|
|
|
| R&D Double Cycle Spillover, Value Chain Climbing and Manufacturing Technology Transition:Empirical Evidence from 2008-2020 |
| Song Wei,He Jiyang,Zhou Yong,Dong mingfang |
| (School of Management, Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi'an 710055, China) |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Since the reform and opening up, China's manufacturing industry has transformed from a follower to a counterpart of those in the developed countries in the process of technology imitation and equipment introduction by using large-caliber international circulation, and has realized the catch-up of technology. The "zigzag lead" between China and the United States has broken the previous US-led global value chain system. With the continuous escalation of trade frictions between China and the United States, the supply side of R&D spillovers is blocked. The "supply decoupling" of key and core technologies and the "chain decoupling" of global industrial transfer have further increased the risk of anti-globalization, and the marginal contribution of using international circulation to promote the technological leap of China's manufacturing industry is increasingly weak. The shift from "spillover inside" to "internal and external spillovers" has become an important support for the transformation to a manufacturing power under the new development pattern. It is urgent to verify if the traditional R&D international circulation spillover will help the manufacturing industry break through the R&D obstacles, and under the new development pattern, what kind of R&D spillovers China's manufacturing industry has to effectively promote the technology leap of manufacturing industry, and then move forward to a manufacturing power.#br#The climbing of the value chain is an important guarantee for unblocking the R&D spillover channels, promoting the transformation of the national value chain to the global value chain, and realizing the technological leap of manufacturing industry by building a R&D system centered on China's manufacturing industry. Strengthening and expanding the regional and local effects of R&D spillovers has become the only way for China's manufacturing industry to use R&D spillovers to drive up the global value chain, and realize the technological leap of manufacturing industry. Especially since the outbreak of the financial crisis in 2008, the accelerated return of manufacturing industries in major developed countries has impeded the international R&D circulation spillover. According to the development pattern of global and regional innovation , the domestic and international R&D circulation spillovers have entered a rebalancing state in the framework of big cycle. This rebalancing state determines the embedding position and climbing height of manufacturing industry in the global value chain, and the R&D double-cycle spillover and value chain climbing are the decisive factors affecting the technological leap of China's manufacturing industry.#br#On the basis of the existing literature and the panel data of China's manufacturing industry from 2008 to 2020, this paper estimates the effects of R&D double-cycle spillovers and value chain climbing on the technological transition of manufacturing industry. The results show that with the comprehensive expansion of intelligent capital in new technology fields such as artificial intelligence and big data, the low adaptability of supply and demand caused by the continuous iteration of new demand makes the positive effect of R&D double-cycle spillover on the technological transition of manufacturing industry insignificant.By further incorporating the value chain climb, it is found that the R&D double-cycle spillover characterized by "zigzag leading" reduces the risk of "chain break" and "supply break" in China's manufacturing industry; it improves the added value and competitiveness of the manufacturing industry, promotes the extension of China's manufacturing industry to both ends of the global value chain, and has a significant positive effect on the technological leap of the manufacturing industry. #br#Compared with the existing literature, the contribution of this paper is mainly reflected in two aspects. First, considering that different types of R&D spillovers have significant differences in the technological transition of manufacturing industry, this paper examines the mechanism of R&D double-cycle spillovers affecting the technological transition of manufacturing industry on the basis of distinguishing different R&D spillover channels under the new development pattern. Secondly, starting from the rebalancing state in the framework of the R&D big cycle, it introduces the value chain climbing into the model, and makes a deep investigation of the dynamic mechanism of the R&D double cycle spillover and the value chain climbing on the manufacturing technology transition.#br#
|
|
Received: 11 July 2022
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 蔡昉.生产率、新动能与制造业——中国经济如何提高资源重新配置效率[J].中国工业经济,2021,38(5):5-18.
[2] 李林,杨承川,何建洪.我国先进制造企业技术赶超中的技术能力阶段性跃迁研究[J].管理学报,2021,18(1):79-90.
[3] 董景荣,张文卿.技术来源、技术进步偏向与中国制造业升级——基于双循环新发展格局的思考[J].中国科技论坛,2021,37(10):71-82.
[4] MCMILLAN M, RODRIK D, VERDUZCO-GALLO. Globalization, structural change, and productivity growth, with an update on Africa[J]. World Development, 2014, 63: 11-32.
[5] 吴哲,范彦成,陈衍泰,等.新兴经济体对外直接投资的逆向知识溢出效应——中国对“一带一路”国家OFDI的实证检验[J].中国管理科学,2015,23(S1):690-695.
[6] 盛斌,赵文涛.地区全球价值链、市场分割与产业升级——基于空间溢出视角的分析[J].财贸经济, 2020,41(9):131-145.
[7] CHANG C L, ROBIN S. Doing R&D and/or importing technologies: the critical importance of firm size in Taiwan's manufacturing industries[J]. Review of Industrial Organization, 2006, 29(3): 253-278.
[8] 刘斌,魏倩,吕越,等.制造业服务化与价值链升级[J].经济研究,2016,51(3):151-162.
[9] 韩峰,阳立高.生产性服务业集聚如何影响制造业结构升级——一个集聚经济与熊彼特内生增长理论的综合框架[J].管理世界,2020,36(2):72-94,219.
[10] 王磊,李吉.双向FDI、生产性服务业集聚与制造业全球价值链升级[J].工业技术经济,2021,40(10):86-93.
[11] JORGENSON D W, HO M S, STIROH K J. A retrospective look at the U.S. productivity growth resurgence[J]. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2008, 22(1): 3-24.
[12] 王星媛,白俊红.要素流动、资源错配与全要素生产率[J].经济问题探索,2021,42(10):50-61.
[13] 左晖,艾丹祥.ICT投资、偏向性技术变化与全要素生产率[J].统计研究,2021,38(9):19-33.
[14] 李有.双循环格局下研发溢出与中国工业产品复杂度[J].当代财经,2021,42(6):100-112.
[15] 江小涓,孟丽君.内循环为主、外循环赋能与更高水平双循环——国际经验与中国实践[J].管理世界,2021,37(1):1-19.
[16] 刘志彪,张杰.从融入全球价值链到构建国家价值链:中国产业升级的战略思考[J].学术月刊,2009,41(9):59-68.
[17] 郭凯明.人工智能发展、产业结构转型升级与劳动收入份额变动[J].管理世界,2019,35(7):60-77,202-203.
[18] 于斌斌.产业结构调整与生产率提升的经济增长效应——基于中国城市动态空间面板模型的分析[J].中国工业经济,2015,32(12):83-98.
[19] 黄群慧,倪红福.中国经济国内国际双循环的测度分析——兼论新发展格局的本质特征[J].管理世界,2021,37(12):40-58.
[20] KOOPMAN R, POWERS W, WANG Z, et al. Give credit where credit is due: tracing value added in global production chains[R].NBER Working Paper, No.16426,2010.
[21] 王立军,张伯伟,朱春礼.产业特征、宏观调控与技术创新策略选择——来自中国工业层面的证据[J].世界经济研究,2011,30(3):3-8,87.
[22] 宋炜,张彩红,周勇,等.数据要素与研发决策对工业全要素生产率的影响——来自2010—2019年中国工业的经验证据[J].科技进步与对策,2022,39(2):40-48.
[23] 王玉燕,林汉川,吕臣.全球价值链嵌入的技术进步效应——来自中国工业面板数据的经验研究[J].中国工业经济,2014,31(9):65-77.
[24] 黄鲁成,蔡爽.基于专利的技术跃迁实证研究[J].科研管理,2009,30(2):64-69.
[25] 郑江淮,郑玉.新兴经济大国中间产品创新驱动全球价值链攀升——基于中国经验的解释[J].中国工业经济,2020,37(5):61-79.
|
|
|
|
