组织冗余、风险承担能力与企业绿色创新战略——来自重污染行业上市公司的经验证据

doi:10.6049/kjjbydc.2022040024

科技进步与对策

2023, Vol. 40

Issue (8): 66-77 DOI: 10.6049/kjjbydc.2022040024

企业发展与绿色转型

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

组织冗余、风险承担能力与企业绿色创新战略——来自重污染行业上市公司的经验证据

刘宇嘉,刘力钢,邵剑兵

（辽宁大学商学院，辽宁沈阳 110136）

Organizational Slack,Risk-taking Capability and Green Innovation Strategy: Evidence from Listed Enterprises of the Heavily-polluting Industries

Liu Yujia,Liu Ligang,Shao Jianbing

(Business School,Liaoning University,Shenyang 110136,China)

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (7)

全文: PDF (1286 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要组织冗余是企业通过构建资源优势促进绿色创新战略的重要途径。基于组织理论与资源约束理论框架，以“资源—能力—行为”为理论逻辑，利用2012—2020年沪深A股重污染行业上市公司面板数据进行实证分析，探究组织冗余对绿色创新战略的影响，并以风险承担能力为中介变量，以数字化环境为调节变量，构建有调节的中介模型。结果发现：沉淀性冗余、非沉淀性冗余与绿色创新战略呈U型关系；风险承担能力在沉淀性冗余、非沉淀性冗余与绿色创新战略的U型关系间发挥部分中介作用；数字化环境正向调节沉淀性冗余、非沉淀性冗余与绿色创新战略的关系，同时正向调节风险承担能力在沉淀性冗余与绿色创新战略关系间的中介作用。结论可为重污染行业企业通过组织冗余建立风险屏障并顺应数字化环境积极开展绿色创新提供理论与实践依据。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	刘宇嘉
	刘力钢
	邵剑兵

关键词 ：绿色创新战略, 组织冗余, 风险承担能力, 数字化环境, 重污染行业

收稿日期: 2022-04-01 修回日期: 2022-07-10

ZTFLH:

F273.1

基金资助:国家社会科学基金项目（18BGL081）

作者简介: 刘宇嘉（1994—），女，内蒙古赤峰人，辽宁大学商学院博士研究生，研究方向为战略管理与可持续发展；刘力钢（1955—），男，辽宁沈阳人，博士，辽宁大学商学院教授、博士生导师，研究方向为战略管理与可持续发展；邵剑兵（1973—），男，辽宁盘锦人，博士，辽宁大学商学院教授、博士生导师，研究方向为战略管理与公司治理。

引用本文:

刘宇嘉,刘力钢,邵剑兵. 组织冗余、风险承担能力与企业绿色创新战略——来自重污染行业上市公司的经验证据[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2023, 40(8): 66-77.
Liu Yujia,Liu Ligang,Shao Jianbing. Organizational Slack,Risk-taking Capability and Green Innovation Strategy: Evidence from Listed Enterprises of the Heavily-polluting Industries. SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY PROGRESS AND POLICY, 2023, 40(8): 66-77.

链接本文:

http://www.kjjb.org/CN/10.6049/kjjbydc.2022040024 或 http://www.kjjb.org/CN/Y2023/V40/I8/66

[1] MIN H A,ML B,ZL A. Do politically connected CEOs promote Chinese listed industrial firms' green innovation? the mediating role of external governance environments[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2021,278(1):1-11.
[2] 于波.绿色信贷政策如何影响重污染企业技术创新[J].经济管理,2021,43(11):35-51.
[3] LIU H,YAN J,MENG S,et al. Practice and understanding of developing new technologies and equipment for green and low-carbon production of oilfields[J]. Frontiers of Engineering Management,2019,6(4): 517-523.
[4] 柏群,杨云.组织冗余资源对绿色创新绩效的影响——基于社会责任的中介作用[J].财经科学,2020,393(12):96-106.
[5] 江旭,沈奥.未吸收冗余、绿色管理实践与企业绩效的关系研究[J].管理学报,2018,15(4):539-547.
[6] WU H,HU S. The impact of synergy effect between government subsidies and slack resources on green technology innovation[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2020,274(1):1-12.
[7] ZOU H,ZENG S,LIN H,et al. Corporate board characteristics,resource slackness and environmental performance: empirical study from chinese listed manufacturing companies[J]. Journal of Systems & Management,2016,25 (2):193-202.
[8] VANACKER T,COLLEWAERT V,ZAHRA S A. Slack resources,firm performance,and the institutional context: evidence from privately held European firms[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2017,38(6):1305-1326.
[9] LEYVA D,FERRONVILCHEZ V,ARAGONCORREA J A. Do firms' slack resources influence the relationship between focused environmental innovations and financial performance? more is not always better[J]. Journal of Business Ethics,2019,159(4):1215-1227.
[10] YANG L,QIN H,LI L,et al. Resource slack,environmental management maturity and enterprise environmental protection investment: an enterprise life cycle adjustment perspective[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2021,309(1):1-11.
[11] ZHANG F,CHEN J,ZHU L,et al. Does resource slack promote or constrain firm environmental management investment? moderating roles of technology sources[J]. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence,2021,33(5):590-613.
[12] 董保宝.风险需要平衡吗:新企业风险承担与绩效倒U型关系及创业能力的中介作用[J].管理世界,2014,30(1):120-131.
[13] MARCH J G,SIMON H A. Organizations[J]. Social Science Electronic Publishing,1958,2(1):105-132.
[14] PENROSE E T. The growth of the firm[M].Oxford: Oxford Basil Blackwell,1959.
[15] GULATI N R. Is slack good or bad for innovation[J]. Academy of Management Journal,1996,39(5):1245-1264.
[16] SHARFMAN M P,WOLF G,TANSIK C D A. Antecedents of organizational slack[J]. Academy of Management Review,1988,13(4):601-614.
[17] 王娟茹,崔日晓,张渝.利益相关者环保压力、外部知识采用与绿色创新——市场不确定性与冗余资源的调节效应[J].研究与发展管理,2021,33(4):15-27.
[18] 李晓翔,霍国庆.中小企业沉淀冗余对产品创新的影响机制——基于跨界搜索和环境特征的视角[J].经济管理,2013,35(1):171-185.
[19] 曹翠珍,冯娇龙.冗余资源对绿色创新模式选择的影响：环境规制的整合视角[J].管理评论,2022,34(5):124-135.
[20] GREVE R. A behavioral theory of R&D expenditures and innovations: evidence from shipbuilding[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2003,46(6) :685-702.
[21] 张凌宇,王搏.冗余资源、战略导向与企业绩效关系研究[J].预测,2021,40(2):61-67.
[22] MISHINA Y, POLLOCK T G, PORAC J F. Are more resources always better for growth? resource stickiness in market and product expansion[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2004,25(12): 1179-1197.
[23] 李晓翔,霍国庆.组织冗余对产品创新的作用机制研究[J].科研管理,2015,36(9):72-79.
[24] SHEPPARD M. The relationship between discretionary slack and growth in small firms[J]. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal,2020,16(1):195-219.
[25] TAN J,PENG M W. Organizational slack and firm performance during economic transitions: two studies from an emerging economy[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2003,24(13):1249-1263.
[26] ISLAM S,GHOSH R,KHATUN A. Slack resources,free cash flow and corporate social responsibility expenditure: evidence from an emerging economy[J]. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies,2021,11(4): 533-551.
[27] LYER D N,MILLER K D. Performance feedback,slack,and the timing of acquisitions[J].Academy of Management Journal,2008,51(4):808-822.
[28] ADOMAKO S,NGUYEN N P. Human resource slack,sustainable innovation,and environmental performance of small and medium‐sized enterprises in sub‐Saharan Africa[J]. Business Strategy and the Environment,2020,29(8): 2984-2994.
[29] 李晓翔,刘春林.困难情境下组织冗余作用研究:兼谈市场搜索强度的调节作用[J].南开管理评论,2013,16(3):140-148，160.
[30] BAO G,ZHANG W,XIAO Z,et al. Slack resources and growth performance: the mediating roles of product and process innovation capabilities[J]. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation,2020,28(1): 60-76.
[31] 张兆国,韩晓宇.董事长社会知名度与企业风险承担能力[J].中国软科学,2020,35(8):101-109.
[32] KISS A N,FERNHABER S,MCDOUGALL-COVIN P P. Slack,innovation,and export intensity: implications for small- and medium-sized enterprises[J]. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice,2018,42 (5) :671-697.
[33] BROMILEY P. Testing a causal model of corporate risk taking and performance[J]. Academy of Management Journal,1991,34(1):37-59.
[34] AGUSTI-PEREZ M,GALAN J L,ACEDO F J. Relationship between slack resources and performance: temporal symmetry and duration of effects[J]. European Journal of Management and Business Economics,2020,29(3),255-275.
[35] 曹文文,李健,潘镇.企业创新、产权性质与组织冗余[J].科学决策,2018，25(6):78-94.
[36] 徐高彦,王晶.多元化程度与盈余持续性:机会抑或威胁[J].审计与经济研究,2020,35(4):105-115.
[37] COLES J L,DANIEL N D,NAVEEN L. Managerial incentives and risk-taking[J]. Journal of Financial Economics,2006,79(2):431-468.
[38] DESS G G, LUMPKIN G T. The role of entrepreneurial orientation in stimulating effective corporate entrepreneurship[J]. Academy of Management Perspectives,2005,19 (1):147-156.
[39] 王锋正,刘向龙,张蕾,等.数字化促进了资源型企业绿色技术创新吗[J].科学学研究,2022,40(2):332-344.
[40] 宋德勇,朱文博,丁海.企业数字化能否促进绿色技术创新——基于重污染行业上市公司的考察[J].财经研究,2022,48(4):34-48.
[41] LI M,JIA S. Resource orchestration for innovation: the dual role of information technology[J]. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management,2018,30(10):1136-1147.
[42] 戚聿东,蔡呈伟.数字化对制造业企业绩效的多重影响及其机理研究[J].学习与探索,2020，42(7):108-119.
[43] 王建玲,李玥婷,吴璇.企业社会责任与风险承担:基于资源依赖理论视角[J].预测,2019,38(3):45-51.
[44] 齐绍洲,林屾,崔静波.环境权益交易市场能否诱发绿色创新——基于我国上市公司绿色专利数据的证据[J].经济研究,2018,53(12):129-143.
[45] 于连超,张卫国,毕茜.环境税会倒逼企业绿色创新吗[J].审计与经济研究,2019,34(2):79-90.
[46] 陈静,曾德明,欧阳晓平.知识重组能力与高新技术企业绩效——冗余资源与创新开放度的调节效应分析[J].管理工程学报,2021,35(3):23-33.
[47] 何瑛,于文蕾,杨棉之.CEO复合型职业经历、企业风险承担与企业价值[J].中国工业经济,2019，36(9):155-173.