|
|
The Influence and Mechanism of Digital Infrastructure on Industrial Upgrading |
Li Silin1,Yu Hongxin2,Wu Wenbo1,Ge Yingfan3 |
(1. College of Business, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai 200433, China;2.Faculty of Business and Economics, Shanghai Business School, Shanghai 200235, China;3. College of Finance, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai 200433, China) |
|
|
Abstract With the accelerating development of China's digital economy and industrial digitalization, the penetration rate of digital technology in industry and service industries continues to increase, and the demand for digital infrastructure such as 5G, industrial Internet, big data centers, and artificial intelligence is greater. It is very urgent for China to speed up the adjustment and optimization of its industrial structure. At the same time, the demand for infrastructure has also undergone a structural change. Therefore, as the focus of a new round of infrastructure investment, digital infrastructure plays an important role in improving the overall production efficiency of the industry and promoting the transformation of the industrial structure to service. As the underlying physical foundation supporting the digital economy, the digital infrastructure promotes the difference in technological progress between industries, which will cause the social employment population to gradually shift from the primary industry to the secondary and tertiary industries on a large scale, thereby realizing the service-oriented industrial structure. Due to the decline in the overall proportion of the manufacturing industry that is biased by technological progress, the overall productivity of the society may decline, resulting in a decline in economic growth and the formation of "Baumol's cost disease".#br#This paper selects seven indicators, such as mobile phone base stations, optical cable route length, broadband access ports, number of domain names, number of web pages, number of IPv4 addresses, and software business revenue, and calculates the data of 30 provinces, municipalities and autonomous regions in China from 2013 to 2020 through the entropy method.On the basis of the "Engel effect" and "Baumol effect" of digital infrastructure,this study analyzes the impact and mechanism of industrial upgrading, and through the mediation effect analysis, it empirically tests the impact of digital infrastructure in the process of promoting China's industrial upgrading, consumption upgrading and technology. Finally, the study further examines the impact of digital infrastructure on "Baumol cost disease". It is found that firstly digital infrastructure has a promoting effect on regional industrial structure upgrading and industrial productivity improvement. The regional effect is the most obvious, followed by the western region and the weakest in the eastern region. Secondly the "Engel effect" and the "Baumol effect" are still the main factors affecting the industrial upgrading of digital infrastructure, among which the level of disposable income of residents, the level of consumer spending and the level of innovation in high-tech industries are all important mediating variables. Thirdly further research finds that digital infrastructure promotes the service-oriented industrial structure and the overall productivity of the industry at the same time and alleviates the "Baumol cost disease" problem. Lastly digital infrastructure promotes the service-oriented industrial structure by increasing the per capita consumption expenditure of residents, but the effect of improving industrial production efficiency is not obvious.#br#To sum up, this paper uses China's provincial panel data as samples to explain the impact and mechanism of digital infrastructure on Chinese industrial upgrading and provides a reference for China's new round of infrastructure construction strategies. According to the research conclusions of this paper, it is suggested that firstly it is necessary to continue to strengthen the investment and construction of digital infrastructure, and adopt differentiated development strategies according to the different characteristics of the region. The government should actively guide and encourage the participation and operation of social capital. In addition, the construction of digital infrastructure in the central and western regions should be accelerated, and the widespread application of new-generation digital technologies in society should be accelerated, thereby narrowing the development gaps between regions and promoting common prosperity. Secondly, it is vital to focus on building digital infrastructure that is conducive to improving corporate innovation and production efficiency, increasing residents' income, mitigating the adverse effects of the "Baumol cost disease",promoting overall social productivity, and realizing industrial transformation and upgrading.#br#
|
Received: 26 September 2022
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 郭凯明,潘珊,颜色.新型基础设施投资与产业结构转型升级[J].中国工业经济,2020,37(3):63-80. [2] 林毅夫.新结构经济学——重构发展经济学的框架[J].经济学(季刊),2011,10(1):1-32. [3] 崔寅,孙钰.中国互联网基础设施与产业结构优化关系研究[J].科技进步与对策,2021,38(13):64-71. [4] 魏作磊,刘海燕.服务业比重上升降低了中国经济增长速度吗[J].经济学家,2019,31(11):55-63. [5] 江小涓,罗立彬.网络时代的服务全球化——新引擎、加速度和大国竞争力[J].中国社会科学,2019,40(2):68-91,205-206. [6] PUGNO M. The service paradox and endogenous economic growth[J]. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 2006, 17(1): 99-115. [7] HUMPHREY J, SCHMITZ H. How does insertion in global value chains affect upgrading in industrial clusters[J]. Regional Studies, 2002, 36(9): 1017-1027. [8] 干春晖,郑若谷,余典范.中国产业结构变迁对经济增长和波动的影响[J].经济研究,2011,57(5):4-16. [9] TOMASZ SWIECKI. Determinants of structural change[J]. Review of Economic Dynamics, 2017, 24:95-131. [10] AZADEGAN A, WAGNER S M. Industrial upgrading, exploitative innovations and explorative innovations[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2011, 130(1): 54-65. [11] 王奕飞,侯诺抒其,姚凯.数字经济对我国产业结构转型升级的影响[J].商业经济研究,2022,41(9):185-188. [12] KRUGMAN P. Increasing returns and economic geography[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1991, 99(3): 483-499. [13] 张青,茹少峰.新型数字基础设施促进现代服务业虚拟集聚的路径研究[J].经济问题探索,2021,42(7):123-135. [14] DOI J. Consumption structure and the pattern of economic growth[J]. Seoul Journal of Economics, 2003, 16(3): 343-362. [15] 潘锡泉.消费升级引领产业升级:作用机理及操作取向[J].当代经济管理,2019,41(3):11-16. [16] 杨天宇,陈明玉.消费升级对产业迈向中高端的带动作用:理论逻辑和经验证据[J].经济学家,2018,30(11):48-54. [17] 张翠菊,张宗益.消费结构对产业结构与经济增长的空间效应——基于空间面板模型的研究[J].统计与信息论坛,2016,31(8):46-52. [18] 季洁.居民收入增长推进金融结构市场化机制探讨[J].中国流通经济,2014,28(3):122-128. [19] 夏海波,刘耀彬,沈正兰.网络基础设施建设对劳动力就业的影响——基于“本地—邻地”的视角[J].中国人口科学,2021,35(6):96-109,128. [20] 焦帅涛,孙秋碧.数字经济发展与消费升级联动的机理及其实证研究[J].工业技术经济,2021,40(12):84-93. [21] 李扬,张晓晶.“新常态”:经济发展的逻辑与前景[J].经济研究,2015,61(5):4-19. [22] AGHION P, HOWITT P. A model of growth through creative destruction[J]. Econometrica, 1992, 60: 323-351. [23] PENEDER M. Industrial structure and aggregate growth[J]. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 2003, 14(4): 427-448. [24] 汤长安.高技术产业发展水平对区域产业结构升级影响的空间计量分析[J].湖南师范大学社会科学学报,2018,47(2):102-111. [25] 夏海力,叶爱山,周霞.高技术产业发展与区域产业结构升级——基于省际面板数据的实证研究[J].科技管理研究,2019,39(4):166-173. [26] 孙伟增,牛冬晓,万广华.交通基础设施建设与产业结构升级——以高铁建设为例的实证分析[J].管理世界,2022,38(3):19-41,58. [27] 袁徽文,高波.数字经济发展与高技术产业创新效率提升——基于中国省级面板数据的实证检验[J].科技进步与对策,2022,39(10):61-71. [28] LI D, CHEN Y, MIAO J. Does ICT create a new driving force for manufacturing:evidence from Chinese manufacturing firms[J]. Telecommunications Policy, 2022, 46(1): 102229. [29] 王玉.数字经济对中小制造企业转型的影响研究[J].经济社会体制比较,2021,37(3):47-57. [30] 盛斌,赵文涛.地区全球价值链、市场分割与产业升级——基于空间溢出视角的分析[J].财贸经济,2020,41(9):131-145. [31] 何姝,余军.创新资源对中国产业结构升级的影响研究[J].工业技术经济,2021,40(8):47-51. [32] 何玉梅,赵欣灏.新型数字基础设施能够推动产业结构升级吗——来自中国272个地级市的经验证据[J].科技进步与对策,2021,38(17):79-86. [33] 钞小静,廉园梅,罗鎏锴.新型数字基础设施对制造业高质量发展的影响[J].财贸研究,2021,32(10):1-13. [34] 范合君,吴婷.新型数字基础设施、数字化能力与全要素生产率[J].经济与管理研究,2022,43(1):3-22. [35] 朱平芳,徐伟民.政府的科技激励政策对大中型工业企业R&D投入及其专利产出的影响——上海市的实证研究[J].经济研究,2003,49(6):45-53,94. [36] BARON R M, KENNY D A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research:conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986, 51(6): 1173-1182.
|
|
|
|