|
|
|
| The Theoretical Logic and Practice Path of Context-driven Agricultural Whole Industry Chain Innovation |
| Tang Xin1,Xu Yongbin2 |
| (1. Business School, Hunan institute of technology, Hengyang 421002, China;2. School of Accounting, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou 310018, China) |
|
|
|
|
Abstract With the deepening embedding of the digital economy in rural revitalization in recent years, data has become a new production factor and an important innovation driving force, as well as a core element in rural construction and agricultural development. In the digital economy, various contexts and tracks keep emerging, and it can be considered that the agricultural whole industry chain is gradually entering the context era. Therefore, it is difficult to achieve the complex and comprehensive strategic needs of rural revitalization and common prosperity by only adopting the agricultural innovation development model aiming at a single technology field or market demand, and more attention should be paid to the theoretical research and practical application of context-driven agricultural whole industry chain innovation.#br#This study first explores the element system and theoretical logic of context-driven agricultural whole industry chain innovation based on the definition of agricultural whole industry chain by the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs. The context demand of agricultural whole industry chain innovation against the background of digital economy are analyzed into three dimensions: production, marketing and service. Second, the practical path of context-driven agricultural whole industry chain innovation is summarized. By analyzing three typical cases of Shunfeng Biotechnology, Adopt a Cow, and Yangjiale, the practical path of context-driven agricultural whole industry chain innovation in the production, marketing, and service dimensions is verified. Finally, the strategic logic of the intersection and integration of the theoretical fields of " context-driven innovation" and "agricultural whole industry chain innovation" is summarized as the context-chain structure of agricultural whole industry chain innovation.#br#The results show that context-driven agricultural whole industry chain innovation needs to rely on four factors: agricultural context demand (antecedent factor), high-energy innovation consortia (main factor), digital innovation platform (digital factor), and diversified context value (consequence factor). The theoretical logic of context-driven agricultural whole industry chain innovation can be summarized as four sections: mission driven which refers to the traction effect of rural revitalization strategy, digital economy background, and customer context demand characteristics; context-driven which refers to context demand-driven effect of three dimensions including production, marketing and service; agricultural whole industry chain innovation process which refers to the process of decoupling and reconstructing various elements on high-level innovation consortia and digital innovation platform into a new value co-creation system, meeting customers' consumption expectations in specific time and space; innovative achievement application which refers to innovative behavior implementation of agricultural whole industry chain in three aspects of production technology, business model and service channel, so as to achieve diversified context value. The practical path of context-driven agricultural whole industry chain innovation includes five steps: context demand analysis, context task design, context-driven innovation resource allocation, agricultural whole industry chain innovative behavior implementation and diversified context value realization. #br#The main contribution with this study is its focus on the theoretical logic and practice path of context-driven agricultural whole industry chain innovation. By analyzing the case studies of three typical enterprises, it exemplifies the practical forms of agricultural whole industry chain innovation driven by the demand for production, marketing, and service context. The analysis results help to construct an overall theoretical framework for context-driven agricultural whole industry chain innovation, making exploratory attempts for the research on national strategic needs, agricultural industry chain development needs, and major market demand context-driven agricultural whole industry chain innovation. The findings provide practical inspiration for strengthening the autonomy, security,and controllability of the agricultural whole industry chain, and building agricultural whole industry chain resilience.#br#In the context-driven era, the innovation of the whole agricultural industry chain focuses on the logic of context-value co-creation. In the future, with the continuous enrichment of context elements and the improvement of their functions, especially with the popularity of technological application, the connotation and extension of context value in the whole agricultural industry chain will continue to extend, and more types of value co-creation logic will be generated to meet customer consumption expectations in a broader spatio-temporal dimension, which helps to achieve the goals of rural revitalization and common prosperity.#br#
|
|
Received: 08 October 2022
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 李国英. 农业全产业链数字化转型的底层逻辑及推进策略[J]. 区域经济评论,2022,10(5):86-93.
[2] 王丽. 智慧农业背景下农业全产业链发展路径探索[J].农业经济,2018,38(4):6-8.
[3] 吴绒,梁琦. 生态约束、大数据嵌入与绿色农业全产业链协同[J].江苏农业科学,2022,50(5) :234-241.
[4] 孙永朋,王美青,徐萍,等. 打造新时代浙江农业全产业链升级版的战略思考[J].农业经济,2021,41(12):3-5.
[5] 尹西明,苏雅欣,陈劲,等.场景驱动的创新:内涵特征、理论逻辑与实践进路[J].科技进步与对策,2022,39(15):1-10.
[6] 陈旭. 互联网+农业场景营销模式创新研究[J].农业经济,2019,39(3):131-133.
[7] 丁熊,白雪晶. 基于场景构建的生鲜农产品新零售服务创新与设计研究[J].包装工程,2019,40(16):92-100.
[8] 张媛.乡村文化振兴下的淘宝“村播计划”场景传播研究[D].重庆:西南大学,2021.
[9] 陈松敏.从国外农业信息化发展经验看我国“5G农业”发展场景[J].农业经济,2022,42(1):27-28.
[10] KENNY D,MARSHALLJ. Contextual marketing: the real business of the Internet[J].Harvard Business Review,2000,78:119-125.
[11] 陈劲,阳镇,朱子钦.新型举国体制的理论逻辑、落地模式与应用场景[J].改革,2021,38(5):1-17.
[12] 尹西明,陈泰伦,陈劲,等.面向科技自立自强的高能级创新联合体建设[J].陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2022,51(2):51-60.
[13] 朱志华.场景驱动创新:科技与经济融合的加速器[J].科技与金融,2021,5(7):63-66.
[14] 钟业喜,吴思雨. 元宇宙赋能数字经济高质量发展:基础、机理、路径与应用场景[J]. 重庆大学学报(社会科学版),2022,28(4):1-12.
[15] 李贝贝. 发展“互联网+农业”促进农业新升级[J]. 农业经济,2019,39(10):14-15.
[16] 田剑英. 农业全产业链融资方式与完善对策——基于浙江省 55 条农业全产业链的调查与跟踪研究[J].经济纵横,2018,34(9):112-121.
[17] 尹西明,苏雅欣,李飞,等. 共同富裕场景驱动科技成果转化的理论逻辑与路径思考[J]. 科技中国,2022,27(8):15-20.
[18] 倪冰莉. “互联网 +”时代农业全产业链发展模式创新[J]. 商业经济研究,2020,39(21):85-88.
[19] 王福,长青,刘俊华,等.新零售商业模式场景化创新的理论框架与实现路径研究[J].技术经济,2021,40(4):39-48.
[20] 江积海,廖芮.商业模式创新中场景价值共创动因及作用机理研究[J].科技进步与对策,2017,34(8):20-28.
[21] 李鸿磊,刘建丽.基于用户体验的商业模式场景研究:价值创造与传递视角[J].外国经济与管理,2020,42(6):20-37.
[22] 董洁林,陈娟.互联网时代制造商如何重塑与用户的关系——基于小米商业模式的案例研究[J].中国软科学,2015,32(8):22-33.
[23] 李高勇,刘露.场景数字化:构建场景驱动的发展模式[J].清华管理评论,2021,11(6):87-91.
[24] 郝金磊,尹萌.分享经济:赋能、价值共创与商业模式创新——基于猪八戒网的案例研究[J]. 商业研究,2019,62(5):31-40.
[25] 邹波,杨晓龙,董彩婷.基于大数据合作资产的数字经济场景化创新[J].北京交通大学学报(社会科学版),2021,20(4):34-43.
[26] 邱均平,文庭孝.评价学:理论,方法,实践[M].北京:科学出版社,2010.
[27] 王重鸣,薛元昊.知识产权创业能力的理论构建与实证分析:基于高技术企业的多案例研究[J].浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版):2014,44(3):58-70.
[28] 胡挺,王继康.我国企业海外并购提升了公司价值吗——以吉利并购沃尔沃为例[J].华东经济管理,2014,28(2):155-159.
[29] EISENHARDT K M.Building theories from case study research[J].Academy of Management Review,1989,14(4):532-550.
[30] 毛基业,苏芳.案例研究的理论贡献——中国企业管理案例与质性研究论坛(2015)综述[J].管理世界,2016,32(2):128-132.
|
|
|
|
