|
|
|
| Compatibility of Policy Objectives and Policy Tools about China's Chip Industry Policy: An Analysis Based on Text Quantification |
| Yang Kairui1,2,Ban Ang1,Shi Ke1,Shi Weijie3 |
| (1.School of Public Administration, Henan University of Economics and Law, Zhengzhou 450046, China;2.Hebi Industrial Technology Research Institute, Hebi 458000, China;3.MCC CCID Electrical Technology Co., Ltd, Beijing 100176,China) |
|
|
|
|
Abstract As the heart of electronic devices, chips are vital for developing the information industry.The development of chip industry plays a fundamental, strategic and pioneering role in the modern industrial system, and it is also a crucial element in international competitiveness.In recent years, the United States has placed severe restrictions on the global supply of chips to China; in response, the Chinese government has introduced a wide range of public policies to direct social capital into chip technology and the industry in order to facilitate the growth of the chip industry.For academic research, it is important to clarify what the objectives of China's chip industry policies are and whether the current national policy tools can effectively support the realization of the objectives to improve China's chip policy system and promote the growth of China's chip industry.Therefore, this paper examines the compatibility of China's chip industry policy objectives and policy tools on the basis of a thorough analysis of the country's existing chip industry policies in order to provide useful references and lessons for the optimization of China's chip industry policy system.#br#From the perspective of enhancing the driving force of China's chip scientific and technological innovation and accelerating the promotion of scientific and technological innovation and industrial transformation, the paper takes texts of the chip industrial development policies issued by the central government from 1978 to 2020 as the research object, and conducts policy mining and quantitative analysis within the framework of policy "objective-tool".Specifically, in order to confirm the credibility and validity of the coded results, cross-check is done after the independent coding.The policy objectives and policy tools are extracted and counted separately for the in-depth study and cross-analysis to explore how well they match and the following implications.#br#The results show that in terms of policy objectives, the Chinese government focuses on application innovation to actively promote the integration of chip technology and economic society, but pays less attention to basic research; in terms of policy tools, the Chinese government mostly uses supply-side policy tools to satisfy the supply of production factors and the guarantee of external environment, but demand tools are relatively scarce.In addition, China's chip policy objectives are less specific and operational, and there is a mismatch between the number and structure of objectives and tools.Finally, the paper explores the reasons and logic behind, and finds that the features of the "objective-tool" match of China's chip industry policy are, to some extent, a reflection of the national political institutional structure, technology development plan and industrial development philosophy.The government is expected to accelerate the improvement of the overall layout of basic research and achieve breakthroughs in core cutting-edge technologies, continuously optimize the internal structure of policy tools and effectively play a demand-driven role; moreover, in order to strengthen the accuracy of policy tools, it is essential to improve the operability of policy objectives.#br#This paper develops a two-dimensional "objective-tool" analysis framework from the perspective of innovation dynamics, and conducts a multi-dimensional cross-correlation study on China's chip industry policies, which makes up for the deficiencies of related studies that have less theoretical structure design and often concentrate on a single dimension without cross-correlation analysis, and further enriches the theoretical and empirical research in this field.However, there are some limitations in this paper, and they require more in-depth research.(1) In terms of research dimension, there is a dearth of examination of the change in the matching degree of objectives and tools in the time dimension.Subsequent studies might attempt to analyze the compatibility status in stages and explore its changing pattern and internal logic.(2) In terms of research scope, this study only focuses on the national-level policies affecting China's chip industry, but few local or regional policies are included.Further research on how the objectives and tools of local or regional policies align can be explored.#br#
|
|
Received: 23 November 2022
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 刘晓燕,李金鹏,单晓红,等. 动态视角下集成电路产业创新网络演化特征分析[J].中国科技论坛,2019,35(11):48-55.
[2] 刘碧莹,任声策. 中国半导体产业的技术追赶路径——基于领先企业的经验对比研究[J].科技管理研究,2020,40(11):82-90.
[3] 杨巧云,乔迎迎,梁诗露. 基于政策“目标—工具”匹配视角的省级政府数字经济政策研究[J].经济体制改革,2021,39(3):193-200.
[4] 范梓腾,谭海波. 地方政府大数据发展政策的文献量化研究——基于政策“目标—工具”匹配的视角[J].中国行政管理,2017,33(12):46-53.
[5] 周观平,易宇. 新发展格局下提升中国集成电路产业链安全可控水平研究[J].宏观经济研究,2021,43(11):58-69.
[6] 王晓红,郭霞. 新冠疫情后我国产业链外移及产业链竞争力研究——以集成电路产业链为例[J].国际贸易,2020,39(11):18-27.
[7] 汤志伟,雷鸿竹,周维. 中美人工智能产业政策的比较研究——基于目标、工具与执行的内容分析[J].情报杂志,2019,38(10):73-80.
[8] 刘雯,马晓辉,刘武. 中国大陆集成电路产业发展态势与建议[J].中国软科学,2015,30(11):186-192.
[9] 中国政府网.李克强:“卡脖子”问题根子在基础研究薄弱[EB/OL].(2019-09-04) [2022-03-23]. http://www.gov.cn/guowuyuan/2019-09/04/content_5427011.htm.
[10] 王龙伟,李垣,刘益. 信息交流、组织能力与产品创新的关系研究[J].研究与发展管理,2006,18(4):8-14.
[11] 吕志奎.公共政策工具的选择——政策执行研究的新视角[J].太平洋学报,2006,14(5):7-16.
[12] 焦石文.改革开放以来中国政府治理方式的变迁[J].理论与改革,2018,31(6):103-111.
[13] 耿旭,喻君瑶.政策工具一定会服务于政策目标吗——基于23份省级主体功能区政策文本的分析[J].甘肃行政学院学报,2018, 27(6):39-47,127.
[14] 谢富胜,潘忆眉.正确认识社会主义市场经济条件下的新型举国体制[J].马克思主义与现实,2020,31(5):156-166,204.
[15] 赵昌文,蒋希蘅,江宇,等.中国共产党为什么能够成功——百年大党领导经济社会发展的基本经验[J].经济社会体制比较,2022,38(3):1-10.
[16] 梁华.完善新型举国体制的四点思路[J].理论探索,2022,39(5):96-102.
[17] 闫振坤.中国产业政策的两种模式与转换取向[J].江汉论坛,2017,60(1):37-42.
[18] 唐曼,王刚.行为模仿:地方政府行为的一个分析框架——基于多案例的研究[J].公共行政评论,2021,14(3):158-175,200.
[19] TIMMERMANS B,ZABALA-ITURRIAGAGOITIA J M.Coordinated unbundling: a way to stimulate entrepreneurship through public procurement for innovation[J]. Science & Public Policy, 2013,40(5):674-685.
|
|
|
|
