创业团队市场派与技术派冲突演化机制研究

doi:10.6049/kjjbydc.2022120343

科技进步与对策

2024, Vol. 41

Issue (8): 129-138 DOI: 10.6049/kjjbydc.2022120343

科技人才培育

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

创业团队市场派与技术派冲突演化机制研究

孙继伟¹,丁欣¹,高依芹²

（1.上海大学管理学院，上海 200444；2.大简投资管理（上海）有限公司，上海 200061）

The Conflict Evolution Mechanism between Market Faction and Technology Faction of Entrepreneurial Teams

Sun Jiwei¹,Ding Xin¹,Gao Yiqin²

(1.School of Management, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China;2.Dajian Investment Management (Shanghai) Co.Ltd, Shanghai 200061, China)

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (1381 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要深入探究创业团队市场派与技术派的冲突演化机制，可以为创业企业管理团队冲突提供有益的理论支撑和决策依据。运用扎根理论，构建创业团队市场派与技术派冲突演化机制模型，包含冲突诱因、冲突显现、冲突处理、冲突结果、情景影响因素5个主范畴和20个子范畴。研究发现：5个主范畴对冲突演化的驱动作用各不相同，冲突诱因是诱因驱动因素，冲突显现是中介驱动因素，冲突处理是调节驱动因素，情景影响因素是情景驱动因素，冲突结果则作为结果路径体现冲突演化的最终状态。在创业企业发展的不同阶段，市场派与技术派角色融合伴随冲突演化呈现出3种不同状态。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	孙继伟
	丁欣
	高依芹

关键词 ：创业团队, 市场派, 技术派, 扎根理论, 团队冲突

收稿日期: 2022-12-13 修回日期: 2023-03-10

ZTFLH:

F272.2

基金资助:上海市哲学社会科学规划一般项目（2018BGL006）

作者简介: 孙继伟（1968—），男，山西临县人，博士，上海大学管理学院教授、硕士生导师，研究方向为创新创业管理、问题管理；丁欣（1999—），女，山东日照人，上海大学管理学院硕士研究生，研究方向为创新创业管理；高依芹（1991—），女，山东济南人，大简投资管理（上海）有限公司投资经理，研究方向为创业投资与问题管理。

引用本文:

孙继伟,丁欣,高依芹. 创业团队市场派与技术派冲突演化机制研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2024, 41(8): 129-138.
Sun Jiwei,Ding Xin,Gao Yiqin. The Conflict Evolution Mechanism between Market Faction and Technology Faction of Entrepreneurial Teams. SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY PROGRESS AND POLICY, 2024, 41(8): 129-138.

链接本文:

http://www.kjjb.org/CN/10.6049/kjjbydc.2022120343 或 http://www.kjjb.org/CN/Y2024/V41/I8/129

[1] TIHULA S,HUOVINEN J,FINK M. Entrepreneurial teams vs management teams: reasons for team formation in small firms[J]. Management Research News, 2009, 32(6): 555-566.
[2] FAUCHART E, GRUBER M. Darwinians, communitarians, and missionaries: the role of founder identity in entrepreneurship[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2011, 54(5): 935-957.
[3] ACAR O A,TARAKCI M,VAN KNIPPENBERG D. Creativity and innovation under constraints: a cross-disciplinary integrative review[J]. Journal of Management, 2019, 45(1): 96-121.
[4] ZHOU W, ROSINI E. Entrepreneurial team diversity and performance: toward an integrated model[J]. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 2015, 5(1): 31-60.
[5] ENSLEY M D, CARLAND J W, CARLAND J A C. The effect of entrepreneurial team skill heterogeneity and functional diversity on new venture performance[J]. Journal of Business and Entrepreneurship, 1998, 10(1): 1-21.
[6] COONEY T M. What is an entrepreneurial team[J]. International Small Business Journal, 2005, 23(3): 226-235.
[7] COHEN S G, BAILEY D E. What makes teams work: group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite[J]. Journal of Management, 1997, 23(3): 239-290.
[8] SCHJOEDT L, KRAUS S. Entrepreneurial teams: definition and performance factors[J]. Management Research News, 2009, 32(6): 513-524.
[9] MARTIN D M. The entrepreneurial marketing mix[J]. Qualitative Market Research: an International Journal, 2009, 12(4): 391-403.
[10] 杨俊,张玉利.基于企业家资源禀赋的创业行为过程分析[J].外国经济与管理,2004,26(2):2-6.
[11] 朱斌,吕鹏.中国民营企业成长路径与机制[J].中国社会科学,2020,41(4):138-158,207.
[12] FOWOSIRE R A,IDRIS O Y.Technopreneurship: a view of technology, innovations and entrepreneurship[J]. Global Journal of Research in Engineering, 2017,17(7):41-46.
[13] HASYIM N F S. Technopreneurship membentuk karakter entrepreneur muda yang sukses[M]. Yogyakarta: Deepublish, 2016.
[14] ROBERTS E B. The personality and motivations of technological entrepreneurs[J]. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 1989, 6(1): 5-23.
[15] PURNOMO A, SEPTIANTO A, SUTIKSNO D U, et al. Technopreneur publication: a bibliometric analysis[C].International Conference on Information Management and Technology(ICIMTech),2020.
[16] ANTONCIC B, PRODAN I. Alliances, corporate technological entrepreneurship and firm performance: testing a model on manufacturing firms[J]. Technovation, 2008, 28(5): 257-265.
[17] EFRAT K, GILBOA S, YONATANY M. When marketing and innovation interact: the case of born-global firms[J]. International Business Review, 2017, 26(2): 380-390.
[18] TAJEDDINI K, MUELLER S. Moderating effect of environmental dynamism on the relationship between a firm′s entrepreneurial orientation and financial performance[J]. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 2019, 9(4): 1-13.
[19] OLSON E M, WALKER JR O C, RUEKERT R W. Organizing for effective new product development: the moderating role of product innovativeness[J]. Journal of Marketing, 1995, 59(1): 48-62.
[20] GRIFFIN A, HAUSER J R. Patterns of communication among marketing, engineering and manufacturing:a comparison between two new product teams[J]. Management Science, 1992, 38(3): 360-373.
[21] CRITTENDEN V L, CRITTENDEN W F, FERRELL L K, et al. Market-oriented sustainability: a conceptual framework and propositions[J]. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2011, 39(1): 71-85.
[22] SOUDER W E. Disharmony between R&D and marketing[J]. Industrial Marketing Management, 1981, 10(1): 67-73.
[23] WEINRAUCH J D, ANDERSON R. Conflicts between engineering and marketing units[J]. Industrial Marketing Management, 1982, 11(4): 291-301.
[24] KEAVENEY S M. The blame game: an attribution theory approach to marketer-engineer conflict in high-technology companies[J]. Industrial Marketing Management, 2008, 37(6): 653-663.
[25] 秦颖,马超培,张丽,等.组织中的跨部门冲突理论与实证研究[J].工业技术经济,2010,29(10):105-109.
[26] 吴宗杰,秦颖.企业组织跨部门冲突的归因分析及其管理战略[J].山东师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2003,48(5):133-135.
[27] GRIMPE C, SOFKA W, BHARGAVA M, et al. R&D, marketing innovation, and new product performance: a mixed methods study[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2017, 34(3): 360-383.
[28] 王圣慧,张玉臣,易明.企业内部创业路径研究:以精益创业走出“战争迷雾”[J].科研管理,2017,38(3):144-152.
[29] 李志刚,何诗宁,于秋实,等.海尔集团小微企业的生成路径及其模式分类研究——基于扎根理论方法的探索[J].管理学报,2019,16(6):791-800.
[30] 凯西·卡麦兹. 建构扎根理论:质性研究实践指南[M].边国英,译.重庆:重庆大学出版社,2009.
[31] TU M. An exploratory study of Internet of Things (IoT) adoption intention in logistics and supply chain management: a mixed research approach[J]. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 2018, 29(1): 131-151.