|
|
Cooperative Network of Shanghai Enterprise-led Innovation Consortium:An Example of the Projects of the Shaihai Science and Technology Progress Award |
Cao Yougen1,2,Ren Shengce1,Du Mei1 |
(1.Shanghai International College of Intellectual Property, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092,China; 2. Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition, Munich 80539, Germany) |
|
|
Abstract At present the scientific and technological self-reliance and self-improvement are taken as the strategic support for national development, but the existing innovation cooperation modes, such as R&D alliance, research consortium and industry-university-research cooperation, are not only loosely coupled, market-driven and economic interest-oriented, but also difficult to undertake major national missions and ensure the self-reliance and self-improvement of high-level science and technology. The enterprise-led innovation consortium can effectively solve the problems of key technologies and cutting-edge leading technologies, and is an effective way to promote the deep collaboration of industry-university-research and the transformation of scientific and technological innovation achievements. Therefore, it is of great significance to study the enterprise-led innovation consortium.#br#As a new concept, the enterprise-led innovation consortium is still in the exploratory stage.Scholars have conducted preliminary discussions on its basic connotation, dynamic mechanism, construction paths, and performance impacts, but there is rare research on the cooperation trend, structural characteristics and spatio-temporal network evolution of the enterprise-led innovation consortium. In view of this, this paper focuses on the following two research questions:What are the structural characteristics and evolution of the cooperation network of the enterprise-led innovation consortium? What are the spatial and organizational characteristics of innovation entities in the cooperation network of enterprise-led innovation consortium?#br#According to the projects of the Shanghai Science and Technology Progress Award from 2006 to 2020, this paper divides it into three stages according to the trends of enterprise-led innovation consortium. First, this paper uses social network analysis methods to analyze the structural characteristics and its evolution of the cooperation network of enterprise-led innovation consortium. Then, it analyzes the spatial distribution and organizational characteristics of innovation entities in the cooperation network of enterprise-led innovation consortium from the node attribute level.#br#The research results show that the network scale continues to grow from the first stage to the third stage, and the network evolves towards a more developed and connected direction; the number of core innovative entities is increasing, and their status is becoming more prominent; traditional fields such as electricity and construction have developed the ultra-large enterprise-led innovation consortia; the spatial distribution of innovative entities in the cooperation network shows obvious stage characteristics, and gradually forms a "hexagonal" regional cooperative network, but each region has different influences in regional cooperation; enterprise-university and enterprise-enterprise are the main cooperative modes in the cooperative network of the enterprise-led innovation consortium.#br#On the basis of the above conclusions, the study presents the following practical insights. First, the analysis of the cooperation network trend and structural characteristics' evolution of enterprise-led innovation consortium provides the overall layout of Shanghai enterprise-led innovation consortium cooperation. Second, in the evolution of the cooperation network of enterprise-led innovation consortium in Shanghai, the phenomenon of agglomeration and imbalance around certain large nodes, and the decrease in the degree of cooperation between innovation entities due to rapid expansion, etc. require the government to maintain a dynamic balance between the stability and expansion of innovation entities. Third, the regional cooperation of enterprise-led innovation consortium in Shanghai has formed a "hexagonal" network with Shanghai as the center and east, northeast, southeast, central, northwest and southwest as the fulcrums, but each fulcrum plays a different role. Shanghai should strengthen the inter-regional exchanges to form a differentiated cross-regional cooperation network of enterprise-led innovation consortium based on its own advantages. Fourth, the Shanghai enterprise-led innovation consortium mainly relies on enterprises, especially large leading enterprises, to carry out joint research activities, and the participation proportion of scientific research institutes needs to be improved. Meanwhile, among the existing innovative cooperation modes, the "enterprise-university-institute-government" cooperation mode needs to be strengthened.#br#
|
Received: 25 July 2022
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 尹西明, 陈劲, 贾宝余. 高水平科技自立自强视角下国家战略科技力量的突出特征与强化路径[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2021, 37(9): 1-9. [2] 陈劲, 尹西明. 中国科技创新与发展2035展望[J]. 科学与管理, 2019, 39(1): 1-7. [3] 尹西明, 陈泰伦, 陈劲, 等. 面向科技自立自强的高能级创新联合体建设[J]. 陕西师范大学学报 (哲学社会科学版), 2022, 51(2): 51-60. [4] 郭菊娥, 王梦迪, 冷奥琳. 企业布局搭建创新联合体重塑创新生态的机理与路径研究[J].西安交通大学学报 (社会科学版), 2022, 42(1): 76-84. [5] 白京羽, 刘中全, 王颖婕. 基于博弈论的创新联合体动力机制研究[J]. 科研管理, 2020, 41(10): 105-113. [6] 张赤东, 彭晓艺. 创新联合体的概念界定与政策内涵[J]. 科技中国, 2021, 26(6): 5-9. [7] 曹纯斌, 赵琦. 创新联合体组建路径与推进模式探析[J]. 科技中国, 2022, 27(3): 26-29. [8] 朱国军, 王修齐, 张宏远. 智能制造核心企业如何牵头组建创新联合体——来自华为智能汽车业务的探索性案例研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2022, 39(19): 12-19. [9] 张羽飞, 原长弘, 张树满. 共建产学研创新联合体对科技中小企业创新绩效的影响研究[J/OL]. 管理学报: 1-10[2022-09-30]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/42.1725.c.20220713.1556.020.html. [10] ANSOFF H I. Corporate strategy: an analytic approach to business policy for growth and expansion[M]. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies, 1965. [11] GLOOR P A. Swarm creativity: competitive advantage through collaborative innovation networks[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006. [12] BAI Y P, O'BRIEN G C. The strategic motives behind firm's engagement in cooperative research and development: a new explanation from four theoretical perspectives[J]. Journal of Modelling in Management, 2008, 3(2): 162-181. [13] LHUILLERY S, PFISTER E. R&D cooperation and failures in innovation projects: empirical evidence from French CIS data[J]. Research Policy, 2009, 38(1): 45-57. [14] VONORTAS N S. Research joint ventures in the US[J]. Research Policy, 1997, 26(4/5): 577-595. [15] 王怡, 武博. 研究联合体的概念界定与优势分析[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2011, 28(7): 20-25. [16] KAMIEN M I, MULLER E, ZANG I. Research joint ventures and R&D cartels[J]. The American Economic Review, 1992, 82(5): 1293-1306. [17] LEE S H, MUMINOV T K. R&D Information sharing in a mixed duopoly and incentive subsidy for research joint venture competition[J]. Bulletin of Economic Research, 2021, 73(2): 154-170. [18] NIPPA M, REUER J J. On the future of international joint venture research[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 2019, 50(4): 555-597. [19] 马宗国. 研究联合体研发创新绩效评价及发展对策研究[J]. 科学管理研究, 2014, 32(1): 55-58. [20] 吕薇, 马名杰, 戴建军, 等. 转型期我国创新发展的现状、问题及政策建议[J]. 中国软科学, 2018, 31(3): 10-17. [21] 刘戒骄, 方莹莹, 王文娜. 科技创新新型举国体制: 实践逻辑与关键要义[J]. 北京工业大学学报 (社会科学版), 2021, 21(5): 89-101. [22] 张仁开. 上海支持企业牵头组建创新联合体的思路及建议[J]. 科技中国, 2022, 27(5): 12-16. [23] 熊鸿儒. 我国产学研深度融合的短板和挑战在哪里[J]. 学习与探索, 2021, 43(5): 126-133,192. [24] 韩增林, 袁莹莹, 彭飞. 东北地区装备制造业官产学创新合作网络发展演变[J]. 经济地理, 2018, 38(1): 103-111. [25] 刘军. 社会网络分析导论[M]. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2004. [26] MAYHEW B H, LEVINGER R L. Size and the density of interaction in human aggregates[J]. American Journal of Sociology, 1976, 82(1): 86-110.
|
|
|
|