|
|
|
| Measurement and Evolution Analysis of the Integrationand Synergy Development of Technological Innovation and Standardization |
| Zhang Qinqing,Li Changhong,Li Zhiqiang,Guo Jiaqi,Wang Haiyan |
| (School of Economics and Management, Shanxi University, Shanxi Taiyuan 030006, China) |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Technological innovation and standardization signify economic vitality and competitive ability. With the global science and technology revolution and industry changes, technological innovation and standardization are gradually integrated and dependent on each other. The integration and synergy between the two have become the core driving force and important support for the healthy growth of enterprises, the transformation and upgrading of industry, and the high-quality development of the national economy. However, standard innovation resources are limited and personnel quality is uneven, and there are blanks in the trade standards and national standards for some products in high technology field. The monopolistic market behaviors of patent technology standards in developed countries are commonly seen, there is disjunction between enterprise technology innovation system and standardization system, and the urban distribution of national technical standard innovation base is unequal. Practitioners and scholars have expressed their deep concern on the above problems and it is much challenging for Chinese standards to "go global". Therefore, it is essential to promote high-quality economic development by accelerating the integration and synergy of technological innovation and standardization.#br#Then in the process of service dual-cycle development, what is the level of integration and synergy development of technological innovation and standardization in China? Are there regional differences and what is the degree of difference? What are the evolution and convergence characteristics of them? The solutions of these problems are of great significance for the better implementation of the National Standardized Development Outline and the promotion of high-quality development. Throughout the existing literature, it is found that there is a lack of measurement and evolution analysis on the integration and synergy development of technological innovation and standardization at the national, regional and provincial levels. Therefore, on the basis of fully learning from the existing literature, this study employs the data of 30 Chinese provinces from 2009 to 2020, adopts the improved distance collaborative model to measure the integration and synergy development capacity of technological innovation and standardization, and uses the spatial convergence model to test and analyze the integration and synergy development level of technological innovation and standardization, so as to reveal the evolution characteristics and regional differences.#br#The results show that the integration and synergy development level of technological innovation and standardization is on the rise, but its development level is lower than the synergy level. Among the four regions, the eastern region has a strong momentum of integration and synergy development; the integration and synergy development degree of central and western regions fluctuates a bit, and the integration and synergy level of northeast region fluctuates the most, indicating that it needs to be further improved. The integration and synergy development of technological innovation and standardization in different provinces has obvious regional heterogeneity. It shows that the eastern region has a significant advantage, the central region is next, the western and northeastern regions are unbalanced. The differences of the integration and synergy development level of technological innovation and standardization in China and the four regions are characterized by σ convergence, absolute β convergence and conditional β convergence.#br#Accordingly, this paper puts forward the following policy recommendations:improving the efficiency of resource allocation and speeding up the development of technological innovation and standardization, exploring the pilot demonstration and reinforcing the driving forces of the integration and synergy development of technological innovation and standardization, and strengthening policy inclination and accelerating higher level regional coordinated development. Then it is suggested to coordinate comparative advantages of eastern region and promote the integration and synergy development of technological innovation and standardization. Lastly, it is essential to make full use of resource endowment to promote the gradual convergence of the integration and synergy development level of technological innovation and standardization. According to the actual situation of the region, the government should implement scientific technological innovation and standardization policies to realize the integration and synergy of technological innovation and standardization, and promote high-quality economic development.#br#
|
|
Received: 22 March 2022
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] RIILLO C A F. Standards and innovation: what relationships? a literature review [C]. 14th Annual Standardization Conference "Standardization and Corporate Inteligence" Euras 2009 Conference, Cergy-Pontoise, France, 2009.
[2] 钱学森. 标准化和标准学研究[J]. 标准化通讯, 1979,22(3): 12-13.
[3] 干勇, 尹伟伦, 王海舟, 等. 支撑高质量发展的标准体系战略研究[J]. 中国工程科学, 2021, 23(3): 1-7.
[4] 张琴清, 李志强, 李常洪, 等. 技术创新和标准化的融合框架研究:基于供给侧结构性改革视角[J]. 科学决策, 2021,28(4): 95-111.
[5] 标准创新管理司标准应用管理处. 国家技术标准创新基地: 以标准化助力高技术创新,促进高水平开放, 引领高质量发展[J]. 中国标准化, 2021,64(19): 18-19.
[6] 吕铁. 论技术标准化与产业标准战略[J]. 中国工业经济, 2005,23(7): 43-49.
[7] 李新波, 韩伯棠, 王宗赐. 标准化与技术创新规模和速度的关系研究[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2010, 31(11): 40-44.
[8] 宋刚. 钱学森开放复杂巨系统理论视角下的科技创新体系——以城市管理科技创新体系构建为例[J]. 科学管理研究,2009, 27(6): 1-6.
[9] 陈春晖, 曾德明, 彭盾. 协调技术标准化与技术创新共同推进自主创新能力跨越式提升[J]. 软科学, 2007, 21(5): 97-101.
[10] 程如烟, 罗晖. 制定国家标准化战略抢夺标准控制权——对《世界主要国家的标准化战略》报告的述评[J]. 中国软科学, 2007,22(7): 158-160.
[11] 华鹰. 企业技术创新中的技术标准战略——以专利与技术标准相结合为视角[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2009,25(10): 40-43.
[12] 舒辉, 卫春丽. 自主创新与技术标准融合协同机制研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2013, 30(15): 19-24.
[13] FEATHERSTON C R, HO J-Y, BRéVIGNON-DODIN L, et al. Mediating and catalyzing innovation: a framework for anticipating the standardization needs of emerging technologies[J]. Technovation, 2016, 48-49(11): 25-40.
[14] HO J-Y, O′SULLIVAN E. Standardisation framework to enable complex technological innovations: the case of photovoltaic technology[J]. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 2018, 50: 2-23.
[15] 程军, 王彬彬, 梁静, 等. 标准、专利、技术创新的联动模式及实证分析[J]. 中国质量与标准导报, 2014,23(11): 29-32.
[16] 万钢. 完善科技创新与技术标准融合机制推动创新成果转化——在全国标准化工作会议上的讲话(摘要)[J]. 中国标准化, 2013,56(3): 17-19.
[17] 麦绿波. 标准学——标准的科学理论[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2019.
[18] 舒辉, 王媛. 市场推进技术创新、专利、标准协同转化路径分析[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2018, 35(12): 57-63.
[19] 蒋明琳, 舒辉, 林晓伟. 政府为主导的技术创新与技术标准协同管理研究[J]. 经济体制改革, 2014,32(6): 102-106.
[20] JIANG H, ZHAO S K, ZHANG Y, et al. The cooperative effect between technology standardization and industrial technology innovation based on Newtonian mechanics [J]. Information Technology and Management, 2012, 13(4): 251-262.
[21] 王道平, 方放, 曾德明. 产业技术标准与企业技术创新关系研究评述[J]. 经济学动态, 2007,48(12): 105-109.
[22] 孙耀吾, 胡林辉, 胡志勇. 技术标准化能力链 :高技术产业技术能力研究新维度[J]. 财经理论与实践, 2007, 28(6): 95-99.
[23] 张果, 郭鹏. 企业技术标准化能力与技术创新能力耦合度测度模型[J]. 管理现代化, 2015, 35(6): 40-42.
[24] 陶忠元, 王晓晴, 薛晨. 技术创新与标准化协同对我国制造业价值链内升级影响的实证研究——以七个细分产业为例[J]. 工业技术经济, 2016, 35(3): 64-72.
[25] 陶忠元, 王艳秀. 技术创新与标准化协同对中国制造业竞争优势的驱动路径研究[J]. 南京财经大学学报, 2019,37(5): 11-22.
[26] 陶忠元, 王艳秀. “中国制造”技术创新与标准化协同程度及其影响因素的实证研究——基于七类细分制造行业[J]. 科技管理研究, 2019, 39(20): 99-106.
[27] 陶忠元, 王艳秀. 技术与标准协同创新对竞争力水平驱动效应分析[J]. 统计与决策, 2020, 36(22): 71-75.
[28] 张欢, 汤尚颖, 耿志润. 长三角城市群宜业与生态宜居融合协同发展水平、动态轨迹及其收敛性[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2019, 36(2): 3-23.
[29] 李海东, 王帅, 刘阳. 基于灰色关联理论和距离协同模型的区域协同发展评价方法及实证[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2014, 34(7): 1749-1755.
[30] 刘思峰, 党耀国, 方志耕, 等. 灰色系统理论及其应用(第五版)[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2010.
|
|
|
|
