The Effect of Negative Links: How Innovation Network Evolves
Cheng Lu1, Li Li2
(1.School of Maritime Economics and Management, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116024, China;2.College of Economics and Management, Zhengzhou University of Light Industry,Zhengzhou 450002, China)
[1] GIULIANI E. Network dynamics in regional clusters:evidence from Chile[J]. Research Policy, 2013, 42(8): 1406-1419. [2] 石乘齐. 基于组织间依赖的创新网络演化模型及仿真研究[J]. 管理工程学报, 2019, 33(1): 12-22. [3] CHENG L, LYU Y, SU J, et al. Inbound openness and its impact on innovation performance: an agent-based and simulation approach[J]. R&D Management, 2020, 50(2): 212-226. [4] RIBEIRO P, MARQUES T S, SANTOS H. Innovation networks anchored into a regional scale: looking for smart specialization tendencies in the portuguese Centro Region[C]//Third European Conference on Social Networks EUSN 2017. 2017. [5] MENG F, MEDO M, BUECHEL B. Whom to trust in a signed network? optimal solution and two heuristic rules[J]. Information Sciences, 2022, 606: 742-762. [6] SCHULER P. The broker's invisible ties: brokerage and balance in signed networks[EB/OL]. 2021. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A1595002&dswid=-8610 [7] HARRIGAN N M, LABIANCA G J, AGNEESSENS F. Negative ties and signed graphs research: stimulating research on dissociative forces in social networks[J]. Social Networks, 2020, 60: 1-10. [8] TEIXEIRA A S, SANTOS F C, FRANCISCO A P. Emergence of social balance in signed networks[C]//International Workshop on Complex Networks. Springer, Cham, 2017. [9] KEUCHENIUS A, TRNBERG P, UITERMARK J. Why it is important to consider negative ties when studying polarized debates: a signed network analysis of a Dutch cultural controversy on Twitter[J]. PloS one, 2021, 16(8): e0256696. [10] SUMMERS T H, SHAMES I. Active influence in dynamical models of structural balance in social networks[J]. EPL (Europhysics Letters), 2013, 103(1): 18001. [11] LERNER J. Structural balance in signed networks: separating the probability to interact from the tendency to fight[J]. Social Networks, 2016, 45: 66-77. [12] ISAKOV A, FOWLER J H, AIROLDI E M, et al. The structure of negative social ties in rural village networks[J]. Sociological Science, 2019, 6: 197-218. [13] STADTFELD C, TAKCS K, VRS A. The emergence and stability of groups in social networks[J]. Social Networks, 2020, 60: 129-145. [14] YANG S W, TRINCADO F, LABIANCA G J, et al. Negative ties at work[M]//Social networks at work. Routledge, 2019: 49-78. [15] 吕一博, 程露, 苏敬勤. 知识搜索行为与区域创新网络演化：一个多主体仿真研究[J]. 系统工程学报, 2014, 29(6): 725-733，753. [16] ROPER S, LOVE J H. Knowledge context, learning and innovation: an integrating framework[J]. Industry and Innovation, 2018, 25(4): 339-364. [17] BURT R S. Structural holes versus network closure as social capital[J]. Social Capital, 2017: 31-56. [18] MOLLENHORST G, VLKER B, FLAP H. Shared contexts and triadic closure in core discussion networks[J]. Social Networks, 2011, 33(4): 292-302. [19] YIN H, BENSON A R, UGANDER J. Measuring directed triadic closure with closure coefficients[J]. Network Science, 2020, 8(4): 551-573. [20] FENG D, ALTMEYER R, STAFFORD D, et al. Testing for balance in social networks[J]. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 2022, 117(537): 156-174. [21] FRITSCH M, KAUFFELD-MONZ M. The impact of network structure on knowledge transfer: an application of social network analysis in the context of regional innovation networks [J].The Annals of Regional Science, 2010, 44(1): 21-38. [22] SNIJDERS, TAB, PATTISON P,et al. New specifica-tions for exponential random graph models [J]. Sociological Methodology, 2006, 36(1):99-153. [23] ROBINS G, PATTISON P, WANG P. Closure, connectivity and degree distributions: Exponential random graph (p*) models for directed social networks [J]. Social Networks, 2009, 31(2): 105-117. [24] KIRKLEY A, CANTWELL G T, NEWMAN M E J. Balance in signed networks[J]. Physical Review E, 2019, 99(1): 012320. [25] YAP J, HARRIGAN N. Why does everybody hate me? balance, status, and homophily: the triumvirate of signed tie formation[J]. Social Networks, 2015, 40: 103-122. [26] ESTRADA E, BENZI M. Are social networks really balanced [EB/OL]. 2014. https://arxiv.org/abs/1406.2132. [27] HUMMON N P, DOREIAN P. Some dynamics of social balance processes: bringing Heider back into balance theory[J]. Social Networks, 2003, 25(1): 17-49. [28] GAWRONSKI P, GRONEK P, KULAKOWSKI K. The Heider balance and social distance[J]. Acta Physica Polonica B, 2005,36(8):2549-2558. [29] MARVEL S A, KLEINBERG J, KLEINBERG R D,et al. Continuous-time model of structural balance[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2011, 108(5): 1771-1776. [30] HOWELLS J. Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation [J]. Research policy, 2006, 35(5): 715-728. [31] 吕一博, 程露, 苏敬勤. “资源导向” 下中小企业集群网络演进的仿真研究[J]. 科研管理, 2013, 34(1): 131-139. [32] BONACICH P, LLOYD P. Calculating status with negative relations [J]. Social Networks, 2004, 26(4): 331-338. [33] KAMVAR S D, SCHLOSSER M T, GARCIA-MOLINA H. The eigentrust algorithm for reputation management in p2p networks [C]//Proceedings of the 12th international conference on World Wide Web. ACM, 2003. [34] O'MADADHAIN J, FISHERD, SMYTH P, et al. Analysis and visualization of network data using JUNG[J]. Journal of Statistical Software, 2005, 10(2): 1-35. [35] WATTS D J, STROGATZ S H. Collective dynamics of 'small-world' networks [J]. Nature, 1998, 393(6684): 440-442. [36] COLEMAN J S. Social capital in the creation of human capital [J]. American Journal of Sociology, 1988, 94: S95-S120. [37] MOODY J. The structure of a social science collaboration network:disciplinary cohesion from 1963 to 1999[J]. American Sociological Review, 2004, 69(2): 213-238.
