|
|
|
| The Influence Mechanism of Enabling Government Behavior on the Construction of Industrial Chain: A Multiple Case Study Based on Grounded Theory |
| Wang Jinfu,Cheng Menglan,Zhang Yingying |
| (School of Management,Xi′an Polytechnic University,Xi′an 710048,China) |
|
|
|
|
Abstract A stable industrial chain is of great practical significance to China's industrial development and economic growth. However the COVID-19 epidemic and the prevalence of trade protection entities have caused a serious impact on China's industrial chain and supply chain. Given the practical characteristics of China's economic system and domestic local industrial development, it is infeasible to rely entirely on the market mechanism to build the chain enterprises or the industry itself; the successful practices of Hefei, Shenzhen and other local governments proves that it is an effective path for local governments to play the role of "visible hand" to promote the construction of industrial chain. However, at present, there is an academic controversy about the role of the government in the construction of the industrial chain. The proponents suggest that the government should take the initiative, and the opponents believe that the industrial chain is an industrial ecological organization formed in market competition, and too much reliance on local governments to promote the construction of the industrial chain will lead to resource misallocation and industrial preferential management. The controversies imply the core issue of how government behavior can play an effective role in the construction of industrial chain. The theory of enabling government provides new research ideas for solving this problem. In addition, the construction of industrial chain requires a variety of resources and capabilities across industries and organizations. The value added based on the synergy effect is an important driving force for the construction of industrial chain, and the value synergy of members in the system helps to promote the generation of system value. It can be seen that value synergy is an important variable affecting the activities of the industrial chain system, but the in-depth research on existing value synergy is mainly concentrated in the field of innovation ecosystem, and only a few scholars have transplanted this concept to the study of the industrial chain with preliminary discussion of the role and effect of enterprise value synergy on the chain in the industrial development. How to further divide the value synergy and how the value synergy between enterprises on the chain affects the construction of the industrial chain need in-depth exploration. Therefore, from the perspective of on-chain enterprise value collaboration, this paper studies the enabling government behavior and its mechanism affecting the construction of industrial chain based on the theory of enabling government.#br#This paper selects the industry chain of most classic new display, integrated circuit and new energy vehicle in Hefei as the study object, and obtains the primary and secondary data through semi-structured interviews, literature review, policy documents and other channels. By applying Nvivo 12.0 software to standardize the collected data for three-level coding of normative rooted theory, it aims to clarify the enabling government behavior to promote the construction of industrial chain, and explore the influence mechanism of enabling government behavior on industrial chain construction.#br#Through multiple case studies, it is found that firstly enabling government mainly promotes the construction of regional industrial chain through top-level design empowerment, key link empowerment and basic element empowerment, of which top-level design empowerment behaviors include identifying regional industrial foundations and strategic support, key link enabling behaviors include strategic investment and supporting industrial chain coordination, and basic element empowerment behaviors include gathering talents, promoting government-industry-university-research collaboration and optimizing the business environment. Secondly the top-level design empowerment behavior is the premise for promoting the construction of regional industrial chain; enabling behavior in key links is the key to promoting the construction of regional industrial chain; the enabling behavior of basic elements provides basic resources for the construction of regional industrial chain. Thirdly strategic synergy and resource synergy in on-chain enterprise value synergy play important mediating roles in the enabling government behavior to promote the construction of industrial chain.#br#In summary this study enriches the practical application of the enabling government theory and clarifies the specific government enabling behaviors to promote the construction of industrial chain; from the perspective of on-chain enterprise value synergy, it opens the black box of the impact mechanism of enabling government behaviors on industrial chain construction and provides reference for relevant enterprises in the industrial chain to promote the construction of industrial chain.#br#
|
|
Received: 09 August 2022
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 陈晓东,杨晓霞.数字化转型是否提升了产业链自主可控能力[J].经济管理,2022,44(8):23-39.
[2] 石建勋,卢丹宁,徐玲.第四次全球产业链重构与中国产业链升级研究[J].财经问题研究,2022,44(4):36-46.
[3] 中国社会科学院工业经济研究所课题组,曲永义.产业链链长的理论内涵及其功能实现[J].中国工业经济,2022,39(7):5-24.
[4] 谭劲松,宋娟,陈晓红.产业创新生态系统的形成与演进：“架构者”变迁及其战略行为演变[J].管理世界,2021,37(9):167-191.
[5] 盛朝迅.从产业政策到产业链政策:“链时代”产业发展的战略选择[J].改革,2022,35(2):22-35.
[6] 刘志彪,孔令池.双循环格局下的链长制:地方主导型产业政策的新形态和功能探索[J].山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2021,71(1):110-118.
[7] 黄先海,宋学印.赋能型政府——新一代政府和市场关系的理论建构[J].管理世界,2021,37(11):41-55,4.
[8] 徐霞,吴福象,王兵.政府大数据赋能城市创新：理论机制与经验证据[J].经济理论与经济管理,2021,41(12):42-56.
[9] 张汉鹏.数字经济背景下的产业链发展与治理[J].福建师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2022,67(2):78-83,171.
[10] 简兆权,令狐克睿,李雷.价值共创研究的演进与展望——从“顾客体验”到“服务生态系统”视角[J].外国经济与管理,2016,38(9):3-20.
[11] 张安淇,李元旭.众包价值协同对企业创新绩效的影响机制研究[J].预测,2019,38(5):23-28.
[12] MEYER W A D.Ecosystem advantage: how to successfully harness the power of partners[J].California Management Review,2012,55(1):24-46.
[13] 朱国军,王修齐,张宏远.智能制造核心企业如何牵头组建创新联合体——来自华为智能汽车业务的探索性案例研究[J].科技进步与对策,2022,39(19):12-19.
[14] BENJAMIN KNOKE,MICHELE MISSIKOFF.Collaborative open innovation management in virtual manufacturing enterprises[J]. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 2015,30(1):158-166.
[15] 滕颖,杜华勇,李其原.管理认知转变视角下战略创业双元活动的转换过程与机理[J].管理学报,2021,18(12):1798-1806.
[16] VARGO S L,LUSCH R F. Institutions and axioms: an extension and update of service-dominant logic[J].Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,2016,44(1):5-23.
[17] TIWANA A. Platform desertion by APP developers[J].Journal of Management Information Systems,2015,32(4):40-77.
[18] 赵晶,刘玉洁,付珂语,等.大型国企发挥产业链链长职能的路径与机制——基于特高压输电工程的案例研究[J].管理世界,2022,38(5):221-240.
[19] 宋华,杨雨东.中国产业链供应链现代化的内涵与发展路径探析[J].中国人民大学学报,2022,36(1):120-134.
[20] 吴金明,邵昶.产业链形成机制研究——“4+4+4”模型[J].中国工业经济,2006,23(4):36-43.
[21] 龚勤林.论产业链构建与城乡统筹发展[J].经济学家,2004,16(3):121-123.
[22] 王亮,靳振忠.什么更吸引互联网风险投资:产业还是资本[J].证券市场导报,2020,30(9):24-32.
[23] 金永花.新发展机遇期我国新能源汽车产业链水平提升研究[J].经济纵横,2022,38(1):83-90.
[24] JACOBIDES M G,CENNAMO C,GAWER A.Towards a theory of ecosystems[J]. Social Science Electronic Publishing,2018,39(8):2255-2276.
[25] YIN R K.Case study research: design and methods 5ed[M].Blackwell Science Ltd,2013.
[26] BURFORD N,A V SHIPILOV,SAND N FURR.How ecosystem structure affects firm performance in response to a negative shock to interdependencies[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2021,22(7):613-642.
[27] 贾旭东,衡量.扎根理论的“丛林”、过往与进路[J].科研管理,2020,41(5):151-163.
[28] 李子彪,王思惟,高光琪.高质量发展背景下中国冰雪体育产业链的整合模式及对策[J].当代经济管理,2022,44(12):63-72.
[29] 崔祥民,柴晨星.创新人才集聚对经济高质量发展的影响效应研究——基于长三角41个城市面板数据的实证分析[J].软科学,2022,36(6):106-114.
[30] 宋娟,张莹莹,谭劲松.创新生态系统下核心企业创新“盲点”识别及突破的案例分析[J].研究与发展管理,2019,31(4):76-90.
[31] KAZAN E,TAN C,LIM E T,et al. Disentangling digital platform competition: the case of UK mobile payment platforms[J].Journal of Management Information Systems,2018,35 (1):180-219.
[32] 苏策,何地,郭燕青.企业创新生态系统战略开发与竞争优势构建研究[J].宏观经济研究,2021,43(4):160-169.
[33] 陈爱贞,陈凤兰,何诚颖.产业链关联与企业创新[J].中国工业经济,2021,38(9):80-98.
[34] 张振刚,尚钰,陈一华.大数据能力对企业创新绩效的影响——IT-业务融合与双元环境的调节作用[J].科技进步与对策,2021,38(14):82-90.
[35] 程雅馨,程延园,何勤,等.平台企业赋能与价值共创的动态过程——基于社会交换视角的多案例分析[J].管理案例研究与评论,2022,15(5):468-484.
|
|
|
|
