府引导机制研究——基于“2011计划”实施背景［J］.科技进步与对策,2014,31(5):96-99.
［24］许成磊,朱跃云,段万春,等.多方案DEMATEL的偏好交互与融合方法研究［J］,计算机工程与应用,2016,52(22):75-80..
［25］姚艳虹,夏敦.协同创新动因——协同剩余:形成机理与促进策略［J］.科技进步与对策,2013,30(20):1-5.
［26］谢晖,段万春,孙永河.基于和谐管理理论的创新团队管理——界面系统关键要素辨识［J］.华东经济管理,2014,28(7):142-146.
|
|
|
|
