可追溯实践、动态能力对企业创新绩效的影响：以制造企业为例

doi:10.6049/kjjbydc.2022010138

科技进步与对策

2023, Vol. 40

Issue (9): 65-73 DOI: 10.6049/kjjbydc.2022010138

企业创新管理

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

可追溯实践、动态能力对企业创新绩效的影响：以制造企业为例

周雄勇¹,许志端²

（1. 上海交通大学安泰经济与管理学院上海 200030；2. 厦门大学管理学院，福建厦门 361005）

The Impact of Traceability Practices and Dynamic Capabilities on Firm Innovation Performance: A Case of Manufacturing Firms

Zhou Xiongyong¹,Xu Zhiduan²

(1. Antai College of Economics & Management, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China;2. School of Management, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China)

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (1398 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要创新是企业保持长期竞争优势的关键。在数字经济时代，制造企业可追溯实践能否及如何改善创新绩效受到实业界和学界高度关注。基于动态能力理论，提出可追溯实践和动态能力对创新绩效（产品创新、流程创新、管理创新）影响的理论模型与研究假设。采用问卷调查法对279家中国本土制造企业进行调查，运用结构方程模型进行实证检验。结果发现：①制造企业可追溯实践对产品创新、流程创新和管理创新均具有显著正向影响；②可追溯实践在促进创新绩效改善过程中受动态能力的中介作用，其中，动态能力在可追溯实践对流程创新和管理创新的影响过程中发挥部分中介效应，在可追溯实践对产品创新的影响过程中发挥完全中介效应。研究结论可为制造企业全面认识可追溯实践价值，以及动态能力在推动可追溯实践以促进创新绩效改善过程中的重要作用提供理论指导和管理启示。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	周雄勇
	许志端

关键词 ：可追溯实践, 创新绩效, 动态能力, 制造企业

收稿日期: 2022-01-06 修回日期: 2022-03-05

ZTFLH:

F273.1

基金资助:国家自然科学基金项目（71872155）

作者简介: 周雄勇（1991—），男，福建石狮人，博士，上海交通大学安泰经济与管理学院博士后，研究方向为供应链可追溯；许志端（1966—），女，福建德化人，博士，厦门大学管理学院教授、博士生导师，研究方向为可持续供应链管理。

引用本文:

周雄勇,许志端. 可追溯实践、动态能力对企业创新绩效的影响：以制造企业为例[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2023, 40(9): 65-73.
Zhou Xiongyong,Xu Zhiduan. The Impact of Traceability Practices and Dynamic Capabilities on Firm Innovation Performance: A Case of Manufacturing Firms. SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY PROGRESS AND POLICY, 2023, 40(9): 65-73.

链接本文:

http://www.kjjb.org/CN/10.6049/kjjbydc.2022010138 或 http://www.kjjb.org/CN/Y2023/V40/I9/65

[1] HONG J, LIAO Y, ZHANG Y, et al. The effect of supply chain quality management practices and capabilities on operational and innovation performance: evidence from chinese manufacturers [J].International Journal of Production Economics, 2019, 212: 227-235.
[2] GILLANI F, CHATHA K A, JAJJA M S S, et al. Implementation of digital manufacturing technologies: antecedents and consequences [J].International Journal of Production Economics, 2020, 229: 107748.
[3] HASTIG G M, SODHI M S. Blockchain for supply chain traceability: business requirements and critical success factors [J].Production and Operations Management, 2020, 29(4): 935-954.
[4] GARCIA-TORRES S, ALBAREDA L, REY-GARCIA M, et al. Traceability for sustainability-literature review and conceptual framework [J].Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 2019, 24(1): 85-106.
[5] COUSINS P D, LAWSON B, PETERSEN K J, et al. Investigating green supply chain management practices and performance: the moderating roles of supply chain ecocentricity and traceability [J].International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 2019, 39(5): 767-786.
[6] WANG X, LI D, O'BRIEN C, et al. A production planning model to reduce risk and improve operations management [J].International Journal of Production Economics, 2010, 124(2): 463-474.
[7] ALFARO J A, RABADE L A. Traceability as a strategic tool to improve inventory management: a case study in the food industry [J].International Journal of Production Economics, 2009, 118(1): 104-110.
[8] YUAN C, WANG S, YU X. The impact of food traceability system on consumer perceived value and purchase intention in China [J].Industrial Management & Data Systems, 2020, 120(4): 810-824.
[9] SONG M X, YANG M X. Leveraging core capabilities and environmental dynamism for food traceability and firm performance in a food supply chain: a moderated mediation model [J].Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2019, 18(8): 1820-1837.
[10] ZHOU X, PULLMAN M, XU Z. The impact of food supply chain traceability on sustainability performance [J].Operations Management Research, 2021: 1-23.
[11] SHOU Y, ZHAO X, DAI J, et al. Matching traceability and supply chain coordination: achieving operational innovation for superior performance [J].Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 2021, 145: 102181.
[12] EPELBAUM F M B, MARTINEZ M G. The technological evolution of food traceability systems and their impact on firm sustainable performance: a RBV approach [J].International Journal of Production Economics, 2014, 150: 215-224.
[13] O'REILLY C A, TUSHMAN M L. Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: resolving the innovator's dilemma [J].Research in Organizational Behavior, 2008, 28: 185-206.
[14] ABD RAHMAN A, SINGHRY H B, HANAFIAH M H, et al. Influence of perceived benefits and traceability system on the readiness for halal assurance system implementation among food manufacturers [J].Food Control, 2017, 73: 1318-1326.
[15] ENGELSETH P, WONGTHATSANEKORN W, CHAROENSIRIWATH C. Food product traceability and customer value [J].Global Business Review, 2014, 15: 87-105.
[16] PRAJOGO D I, SOHAL A S. The relationship between TQM practices, quality performance, and innovation performance [J].International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 2003, 20(8): 901-918.
[17] GUNDAY G, ULUSOY G, KILIC K, et al. Effects of innovation types on firm performance [J].International Journal of Production Economics, 2011, 133(2): 662-676.
[18] KIM D Y, KUMAR V, KUMAR U. Relationship between quality management practices and innovation [J].Journal of Operations Management, 2012, 30(4): 295-315.
[19] ZENG J, PHAN C A, MATSUI Y. The impact of hard and soft quality management on quality and innovation performance: an empirical study [J].International Journal of Production Economics, 2015, 162: 216-226.
[20] HEW J-J, WONG L W, TAN G W H, et al. The blockchain-based halal traceability systems: a hype or reality [J].Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 2020, 25(6): 863-879.
[21] 张颖, 顾远东, 高杰. 服务化与产品创新：环境不确定性的调节效应 [J].科研管理, 2020, 41(4): 140-150.
[22] 周锋, 顾晓敏, 韩慧媛, 等. 质量管理实践、吸收能力与创新绩效：基于船舶企业智能制造视角 [J].科技进步与对策, 2021, 38(7): 67-75.
[23] KAYNAK H. The relationship between total quality management practices and their effects on firm performance [J].Journal of Operations Management, 2003, 21(4): 405-435.
[24] TEECE D J, PISANO G, SHUEN A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management [J].Strategic Management Journal，1997, 18(7): 509-533.
[25] IRFAN M, WANG M, AKHTAR N. Impact of IT capabilities on supply chain capabilities and organizational agility: a dynamic capability view [J].Operations Management Research, 2019, 12(3): 113-128.
[26] ARMSTRONG J S, OVERTON T S. Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys [J].Journal of Marketing Research, 1977, 14(3): 396-402.
[27] WU L Y. Applicability of the resource-based and dynamic-capability views under environmental volatility [J].Journal of Business Research, 2010, 63(1): 27-31.
[28] PODSAKOFF P M, MACKENZIE S B, LEE J-Y, et al. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies [J].Journal of Applied Psychology, 2003, 88(5): 879-903.