市场学习、创新方式与企业多维绩效关系研究

doi:10.6049/kjjbydc.2016080447

科技进步与对策

2017, Vol. 34

Issue (7): 68-75 DOI: 10.6049/kjjbydc.2016080447

企业创新管理

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

市场学习、创新方式与企业多维绩效关系研究

韩晨,高山行

西安交通大学管理学院，陕西西安 710049

Research on the Relationship among Market Learning,Innovation Mode and Firm Performance

Han Chen, Gao Shanxing

School of Management, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710049, China

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (1258 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要探讨了探索性和应用性市场学习、突破式和渐进式创新与企业效率和效果绩效之间的差异化关系。基于303家中国企业双份调研数据的实证研究发现：渐进式创新正向促进突破式创新，并受竞争战略独特性正向调节；探索性市场学习比应用性市场学习更有助于促进突破式创新，而应用性市场学习比探索性市场学习更有助于促进渐进式创新；两种市场学习交互正向影响突破式和渐进式创新，但对突破式创新的影响更强；突破式创新比渐进式创新对绩效效率与效果两方面的提升都更大。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	韩晨
	高山行

关键词 ：探索性市场学习, 应用性市场学习, 突破式创新, 渐进式创新, 竞争战略, 效率, 效果

收稿日期: 2016-09-29

ZTFLH:

F273.1

基金资助:国家自然科学基金项目（71172187）；国家社会科学基金重大项目（11&ZD170）；陕西省自然科学基础研究项目（2016JQ7002）

通讯作者: 韩晨

作者简介: 韩晨（1989-），女，陕西户县人，西安交通大学管理学院博士研究生，研究方向为技术创新与创业；高山行（1963-），男，陕西兴平人，博士，西安交通大学管理学院教授、博士生导师，研究方向为知识产权管理、技术竞争。

引用本文:

韩晨,高山行. 市场学习、创新方式与企业多维绩效关系研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2017, 34(7): 68-75.
Han Chen, Gao Shanxing. Research on the Relationship among Market Learning,Innovation Mode and Firm Performance. SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY PROGRESS AND POLICY, 2017, 34(7): 68-75.

链接本文:

http://www.kjjb.org/CN/10.6049/kjjbydc.2016080447 或 http://www.kjjb.org/CN/Y2017/V34/I7/68

［1］SHAFIQUE M. Thinking inside the box? intellectual structure of the knowledge base of innovation research (1988-2008) ［J］. Strategic Management Journal, 2013, 34(1): 62-93.
［2］BENNER M J, TUSHMAN M L. Reflections on the 2013 decade award——"exploitation, exploration, and process management: the productivity dilemma revisited" ten years later ［J］. Academy of Management Review, 2015, 40(4): 497-514.
［3］邵福泽, 周伟. 开放式创新、战略柔性与创新绩效——一个交互相互模型［J］. 科技进步与对策, 2016, 33(9): 1-7.
［4］DAMANPOUR F. Organization innovation: a meta-analysis of effects of determinats and moderators ［J］. Academy of Management Journal, 1991, 34(3): 555-591.
［5］CROSSAN M M, APAYDIN M. A multi-dimensional framework of organizational innovation: a systematic review of the literature ［J］. Journal of Management Studies, 2010,47(6):1154-1191.
［6］郑兵云, 李邃. 竞争战略、创新选择与企业绩效［J］. 科研管理, 2011,32(4): 59-68.
［7］CHILD J. Managerial and organizational factors associated with company performance——part II. a contingency analysis ［J］. Journal of Management Studies, 1975,12(1):12-27.
［8］ZHANG H, WU F, CUI A S. Balancing market exploration and market exploitation in product innovation: a contingency perspective ［J］. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 2015,32(3):297-308.
［9］KYRIAKOPOULOS K, MOORMAN C. Exploitative vs. exploratory market learning and new product outcomes ［J］. American Marketing Association, 1998（9）:28-33.
［10］KIM N, ATUAHENE-GIMA K. Using exploratory and exploitative market learning for new product development ［J］. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2010, 27(4)：519-536.
［11］OKE A. Innovation types and innovation management practices in service companies ［J］. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 2007, 27(6): 564-587.
［12］AUH S, MENGUC B. Balancing exploration and exploitation: the moderating role of competitive intensity ［J］. Journal of Business Research, 2005, 58(12): 1652-1661.
［13］MENGUC B, AUH S. The asymmetric moderating role of market orientation on the ambidexterity——firm performance relationship for prospectors and defenders ［J］. Industrial Marketing Management, 2008, 37(4): 455-470.
［14］OSTROFF C, SCHMITT N. Configurations of organizational effectiveness and efficiency ［J］. Academy of Management Journal, 1993, 36(6): 1345-1361.
［15］LEVINTHAL D, MARCH J. The myopia of learning ［J］. Strategic Management Journal, 1993, 14(s2):95-112.
［16］RITALA P, HURMELINNA-LAUKKANEN P. Incremental and radical innovation in coopetition——the role of absorptive capacity and appropriability ［J］. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2013, 30(1): 154-169.
［17］GUPTA A, SMITH K, SHALLEY C. The interplay between exploration and exploitation ［J］. Academy of Management Journal, 2006, 49(4): 693-706.
［18］O'REILLY C A, TUSHMAN M L. Organizational ambidexterity: past, present, and future ［J］. Academy of Management Perspectives, 2013, 27(4): 324-338.
［19］YANG H, ZHENG Y, ZHAO X. Exploration or exploitation? small firms' alliance strategies with large firms ［J］. Strategic Management Journal, 2014, 35(1): 146-157.
［20］KAMMERLANDER N, BURGER D, FUST A, et al. Exploration and exploitation in established small and medium-sized enterprises: the effect of CEOs' regulatory focus ［J］. Journal of Business Venturing, 2015, 30(4): 582-602.
［21］CAO Q, GEDAJLOVIC E, ZHANG H. Unpacking organizational ambidexterity: dimensions, contingencies, and synergistic effects ［J］. Organization Science, 2009, 20(4): 781-796.
［22］BIERLY III P, DAMANPOUR F, SANTORO M. The application of external knowledge: organizational conditions for exploration and exploitation ［J］. Journal of Management Studies, 2009, 46(3): 481-509.
［23］ZAHRA S, GEORGE G. Absorptive capacity: a review, reconceptualization, and extension［J］. Academy of Management Review, 2002, 27(2): 185-203.
［24］李俊华. 双元性理论视阈中技术学习的双因素测度模型研究［J］. 科技进步与对策, 2015, 32(5): 10-14.
［25］MORRIS M, SCHINDEHUTTE M, RICHARDSON J, et al. Is the business model a useful strategic concept? conceptual, theoretical, and empirical insights ［J］. Journal of small Business Strategy, 2006, 17(1): 27-50.
［26］LEWIN A, MINTON J. Determing organizational effectiveness: another look, and an agenda for research ［J］. Management Science, 1986, 32(5): 514-538.
［27］WONG W P, SOH K L, CHONG C L, et al. Logistics firms performance: efficiency and effectiveness perspectives ［J］. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 2015, 64(5): 686-701.
［28］MA'AYAN Y, CARMELI A. Internal audits as a source of ethical behavior, efficiency, and effectiveness in work units ［J］. Journal of Business Ethics, 2015, 137(2): 347-363.
［29］LAVIE D, STETTNER U, TUSHMAN M L. Exploration and exploitation within and across organizations ［J］. The Academy of Management Annals, 2010, 4(1): 109-155.
［30］DE LUCA L M, ATUAHENE-GIMA K. Market knowledge dimensions and cross-functional collaboration: examining the different routes to product innovation performance ［J］. Journal of Marketing, 2007, 71(1): 95-112.
［31］TIDD J, BESSANT J. Strategic innovation management ［M］. New York：John Wiley & Sons, 2014. ［32］WIDHIARSO W, RAVAND H. Estimating reliability coefficient for multidimensional measures: a pedagogical illustration ［J］. Review of Psychology, 2014, 21(2): 111-121.
［33］STEVENS J P. Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences（fourth edition）［M］. London：Routledge, 2012. ［34］O'BRIEN R M. A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors ［J］. Quality & Quantity, 2007, 41(5): 673-690.