|
|
|
| Internal Mechanism of Deep Integration of University-industry Innovation Subjects from the the Symbiotic Perspective :The Exploratory Case of Shenyang Blower and Dalian University of Technology |
| Zhang Xuewen1,Chi Jingming1,He Shengsheng1,Liu Yonggang2 |
| (1.Graduate School of Education, Dalian University of Technology; 2.Collaborative Innovation Center of Major Machine Manufacturing in Liaoning, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China) |
|
|
|
|
Abstract At present, deep integration of industry, university and research has become an inevitable requirement of the integrated innovation chain. Enterprises and universities have become twin engines of innovation-driven development. Deep integration between universities and enterprises requires both sides to form a new symbiotic relationship. However, so far, most universities and enterprises are still in a state of "co-existence" rather than "symbiosis". There are problems and drawbacks such as relatively low investment in research and development, limited participation of the main bodies and incomplete systems and mechanisms, and thus it is urgent to realize mutual adaption and further form a state of mutualism. Therefore, this study focuses on the adaptive behavior of mutual adaptation between universities and enterprises. Existing studies on the deep integration of universities and enterprises mainly explore practices and theories at the macro level, such as the connotation and characteristics, practical problems and path of implementation, whereas internal logic and process mechanism of deep integration from the perspective of subject behavior are relatively insufficient. Since relevant features of deep integration coincide with those of mutualism, this study creatively analyzes the internal logic of deep integration from the perspective of symbiosis, and combines the concept of adaptive behavior in Holland's thought of complex adaptive systems (CAS) theory to explore the internal process mechanism of deep integration of innovation subjects (universities and enterprises) from the perspective of symbiosis.#br#This study firstly summarizes the internal logic of deep integration based on the connotations of mutualism: (1) complementary advantages from both sides; (2) boundary integration to form an innovation platform; (3) positive interaction mechanisms and benefit sharing; (4) sharing of common beliefs and value creation together. Secondly, the method of exploratory case study is adopted to analyze the cooperation/collaboration process between Shenyang Blower and DUT combined with relevant features oftheir deep integration. The specific process of “search—select—mutation” of adaptive behavior is concluded by a large amount of secondary data and first-hand interview data, and the interactions and rule changes made by universities and enterprises to promote deep integration of resources are analyzed so as to clarify the specific process mechanism of deep integration.#br#The study confirms that firstly deep integration cannot be achieved overnight. Both sides need to adapt to each other, and establish a symbiotic relationship and perfect the symbiotic pattern until mutualism (continuous symbiosis and integrated symbiosis) is formed to achieve deep integration. Secondly universities and enterprises need to go through a three-stage of (search, selection and variation) adaptive process to achieve deep integration, which inevitably needs to change their own rules, and actively absorb the rules of the other side, namely iteration of rules is the key to achieving deep integration. Thirdly these rules include not only the explicit process of rules and regulations, but also the implicit cognitive pattern and values. In short, the core of deep integration between schools and enterprises lies in rules and adaptation. If either side only provides innovative resources without changing rules to adapt to each other, it will be difficult to achieve deep integration in real sense.#br#This paper takes the cooperative/collaborative process between enterprises and universities as the research object, and the findings enrich relevant theoretical research on deep integration by combining the thought of mutualism and concepts of adaptive behavior and deep integration. Being different from previous literatures, this paper innovatively introduces the concept of adaptive behavior into relevant theoretical studies of deep integration, explains the internal logic of deep integration with the idea of symbiosis, and focuses on the interactive behavior between enterprises and universities with a single case study for correlation analysis. Case studies support the conclusions of the paper, enrich relevant empirical research on deep integration, and connect changes of rules with the integration of resources. The research results also have practical significance for university-industry collaboration.#br#
|
|
Received: 26 July 2022
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 习近平.决胜全面建成小康社会,夺取新时代中国特色社会主义伟大胜利——在中国共产党第十九次全国代表大会上的报告[M].北京:人民出版社, 2017:31.
[2] 熊鸿儒.我国产学研深度融合的短板和挑战在哪里[J].学习与探索,2021,43(5):126-133,192.
[3] 沙其富,任媛媛.环巢湖科技创新走廊产学研融合机制研究[J].中国高校科技,2019,33(7):75-78.
[4] 邵进.产学研深度融合的探索与思考——基于三重螺旋模型的分析[J].中国高校科技,2015,29(8):7-9.
[5] 罗林波,李剑,张刚刚,等.高校科技成果转化与技术转移管理关键问题探析[J].中国高校科技,2019,33(6):75-78.
[6] 孙玉涛,张一帆.产学研合作网络演化的异质性机制——以北京为例[J].科研管理,2020,41(9):113-122.
[7] 张羽飞,原长弘,王涛,等.产学研深度融合演化路径分析——基于浙江清华长三角研究院的纵向案例研究[J].中国科技论坛,2020,37(7):87-98.
[8] 邵汉华,王瑶,罗俊.技术市场发展促进了产学研深度融合吗[J].管理评论,2022,34(11):99-108.
[9] 约翰·H·霍兰.隐秩序[M].周晓牧,等,译.上海:上海科技出版社,2017.
[10] DOUGLAS AE. The symbiotic habit[M]. New Jersey: Princeton University Press,2010.
[11] 袁纯清.共生理论及其对小型经济的应用研究(上)[J].改革,1998,15(2):101-105.
[12] 储节旺,李佳轩.基于知识生态系统视角下的产学研协同共生演化机理研究[J].情报科学,2023, 41(4):2-9.
[13] 蒋开东,詹国彬.共生理论视角下高校协同创新模式与路径研究[J].科研管理,2020,41(4):123-130.
[14] 张小峰,孙启贵.区域创新系统的共生机制与合作创新模式研究[J].科技管理研究,2013,33(5):172-177.
[15] 林海芬,王涛.惯例演化视角组织创新的实施机理研究——以天地华宇定日达创新为例[J].管理评论,2017,29(1):250-264.
[16] PATTON M Q. How to use qualitative methods in evaluation[M]. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications,1987.
[17] YIN R K. Applications of case study research[M]. 5 th ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, 2013.
[18] 王庆金,石仁波,杜甜甜,等.跨界搜寻如何促进企业管理创新——认知柔性与吸收能力的作用[J].科技进步与对策,2022,39(15):67-78.
[19] 王长明,赵景峰.创新模式选择、技术环境支持与供给侧结构性改革[J].现代经济探讨,2022,41(8):88-101.
|
|
|
|
