|
|
|
| Investigation and Empirical Study on Key Factors of High Quality Operation of Innovation and Entrepreneurship Community |
| Qiao Pengcheng1,Zhang Yansong2 |
| (1.Finance and Economics College,Xizang Minzu University;2.Management College,Xizang Minzu University, Xianyang 712082,China) |
|
|
|
|
Abstract In recent years, universities have set up compulsory courses on innovation and entrepreneurship, and the high-quality operation of innovation and entrepreneurship community has come into the focus. Innovation and entrepreneurship communities play an important role in the construction of innovation and entrepreneurship ecosystem in colleges and universities. There are rich researches on innovation and entrepreneurship education, and scholars focus on the construction of education quality evaluation system in innovation and entrepreneurship. However the high-quality development of innovation and entrepreneurship communities is seldom touched, the operation conditions of the communities is often ignored, and only a few literatures conducted questionnaire survey. This paper innovatively uses a questionnaire to study the key factors of high-quality operation of innovation and entrepreneurship communities with rich real and effective data. This paper tries to analyze its influence on the high-quality operation of innovation and entrepreneurship communities from five aspects: breadth of members, the degree of autonomy of students, the abundance of content, the prominence of professional characteristics and the close cooperation with teaching.#br#On the basis ofthe trinity theoretical framework of innovation and entrepreneurship(ecosystem theory , learning, action and shaping) and the literature and semi-structured interviews, this paper preliminarily determines the factors influencing the quality of innovation and entrepreneurship education in the era of innovation empowerment and forms a questionnaire. A nationwide data collection was carried out from January to April 2020 on the basis of a small-scale pilot survey and empirical data analysis. The subjects of the survey were students, teachers and staff members who participated in the study after graduation. The questionnaire survey adopts the method of random sampling with the paper and the online questionnaire combined. A total of 450 questionnaires were distributed and 410 were recovered, with 393 valid questionnaires and an effective rate of 95.85%.#br#This paper empirically studies the influencing factors of high quality operation of innovation and entrepreneurship community and makes an in-depth study of the corresponding mechanism.It is found that the high-quality operation of innovation and entrepreneurship associations is influenced and co-acted by the five factors mentioned above: enhancing the breadth of members will help promote the high-quality operation of innovation and entrepreneurship associations;the higher the degree of student autonomy is, the better the quality operation of innovation and entrepreneurship associations will be;the abundance of content can promote innovative undertaking corporate operation;the characteristics of professional high quality operation are positively correlated with innovative entrepreneurial communities. Further research shows that compared with graduate students and graduates, undergraduates are more willing to participate in entrepreneurship and entrepreneurship clubs, and the richness of club activities is the primary consideration. The research conclusion has certain reference value for the design of high quality operation scheme of innovation and entrepreneurship community. It is suggested that the university should further strengthen the publicity of innovation and entrepreneurship and regularly hold relevant competitions and lectures. Meanwhile,the degree of student autonomy should be properly relaxed and teachers should play the role of catalyst. The community should carry out characteristics activities ,maintain its own characteristics and be closely related to its own course and community members should be given priority to with undergraduates. Future research can be carried out from the following aspects: the impreesion of innovation and entrepreneurship communities among students, the reasons for the success and failures of innovation and entrepreneurship courses and the opportunity of entrepreneurship.#br#
|
|
Received: 15 October 2021
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 马永霞,孟尚尚.高质量发展背景下创新创业教育质量提升路径研究——基于50所高校的模糊集定性比较分析[J].高教探索,2022,38(2):13-21.
[2] 刘文杰.从“背离”到“融合”:高校创业教育与专业教育的困境及其消解[J].内蒙古社会科学,2021,42(5):185-191.
[3] WATSON K, MCGOWAN P, SMITH P. Extracurricular business planning competitions challenging the assumptions[J]. Industry & Higher Education,2014,28(6):411-415.
[4] 王洪才,郑雅倩.大学生创新创业能力测量及发展特征研究[J].华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2022,61(3):155-165.
[5] 苏克治,宋丹,赵哲.大学创新创业教育的逻辑构成、现实困阻与长效机制[J].现代教育管理,2022,41(3):40-47.
[6] YOON S A,MILLER K,RICHMAN T.Comparative study of high-quality professional development for high school biology in a face-to-face versus online delivery mode[J]. Educational Technology & Society, 2020, 23(3): 68-80.
[7] 雷金火,陈江.大学数字创业教育的课程与教学设计：基于设计思维视角[J].教育发展研究,2021,41(11):32-38.
[8] 甘静娴,芮正云.“双创”时代高校创客空间的复杂适应系统分析及优化策略[J].科技进步与对策,2018,35(7):113-117.
[9] BRONFENBRENNER U. Toward an experimental ecology of human development[J].American Psychologist, 1977,32(7):513-531.
[10] NOURSI S, SALUJA B, RICHEYL. Using the ecological systems theory to understand black/white disparities in maternal morbidity and mortality in the United States[J]. Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities, 2020, 8(5): 1-9.
[11] 李亚员,刘海滨,孔洁珺.高校创新创业教育生态系统建设的理想样态——基于4个国家8所典型高校的跨案例比较分析[J].高校教育管理,2022,16(2):32-46.
[12] 郭哲,田慧君,王孙禺.多元主体协同视角下发达国家创业教育生态系统的比较研究——来自美国和欧盟的范例[J].清华大学教育研究,2021,42(5):140-148.
[13] 项国鹏,曾传圣.国外创业生态系统研究最新进展及未来展望[J].科技进步与对策,2020,37(14):151-160.
[14] 赵静杰，王军，王特.基于Timmons三要素理论的创业者竞争情报分析模型构建[J].情报科学，2019,37(10):140-145，169.
[15] 蔺海沣,谢雯港.团队灵性资本如何影响青年创业团队创新绩效——情感承诺的中介作用与市场导向的调节作用[J].科技进步与对策,2021,38(14):133-142.
[16] 易全勇，刘许，姚歆玥，等.众创空间对大学生创客团队创新绩效的影响及机制研究[J].重庆高教研究，2021,9(3):24-35.
[17] 张银普，钱思，石伟.创业团队共享领导对企业创新绩效的影响机制[J].管理科学，2020,33(3):3-15.
[18] 龙静，郑松，王乐.创业团队异质性与创新：战略共识和凝聚力的调节[J].科研管理，2020,41(12):238-245.
[19] 万力勇.高校创客空间运行机制研究——基于美国高等教育创客空间联盟高校的实践启示[J].中国电化教育，2021,42(4):75-83.
[20] 王鑫.创客文化视域下高校创新创业教育的影响因素与内涵优化[J].思想理论教育，2021,37(2):106-111.
[21] 马永霞,窦亚飞.以能力培养为导向的高校创业教育生态系统的关键要素与构建策略——基于DEMATEL-ISM方法的实证分析[J].教育发展研究,2022,42(1):68-76.
[22] 乔鹏程,黄沁.双创生态中众创空间高效运营实证研究[J].大连海事大学学报(社会科学版),2022,21(1):61-70.
[23] 陈飞,郭兴华.高校学生社团组织育人功能研究[J].学校党建与思想教育,2022,40(8):74-77.
[24] 王淼.大学生主体性培育视角的高校社团建设研究[J].教育理论与实践，2016,36(3):41-43.
[25] 孙榆婷,杜在超,赵国昌,等.大学生社团参与对毕业生起薪的影响[J].南开经济研究,2021,37(2):110-129.
[26] 赵旭,张中献,宁振虎.基于问卷调查数据的某研究型综合性大学教师口碑的影响因素统计分析[J].数理统计与管理,2021,40(1):71-77.
[27] 吴晓波，许宏啟，赵敏超，等.创业团队性别多样性对商业模式创新的影响研究：团队任务特性的调节作用[J].浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版),2021,51(1):95-110.
[28] 何晓敏.高职院校女大学生创新创业人才培养模式探索[J].湖南社会科学，2019,32(2):166-172.
[29] GLENN R, SHEILA W. Researcher-identified and emergent predictors of pupil control ideologies: a Canadian beginning teacher perspective[J]. Teacher Development, 2013, 17(4): 478-498.
|
|
|
|
