团队领导跨界行为对团队创造力的影响机理：知识管理视角

doi:10.6049/kjjbydc.2016050697

科技进步与对策

2017, Vol. 34

Issue (3): 140-146 DOI: 10.6049/kjjbydc.2016050697

人才与教育

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

团队领导跨界行为对团队创造力的影响机理：知识管理视角

王艳子¹,白丽莎²,李倩²

1.山西大学管理与决策研究所；2.山西大学经济与管理学院，山西太原 030006

The Influence of Team Leader's Boundary Spanning Behavior on Team Creativity: A Perspective of Knowledge Management

Wang Yanzi¹,Bai Lisha²,Li Qian²

1.Institute of Management and Decision, Shanxi University;2.School of Economics and Management, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (1159 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要基于知识管理视角，以知识搜索为中介变量，知识内隐性为调节变量，构建了团队领导跨界行为对团队创造力的影响机理模型。通过对110位研发团队领导的调研数据进行统计分析，发现团队领导跨界行为的3个维度（使节行为、协调行为和侦测行为）正向影响团队创造力；知识搜索在团队领导使节行为、协调行为、侦测行为与团队创造力之间起完全中介作用；知识内隐性在知识搜索与团队创造力之间存在负向调节作用。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	王艳子
	白丽莎
	李倩

关键词 ：团队领导跨界行为, 知识搜索, 知识管理, 知识内隐性, 团队创造力

收稿日期: 2016-07-12

ZTFLH:

F272.90

基金资助:教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目（14YJC630132）；山西省高等学校哲学社会科学研究项目（2016204）

通讯作者: 王艳子

作者简介: 王艳子（1983-），男，山西吕梁人，博士，山西大学管理与决策研究所讲师、硕士生导师，研究方向为人力资源管理；白丽莎（1991-），女，山西吕梁人，山西大学经济与管理学院硕士研究生，研究方向为人力资源管理；李倩（1983-），女，山西长治人，博士，山西大学经济与管理学院讲师、硕士生导师，研究方向为知识管理。

引用本文:

王艳子,白丽莎,李倩. 团队领导跨界行为对团队创造力的影响机理：知识管理视角[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2017, 34(3): 140-146.
Wang Yanzi,Bai Lisha,Li Qian. The Influence of Team Leader's Boundary Spanning Behavior on Team Creativity: A Perspective of Knowledge Management. SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY PROGRESS AND POLICY, 2017, 34(3): 140-146.

链接本文:

http://www.kjjb.org/CN/10.6049/kjjbydc.2016050697 或 http://www.kjjb.org/CN/Y2017/V34/I3/140

［1］ANCONA D G.Outward bound:strategies for team survival in organizations［J］.Academy of Management Journal,1990,33(2):334-365.
［2］奉小斌.研发团队跨界行为对创新绩效的影响——任务复杂性的调节作用［J］.研究与发展管理,2012,24(3):56-65.
［3］刘松博,李育辉.员工跨界行为的作用机制:网络中心性和集体主义的作用［J］.心理学报,2014,46(6):852-863.
［4］DRUSKAT V U,WHEELER J V.Managing from the boundary:the effective leadership of self-managing work teams［J］.Academy of Management Journal,2003,46(4):435-457.
［5］OLIVER C.Determinants of interorganizational relationships：integration and future directions［J］.Academy of Management Review,1990,15(2):241-265.
［6］尹义省.适度多角化—企业成长与业务重组［M］.北京:三联书店,1999:19-22.
［7］薛会娟.国外团队跨界行为研究回顾与展望［J］.外国经济与管理,2010,32(9):10-15.
［8］ROSENKOPF L,NERKAR A.Beyond local search:boundary-spanning,exploration,and impact in the optical disk industry ［J］.Strategic Management Journal,2001,22(4):287-306.
［9］ANCONA D G,CALDWELL D F.Demography and design:predictors of new product team performance ［J］.Organization Science,1992,3(3):321-341.
［10］EVAN W M.Toward a theory of inter-organizational relations［J］.Management Science,1965,11(10):217-230.
［11］PAYNE A,CHRISTOPHER M,CLARK M,et al.Relationship marketing for competitive advantage［J］.Oxford:Butterworth-Heinemann,1995(5)：54-68.
［12］王黎萤,陈劲.研发团队创造力的影响机制研究:以团队共享心智模型为中介［J］.科学学研究,2010,28(3):47-56.
［13］MARRONE J A.Team boundary spanning:a multilevel review of past research and proposals for the future［J］.Journal of Management,2010,36(4):911-940.
［14］FLEMING L,WAGUESPACK D M.Brokerage,boundary spanning and leadership in open innovation communities［J］.Organization Science,2007,18(2):165-180.
［15］王艳子，罗瑾琏，常涛.团队领导的社会网络连带对团队创造力的影响机理研究［J］.科学学与科学技术管理,2014,35(8):144-151.
［16］LEVIN I M.Facilitating quality improvement team performance:a development perspective ［J］.Total Quality Management,1992,3(3):307-322.
［17］BURT R.Brokerage and closure:an introduction to social capital［M］.London:Oxford University Press,2005：159-197.
［18］JOSHI A,PANDEY N,HAN G H.Bracketing team boundary spanning:an examination of task-based,team level and contextual antecedents［J］.Journal of Organizational Behavior,2009,30(6):731-759.
［19］MUMFORD M D,WHETZEL D L,REITER-PALMON R.Thinking creatively at work:organizational influences on creative problem-solving［J］.Journal of Creative Behavior,1997,31(1):7-17.
［20］BRESMAN H.External learning activities and team performance:a multi-method field study［J］.Organization Science,2010,21(1):81-96.
［21］KATILA R,AHUJA G.Something old,something new:a longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction［J］.Academy of Management Journal,2002,45(6):1183-1194.
［22］HUANG J W,LI YH.Slack resources in team learning and project performance［J］.Journal of Business Research,2012,65(3):381-388.
［23］MARCH J G.Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning［J］.Organization Science,1991,2(1):71-87.
［24］SOFKA W,GRIMPE C.Specialized search and innovation performance——evidence across Europe［J］.R&D Management,2010,40(3):310-323.
［25］LAURSEN K,SALTER A.Open for innovation:the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K.manufacturing firms［J］.Strategic Management Journal,2006,27(2):131-150.
［26］DAVENPORT T H,PRUSAK L.Working knowledge:how organizations manage what they know［M］.Boston:Harvard Business School Press,1998：167-198.
［27］EISENHARDT K M,TABRIZI B N.Accelerating adaptive processes:product innovation in the global computer industry［J］.Administrative Science Quarterly,1995,40(1):84-110.
［28］KOKA B R,PRESCOTT J E.Designing alliance networks:the influence of network position,environmental change,and strategy on firm performance［J］.Strategic Management Journal,2008,29(6):639-661.
［29］高鹏.隐性知识学习与企业创新研究［D］.西安：西北大学,2012：43-44.
［30］SPENDER J C.Some frontier activities around strategy theorizing［J］.Journal of Management Studies,1993,30(1):11-30.
［31］PAUL S,PETER T.Social factors of work environment creativity［J］.Journal of Business and Psychology,2007,21(3):407-428.
［32］肖久灵,汪建康,孙文祥.知识内隐性与国际进入模式选择研究［J］.科技进步与对策,2009,26(22):156-159.
［33］ZANDER U,KOGUT B.Knowledge and the speed of the transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities：an empirical test［J］.Organization Science,1995,6(1):76-92.
［34］HANSEN M.The research transfer problem：the role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization ［J］.Administrative Science Quarterly,1999,44(1):82-111.
［35］HANKE R M.Team creativity:a process model［D］.Pennsylvania:The Pennsylvania State University,2006.