A Study on the Influence Mechanism of Top Management Team Cognitive Interaction on Innovation Performance: An Investigation of the Moderated Mediation Effects
Yu Hao1,Liu Wenhao1,Chen Chong2
（1.School of Management, Zhejiang University of Technology;2.School of Information Engineering, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China）
余浩,刘文浩,陈崇. 高管团队认知交互与创新绩效的关系：有调节的中介效应检验[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2020, 37(20): 145-152.
Yu Hao,Liu Wenhao,Chen Chong. A Study on the Influence Mechanism of Top Management Team Cognitive Interaction on Innovation Performance: An Investigation of the Moderated Mediation Effects. SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY PROGRESS AND POLICY, 2020, 37(20): 145-152.
[1] 武亚军. “战略框架式思考”、“悖论整合”与企业竞争优势——任正非的认知模式分析及管理启示[J]. 管理世界, 2013,29(4):150-167.[2] ZHENG Y. Unlocking founding team prior shared experience: a transactive memory system perspective[J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2012, 27(5):577-591.[3] HEAVEY C, SIMSEK Z. Transactive memory systems and firm performance: an upper echelons perspective[J]. Organization Science, 2015, 26(4):941-959.[4] DANIEL G B, RYAN G. A dual-process contingency model of leadership, transactive memory systems and team performance[J].2019,96:297-308.[5] HEAVEY C, SIMSEK Z. Transactive memory systems and firm performance: an upper echelons perspective[J]. Organization Science, 2015, 26(4):941-959.[6] ARGOTE L, GUO J M. Routines and transactive memory systems: creating, coordinating, retaining, and transferring knowledge in organizations[J]. Research in Organizational Behavior, 2016, (36):65-84.[7] MILLER K D, PENTLAND B T, SEUNGHO CHOI. Dynamics of Performing and Remembering Organizational Routines[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2012, 49(8):1536-1558.[8] ISENBERG D J. The big idea: how to start an entrepreneurial revolution[J]. Harvard Business Review, 2010, 88(6):40-50.[9] 尚航标, 黄培伦. 管理认知与动态环境下企业竞争优势万和集团案例研究[J]. 南开管理评论, 2010, 13(3):70-79.[10] 于晓宇, 席瑞, 陈依, 等. 交互记忆系统与产品创新性:创业拼凑的中介作用[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2019, 40(3):83-98.[11] MELL J N, VAN K D, VAN G. The catalyst effect: the impact of transactive memory system structure on team performance[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2014, 57(4):1154-1173.[12] LEWIS K, HERNDON B. Transactive memory systems: Current issues and future research directions [J]. Organization Science, 2011, 22(5):1254-1265.[13] LIAO J, JIMMIESON N L, O'BRIEN A T. Developing transactive memory systems: theoretical contributions from a social identity perspective[J]. Group & Organization Management, 2012, 37(2):204-240.[14] 林筠, 王蒙. 交互记忆系统对团队探索式学习和利用式学习的影响: 以团队反思为中介[J]. 管理评论, 2014, 26(6):143-150+176.[15] 卢启程, 梁琳琳, 贾非. 战略学习如何影响组织创新——基于动态能力的视角[J]. 管理世界, 2018,34(9):109-129.[16] 董保宝, 葛宝山, 王侃. 资源整合过程、动态能力与竞争优势:机理与路径[J]. 管理世界, 2011，27(3):92-101.[17] REN Y, ARGOTE L. Transactive memory systems 1985-2010: an integrative framework of dimensions, antecedents and consequences[J]. Academy of Management Annals, 2011, 5(1):189-230.[18] 屈晓倩, 刘新梅. 信息型团队断裂与团队创造力关系的实证研究——交互记忆系统的中介作用[J]. 研究与发展管理, 2016 (1):52-61.[19] ARGOTE L, REN Y. Transactive memory systems: a microfoundation of dynamic capabilities[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2012, 49(8):1375-1382.[20] WU L. Applicability of the resource - based and dynamic capability views under environmental volatility[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2010, 63(1):27-31.[21] 李晓宇, 陈国卿. 信息技术投入、技术创新动态能力与企业绩效关系研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2019, 36(16):100-107.[22] 马文聪, 朱桂龙. 环境动态性对技术创新和绩效关系的调节作用[J]. 科学学研究, 2011, 29(3):454-460.[23] 简兆权, 王晨, 陈键宏. 战略导向、动态能力与技术创新:环境不确定性的调节作用[J]. 研究与发展管理, 2015, 27(2):65-76.[24] 何一清, 崔连广, 张敬伟. 互动导向对创新过程的影响——创新能力的中介作用与资源拼凑的调节作用[J]. 南开管理评论, 2015, 18(4):96-105.[25] CHEN X G, LI X, CLARK J G, et al. Knowledge sharing in open source software project teams: a transactive memory system perspective [J]. International Journal of Information Management, 2013 (33):553-563.[26] LAVIE D, STETTNER U, TUSHMAN M L. Exploration and exploitation within and across organizations[J]. Academy of Management annals, 2010, 4(1):109-155.[27] 冯鹤鸣. 高管团队认知、政治关联与纵向一体化关系的研究[D]. 广州：华南理工大学, 2018.[28] 黄海艳, 武蓓. 交互记忆系统、动态能力与创新绩效关系研究[J]. 科研管理,2016, 37(4):68-76.[29] HAIR J F, ANDERSON R E, TATHAM R L, et al. Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.) [M]. Prentice Hall,1998: 648-650.[30] PREACHER K J, HAYES A F. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models[J]. Behavour Research Methods, 2008, 40(3):879-891.[31] 陈晓刚, 李雪, 崔颖安. 交互记忆系统对知识分享的影响机制研究—基于开源软件团队的检验[J]. 科研管理,2014,35(6): 145-153.[32] WANG Y-Y, HUANG Q, DAVISON R M. Effect of transactive memory systems on team performance mediated by knowledge transfer[J]. International Journal of Information Management, 2018, 41:65-79.[33] 蔡俊亚, 党兴华. 交互记忆系统对团队绩效的影响机制研究——基于团队反思的中介效应和团队学习的调节效应[J]. 预测, 2015, 34(05):28-33.[34] 吕逸婧, 陈守明, 邵婉玲. 高管团队交互记忆系统与组织绩效:战略柔性的中介作用[J]. 南开管理评论, 2018, 21(1):216-224.[35] 史丽萍, 杜泽文, 刘强. 交互记忆系统对知识团队绩效作用机制研究——以知识整合为中介变量[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2013, 30(8):132-137.[36] 李随成, 武梦超. 供应商整合能力对渐进式创新与突破式创新的影响——基于环境动态性的调节作用[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2016, 33(3):96-102.[37] 陆亚东. 中国管理学理论研究的窘境与未来[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2015(3):3-15.[38] 岳金桂, 于叶. 技术创新动态能力与技术商业化绩效关系研究——环境动态性的调节作用[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2019, 36(10):91-98.[39] 王涛, 张雁, 李姝. 管理认知对企业能力构建的影响[J]. 经济管理, 2012(3):179-188.[40] 吕洁, 张钢. 团队认知的涌现：基于集体信息加工的视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2013 (12):2214-2223.[41] 高洋, 葛宝山, 蒋大可. 组织学习、惯例更新与竞争优势之间的关系——基于不同环境不确定水平的研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2017，36(9):1386-1395.[42] WILHELM H, SCHLMER M, MAURER I. How dynamic capabilities affect the effectiveness and efficiency of operating routines under high and low levels of environmental dynamism[J]. British Journal of Management, 2015, 26(2):327-345.
