|
|
|
| Matching Methods of Breakthrough Technology Knowledge Elements Based on Evidence Reasoning |
| Liu Yumei, Wen Xin,Meng Xiangfei |
| (School of Management, Shenyang University of Technology,Shenyang 110870,China) |
|
|
|
|
Abstract The technology structure and innovation mode are constantly changing in the background of technology convergence and?interdiscipline, so the formation and realization of breakthrough technology innovation is highly uncertain. If it is regarded as the innovation result of technology knowledge convergence in different fields to achieve technological trajectory transition, the internal mechanism of breakthrough technology innovation can be effectively understood. In this paper, the evidence reasoning theory is applied and the technology is refined and decomposed into the form of knowledge element combination. According to the nature of breakthrough technology innovation and technology convergence, the technology matching rules and methods are given. The effectiveness of the matching rules and methods is verified by taking graphene technology as an example.#br#Theoretically, based on the diversification, dynamics and decentralization characteristics of breakthrough technology knowledge elements, technology is decomposed into the form of knowledge element combination, and the evidence reasoning theory is applied to construct the technology matching rules. The technology knowledge element matching model is the context of breakthrough technology innovation is proposed, and the rules and methods of technology knowledge matching in the formation process of breakthrough technology innovation with dynamic attributes are given. It further expands the theory and method of the formation and development about breakthrough technology innovation. In practice, in combination with the urgent need to tackle the bottleneck technologies, this study hasestablished the technology knowledge matching and convergence methods in the context of breakthrough technology innovation, provided reasonable and feasible guidance for the formation about breakthrough technology innovation, offer the theoretical and methodological tools for solving practical problems that are difficult to form breakthrough technological innovation.#br#Due to the complexity and uncertainty of breakthrough technology innovation and technological convergence, the matching relationship of technology knowledge elements is increasingly complex and uncertain. For this reason, based on the evidence reasoning theory, the trust function and likelihood function are introduced to fuse uncertain knowledge at different levels to measure the uncertainty flexibly. The technology refining is decomposed into the form of knowledge element combination, and the technology matching rules are determined according to the decisive factors for the formation of breakthrough technology innovation, i.e. technological novelty, difference and convergence, and then the technology knowledge element matching model is given. The graphene technology is taken as an example for the application analysis, so as to provide ideas and methods for technology matching research in the context of breakthrough technology innovation.#br#This paper proposes the matching rules and methods of technology knowledge elements in the context of breakthrough technology innovation. It explains the mechanism of technology matching and technology knowledge element matching in the context of breakthrough technology innovation from the micro and macro levels. On the one hand, the technology matchmaker obtains the technology provided by the technology provider through the technology matching rules and after the new technology is formed through technology convergence, it will continue to look for the other technology providers that can match it, forming a continuous benign development process; on the other hand, the novelty, difference and convergence of technology are the main factors that determine whether the technology knowledge elements can be integrated and achieve the breakthrough technology innovation, which provides a basis for the technology matching rules. Meanwhile by using the formula about transition degree of technological trajectory to represent the matching rules of technology knowledge elements, it is more conducive to finding the suitable technology knowledge elements from many sources of technology and knowledge for matching, and improving the effect of technology convergence and breakthrough technology innovation. It is proposed to build a technology knowledge element matching model in the context of breakthrough technology innovation, establish a multi-objective balanced technology matching model according to the timeliness, cost, innovation achievements and other factors, and then obtain the best matching scheme of technology knowledge elements, so as to improve the applicability of technology matching in the context of breakthrough technology innovation. #br#There are still some deficiencies in the technology matching method in this study. This paper only puts forward the matching scheme of technology in a certain period of time in technology matching. In practice, it is essential to consider the changes of technical requirements to be matched in different stages and the effect of matching schemes. In addition to considering the technology matching in a certain period of time, future researchshould also consider the changes of the technical requirements to be matched in different stages and the effect of the matching scheme in the technology matching scheme.#br#
|
|
Received: 07 March 2022
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] SRIVASTAVA M K,GNYAWAL D R. When do relational resources matter? leveraging portfolio technological resources for breakthrough innovation [J].IEEE Engineering Management Review, 2017, 45(2):83-96.
[2] MCDERMOTT C M, O'CONNOR G C. Managing radical innovation: an overview of emergent strategy issues [J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2002, 19(6):424-438.
[3] SCHOENMAKERS W, DUYSTERS G. The technological origins of radical inventions [J]. Research Policy, 2010, 39(8):1051-1059.
[4] 周磊,杨威,王芮.技术融合视角下新兴技术识别研究[J].科技进步与对策,2018, 35(15): 57-62.
[5] LEI D T. Industry evolution and competence development: the imperatives of technological conergence [J]. International Journal of Technology Management, 2000, 19(7-8): 699-738.
[6] KODAMA F. Emerging patterns of innovation: sources of Japan's technological edge[J]. R&D Management,1996, 26(2): 179-181.
[7] BORES C, SAURINA C, TORRES R. Technological convergence: a strategic perspective[J].Technovation, 2003, 23(1): 1-13.
[8] NO H J,PARK Y. Trajectory patterns of technology fusion: trend analysis and taxonomical grouping in nanobiotechnology[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change,2010,77(1):63-75.
[9] 李丫丫,赵玉林.基于专利的技术融合分析方法及其应用[J].科学学研究,2016, 34(2): 203-211.
[10] KIM J,LEE S. Forecasting and identifying muti-technology convergence based on patent data: the case of IT and BT industries in 2020[J]. Scientometrics,2017,111(1):47-65.
[11] KIM E,CHO Y,KIM W. Dynamic patterns of technological convergence in printed electronic technologies: patent citation network[J]. Scientometrics,2014,98(2):975-998.
[12] 娄岩,杨培培,黄鲁成,等.基于专利的技术融合测度方法——以信息技术与电动汽车技术的融合为例[J].现代情报,2017, 37(8):142-153.
[13] 宋呈晓,苗红.基于专利的技术融合趋势的驱动因素研究[J].情报杂志,2017,36(12):98-105.
[14] 邵云飞,党雁,王思梦.跨界创新在突破性技术创新模糊前端的作用机制[J]. 科技进步与对策,2018,35(22):8-16.
[15] BROWNLIE D T, MACBETH D K. The strategic management of technology: integrating technology supply and demand perspectives [J]. European Management Journal, 1989, 7(1): 71-83.
[16] KLERKX L, LEEUWIS C. Matching demand and supply in the agricultural knowledge infrastructure: experiences with innovation intermediaries [J]. Food Policy, 2008, 33(3): 260-276.
[17] HUNG S H, LIN C H, HONG J S. Web mining for event-based commonsense knowledge using lexico-syntactic pattern matching and semantic role labeling[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2010, 37(1): 341-347.
[18] 张娴,胡正银,茹丽洁,等. 技术供需信息关联知识组织模式研究[J].图书情报工作,2016, 60(8): 118-125.
[19] 朱卫东,吴勇.证据推理理论、方法及其在决策评估中的应用[M].北京:科学出版社,2016:10.
[20] 李纲,余辉,梁镇涛,等.技术交易中供需匹配影响因素研究——基于TOE框架的组态分析[J]. 情报理论与实践,2022,45(2):85-93,120.
[21] 汤胤,欧治花,陈杏惠,等.兴趣社交网络中的供需匹配研究:以豆瓣网为例[J].管理工程学报,2015, 29(2): 41-50.
[22] 胡健,菅会芳,孙金花.基于模糊案例推理的浅隐性知识供需匹配研究[J].情报理论与实践,2016,39(4): 84-88.
[23] CURRAN C, BRORING S, LEKER J. Anticipating converging industries using publicly available data[J].Technological Forecasting & Social Change,2010,77(3):385-395.
[24] CHANDY RK,TELLIS GJ. Organizing for radical product innovation: the over-looked role of willingness to cannibalize[J].Journal of Marketing Research, 1998,35(4):474-487.
[25] 张金柱,张晓林.利用引用科学知识突变识别突破性创新[J].情报学报,2014,33(3):259-266.
[26] FLEMING L. Recombinant uncertainty in technological search[J].Management Science, 2001,47(1):117-132.
[27] BERGEK A, BERGGREN C, MAGNUSSON T, et al. Technological discontinuities and the challenge for incumbent firms:destruction, disruption or creative accumulation[J].Research Policy, 2013, 42:1210-1224.
[28] 娄岩, 杨嘉林,黄鲁成,等.基于专利共类的技术融合分析框架研究——以老年福祉技术与信息技术的融合为例[J].现代情报, 2019, 39(9): 41-53.
[29] 张全,樊治平,孟军.D-S理论在不确定性多属性决策中的应用[J].系统工程与电子技术,1999,21(11):7-10.
[30] 吕一搏,韦明,林歌歌.基于专利计量的技术融合研究:判定、现状与趋势——以物联网与人工智能领域为例[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2019,40(4):16-31.
[31] 周广军.表面活性剂辅助的纳米材料的控制合成和机理研究[D].济南:山东大学,2003.
[32] 卓玉江.利用表面活性剂辅助的溶液路线在金属基片上生长异质结构纳米材料及性能研究[D].长春:东北师范大学,2013.
[33] 张宏伟.表面活性剂包覆多金属氧簇复合物作为阴极界面层在反式聚合物太阳能电池中的应用及机理的研究[D].长春:吉林大学,2020.
[34] FEI PAN, SONG BAI, XIAN WEI. 3D surfactant-dispersed graphemes as cathode interfacial materials for organic solar cells [J]. Science China Materials, 2021, 64(2):277-287.
[35] 王康.基于微纳米结构增强有机聚合物薄膜太阳能电池光吸收的研究[D].厦门:华侨大学,2019.
|
|
|
|
