不同类型知识整合对中试有效性的影响

doi:10.6049/kjjbydc.2022060321

科技进步与对策

2023, Vol. 40

Issue (24): 123-132 DOI: 10.6049/kjjbydc.2022060321

知识科学与知识工程

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

不同类型知识整合对中试有效性的影响

林筠,刘冰蕊,蔡颖,张茹鑫

（西安理工大学经济与管理学院，陕西西安 710054）

The Influence of Different Types of Knowledge Integration on the Effectiveness of Pilot and Demonstration Plants

Lin Jun,Liu Bingrui,Cai Ying,Zhang Ruxin

(School of Economic and Management, Xi'an University of Technology, Xi'an 710054, China)

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (1356 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要中试滞后的负面“瓶颈”效应是导致我国科技成果转化率低的关键因素之一。基于此，研究特定领域知识、程序性知识、一般知识三类知识整合影响中试有效性的差异性及其交互作用对中试有效性的影响。研究结果表明：①特定领域知识整合对中试有效性的促进作用优于程序性知识整合与一般知识整合；②程序性知识整合、一般知识整合与特定领域知识整合的交互均对中试有效性产生积极影响，且作用效果强于其单独作用；③程序性知识整合与一般知识整合的交互对中试有效性无显著影响，但在加入特定领域知识整合后，三类知识整合的交互对中试有效性的促进效应增强；④不同性质、不同规模、不同地区企业的中试有效性存在差异。上述研究从不同类型知识整合视角为探究中试实现机制提供了数据支持，有助于进一步明晰中试运行过程。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	林筠
	刘冰蕊
	蔡颖
	张茹鑫

关键词 ：中试, 知识整合, 特定领域知识, 程序性知识, 一般知识

收稿日期: 2022-06-13 修回日期: 2022-08-18

ZTFLH:

F273.1

基金资助:国家社会科学基金项目（18BGL041）；陕西省软科学研究项目（2022KRM088）

作者简介: 林筠（1963—），女，陕西西安人，博士，西安理工大学经济与管理学院教授、博士生导师，研究方向为创新管理与人力资源管理；刘冰蕊（1999—），女，陕西渭南人，西安理工大学经济与管理学院硕士研究生，研究方向为创新管理与人力资源管理；蔡颖（1998—），女，陕西商洛人，西安理工大学经济与管理学院博士研究生，研究方向为创新管理与人力资源管理；张茹鑫（1993—），男，河南三门峡人，西安理工大学经济与管理学院博士研究生，研究方向为创新管理与人力资源管理。

引用本文:

林筠,刘冰蕊,蔡颖,张茹鑫. 不同类型知识整合对中试有效性的影响[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2023, 40(24): 123-132.
Lin Jun,Liu Bingrui,Cai Ying,Zhang Ruxin. The Influence of Different Types of Knowledge Integration on the Effectiveness of Pilot and Demonstration Plants. SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY PROGRESS AND POLICY, 2023, 40(24): 123-132.

链接本文:

http://www.kjjb.org/CN/10.6049/kjjbydc.2022060321 或 http://www.kjjb.org/CN/Y2023/V40/I24/123

[1] 吴鹏飞, 林筠. 实验室验证对技术转移影响研究:双元学习视角[J].科研管理, 2022, 43(3): 164-172.
[2] 邱超凡. 基于中试资源共享的科技成果转化战略[J].中国发展观察, 2015,11(9): 54-55.
[3] NORDQVIST S, FRISHAMMAR J. Knowledge types to progress the development of sustainable technologies: a case study of Swedish demonstration plants[J].International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 2019, 15(1): 75-95.
[4] HELLSMARK H, FRISHAMMAR J, SDERHOLM P, et al. The role of pilot and demonstration plants in technology development and innovation policy[J].Research Policy, 2016, 45(9): 1743-1761.
[5] HELLSMARK H, SDERHOLM P. Innovation policies for advanced biorefinery development: key considerations and lessons from Sweden[J].Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, 2017, 11(1): 28-40.
[6] MOSSBERG J, SDERHOLM P, HELLSMARK H, et al. Crossing the biorefinery valley of death:a role-based typology for understanding actor networks ability to overcome barriers in sustainability transitions[J].Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 2018, 27(2): 83-101.
[7] FRISHAMMAR J, SDERHOLM P, HELLSMARK H, et al. A knowledge-based perspective on system weaknesses in technological innovation systems[J].Science and Public Policy, 2019, 46(1): 55-70.
[8] RUNDQUIST J. The ability to integrate different types of knowledge and its effect on innovation performance[J].International Journal of Innovation Management, 2012, 16(2): 1-32.
[9] FRISHAMMAR J, SDERHOLM P, BCKSTRM K. The role of pilot and demonstration plants in technological development: synthesis and directions for future research[J].Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 2015, 27(1): 1-18.
[10] 王帅帅. 我国中试基地的发展建言[J].科技导报, 2012, 30(15): 11-11.
[11] TOLIO T, COPANI G, TERKAJ W. Key research priorities for factories of the future-part II: pilot plants and funding mechanisms[M].Factories of the Future. Springer, Cham, 2019.
[12] SHAKEEL S R, TAKALA J, ZHU L D. Commercialization of renewable energy technologies: a ladder building approach[J].Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2017, 78(10): 855-867.
[13] BOSSINK B A G. Demonstrating sustainable energy: a review based model of sustainable energy demonstration projects[J].Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2017, 77(12): 1349-1362.
[14] ULLMAN D G. The mechanical design process[M].New York: McGraw-Hill, 1992.
[15] RAMESH B, TIWANA A. Supporting collaborative process knowledge management in new product development teams[J].Decision Support Systems, 1999, 27(1-2): 213-235.
[16] COURT A W. The relationship between information and personal knowledge in new product development[J].International Journal of Information Management, 1997, 17(2): 123-138.
[17] THOMAS E, OBAL M. Type of knowledge sharing and its impact on collaborative new product development[J].International Journal of Innovation Management, 2018, 22(2): 1850020.
[18] ROBERT JR L P, DENNIS A R, AHUJA M K. Social capital and knowledge integration in digitally enabled teams[J].Information Systems Research, 2008, 19(3): 314-334.
[19] WANG M C, CHEN P C, FANG S C. A critical view of knowledge networks and innovation performance:the mediation role of firms' knowledge integration capability[J].Journal of Business Research, 2018, 88(7): 222-233.
[20] MARDANI A, NIKOOSOKHAN S, MORADI M, et al. The relationship between knowledge management and innovation performance[J].The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 2018, 29(1): 12-26.
[21] AMANKWAH-AMOAH J,ADOMAKO S.The effects of knowledge integration and contextual ambidexterity on innovation in entrepreneurial ventures[J].Journal of Business Research,2021,127(6):312-321.
[22] RUI Z,LYYTINEN K.How do ventures become more innovative?the effect of external search and ambidextrous knowledge integration[J].European Journal of Innovation Management,2019,22(5):845-865.
[23] FRISHAMMAR J,LICHTENTHALER U,RUNDQUIST J.Identifying technology commercialization opportunities: the importance of integrating product development knowledge[J].Journal of Product Innovation Management,2012,29(4): 573-589.
[24] SALUNKE S, WEERAWARDENA J, MCCOLL-KENNEDY J R. The central role of knowledge integration capability in service innovation-based competitive strategy[J].Industrial Marketing Management, 2019, 76(1): 144-156.
[25] WEN X, WU G, KANG Q, et al. A study on customer knowledge management, inbound open innovation and firm performance[J].Human Systems Management, 2020, 39(2): 183-195.
[26] ANTUNES H J G, PINHEIRO P G. Linking knowledge management, organizational learning and memory[J].Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 2020, 5(2): 140-149.
[27] TSAI K H,LIAO Y C,HSU T T.Does the use of knowledge integration mechanisms enhance product innovativeness[J].Industrial Marketing Management,2015,46(3):214-223.
[28] BIAZZO S, FILIPPINI R. Product Development:managing uncertainty and knowledge integration[M].Product Innovation Management. Springer, Cham, 2021.
[29] ESLAMI M H, LAKEMOND N, BRUSONI S. The dynamics of knowledge integration in collaborative product development: evidence from the capital goods industry[J].Industrial Marketing Management, 2018, 75(8): 146-159.
[30] ZHANG M, QI Y, WANG Z, et al. How does intellectual capital affect product innovation performance? evidence from China and India[J].International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 2018, 38(3): 895-914.
[31] MARCH J G. Explorative and exploitative in organizational learning [J].Organization Science, 1991, 2(1):71-87.
[32] OLSEN D S, ANDERSEN P D. Learning to make technology work-a study of learning in technology demonstration projects[C].International Conference on Organisational Learning, Knowledge and Capabilities, 2014.
[33] MOSSBERG J, FRISHAMMAR J, SDERHOLM P, et al. Managerial and organizational challenges encountered in the development of sustainable technology: analysis of Swedish biorefinery pilot and demonstration plants[J].Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 276(35): 124150.